Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

Two features have characterised the Indian coal industry: centralisation and state ownership. Both have their historical reasons. Centralisation originated in the late eighteenth century when the East India Company was granted a licence to start coal mining in the Raniganj Coalfield along the west bank of the river Damodar, about 120 miles west of Calcutta. Despite the laissez-faire policy of the British-Indian government, centralisation of the coal industry continued; upon independence, about 70% of the country’s coal production was in the hands of a few large producers, and 60% of the coal was consumed by three sectors: rail, steel and utility. Today, more than 80% of the coal production is from Coal India Limited (CIL). State ownership can be traced back to the World War II era when the British-Indian government temporarily took over the production and distribution of coal, imposed price controls and determined wages through government arbitration, in order to serve the war effort of the British troops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous (2004) ‘Coal: In a Political Bind’, editorial of Economic and Political Weekly, 4 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2011a) ‘Coal India’s Monopoly Has to Go’, Financial Express, (India), 21 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2011b) ‘Coal Ministry Urges Orissa to Form Committees for Mine Projects’, Business Standard, 21 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, N. (2002) ‘A Decade of Economic Reforms in India: The Unfinished Agenda’, CID Working Paper No. 89, Centre for International Development at Harvard University, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCCL (2006) ‘Turn Around Story of BCCL’, at http://bccl.cmpdi.co.in/, (downloaded 18 September 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, R. (2011) ‘Understanding the Coal Crisis’, The Hindu Business Line, 21 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber, P. and S. Eldersveld (2000) ‘Local Elites and Popular Support for Economic Reform in China and India’, Comparative Political Studies, 33(3): 350–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘Essential Commodities Act, 1955’, http://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/esca.html, (downloaded 18 September 2006).

  • Economist (2011) ‘Adventures in Capitalism’, Special Report on ‘Business in India’, 22 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2002) Coal in the Energy Supply of India, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, K. (1992) Industrial Development Policy of India, Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2004) ‘Labour Policy and the Second Generation of Economic Reform in India’, India Review, 3(4): 333–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, S. (2003) ‘The Political Economy of India’s Second-Generation Reforms’, in S. Ganguly, ed. India as an Emerging Power, London: Frank Case, 207–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. (1997) ‘Coal Sector Performance, Problems and Prospects,’ in M.V. Srinivasa Gowda and S. Subrahmanya, eds, Infrastructure Development for Economic Growth, New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications, 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (1981) ‘Nationalisation by Default: The Case of Coal in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 25 April, 16(17): 757–68, 824–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Coal (2007) ‘Report (Part II) of the Expert Committee on Road Map for Coal Sector Reforms’, New Delhi, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowli, V.C. (1996) Black Diamond — Nor Forever? New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parakh, P.C. (2006) ‘Indian Coal: Pricing and Institutional Issues’, TERI, Energy Security Insights, 1– 3, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (1996) ‘Report of the Committee on Integrated Coal Policy’, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (2005a) ‘Draft Report of the Expert Committee on Integrated Energy Policy’, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (2005b) ‘Report of the Expert Committee on Road Map for Coal Sector Reforms’, New Delhi, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A.K. (2001) ‘Coal Decontrol: A Cure Worse Than the Disease’, The Statesman, 22 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J.D., A. Varshney and N. Bajpai, eds (1999) India in the Era of Economic Reform, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, P.B. (1994) Coal Industry and Labour in India, Delhi: R.S. Books International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddartha (1997) ‘An Untenable Comparison’, Economic and Political Weekly, 32(22): 1286–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2010) ‘PSEs Need to Step up Search for Global Assets’, India lnfoline News Services, 15 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2004) ‘Some Economic Consequences of India’s Institutions of Governance: A Conceptual Framework’, India Review, 3(2): 114–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. and U. Bhaskar (2011) ‘CIL’s Monopoly Will Definitely Stay’, interview given by the minister of coal, on 14 November 2011, at http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/13212353/Sriprakash-Jaiswal-CIL8217.htm1 (downloaded 7 December 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A. (2004) ‘The Changing Political Economy of Federalism in India: A Historical Institutionalist Approach’, India Review, 3(1): 25–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing Committee of Energy (2001) ‘Report on the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Bill, 2001’, Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, August, chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Committee on Energy (2003) ‘Forty First Report: Demands for Grants (2003–2004), Ministry of Coal’, Thirteenth Lok Sabha, Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teri (2001) ‘Report on the Problems of Coal Supply to Thermal Power Stations’, TERI Project Report No. 2000ER69, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1995) ‘Summary of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the India Coal Sector’, E0112, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1996) ‘India: Coal Sector Environmental and Social Mitigation Project: Staff Appraisal Report,’ Report No. 15405-IN, 24 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997a) ‘India: Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project, Staff Appraisal Report’, 31 July.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997b) ‘India: Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project’, Report No. PID724, 23 September.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1998) ‘Guarantee Agreement (Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project) between India and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development’, 19 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002a) ‘Implementation Completion Report on a Loan/Credit in the Amount of US$532 million to India for a Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project’, Report No. 23743, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002b) ‘Implementation Completion Report on a Loan/Credit to India for a Coal Sector Rehabilitation Project’, Report No. 23743, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003) ‘Implementation Completion Report on a Credit in the Amount of US$52.51 Million to India for a Coal Sector Environmental and Social Mitigation Project’ Report No. 25021, 10 April.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Xu Yi-chong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yi-chong, X. (2012). Coal India Limited: The Last One Standing. In: Yi-chong, X. (eds) The Political Economy of State-owned Enterprises in China and India. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271655_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics