Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technologies of Power? Constructing Digital Exclusion, Risk and Responsibility

  • Chapter
Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between technology and risk is not straightforward. The current period of development in Western societies, whether conceptualised as late modernity’ (Giddens, 1991), ‘liquid modernity’ (Bauman, 2000) or ‘postmodernity’ (Harvey, 1990), is defined by the increasing prominence of information and communication technology (ICT) in our lives. As indicated above, this is often viewed in a positive manner, with ICTs presented as empowering. At the same time society is seen to be organized around exposure to new forms of risk often brought about by technological change (Beck, 1992), including a rapidly evolving global economy and demands for an increasingly flexible workforce. New technologies have also been associated with other dangers including inappropriate content and use, surveillance and overuse (Byron, 2008). Whether the increasing proliferation of ICT facilitates the reproduction of such risks or militates against them is debatable. As a way of contributing to this debate, risk is not viewed here as a generic feature of contemporary society, but as a set of ideas which are constructed and reproduced through specific political discourses with very real consequences.

The number one benefit of information technology is that it empowers people to do what they want to do. It lets people be creative. It lets people be productive. It lets people learn things they didn’t think they could learn before, and so in a sense it is all about potential.

(Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive, Microsoft, 2005)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ballmer, S. (2005) Microsoft Corporation Alamo Area Community Information System (AACIS) Unlimited Potential Grant Announcement, San Antonio, Texas, 17 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (eds) (2001) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2010) ‘UK Net Use Grows despite Digital Inequalities’, www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11734910 [Accessed 14 December 2011].

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • BECTA (2007) The Use of ICT in Further Education. GfK NOP Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, R. and Roberts, D. (2008) Assistive Technology and Older People, Research Briefing 28. London: Social Care Institute of Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (2010) ‘If You’re Not Online These Days You’re A Second-Class Citizen’, The Observer, 26 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbrook, G. and Fisher, J. (2004) Digital Equality: Reviewing Digital Inclusion Activity and Mapping the Way Forwards (Citizens Online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, T. (2008) Safer Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2006) ‘The Privatization of Risk’, Public Culture, 18(2), 257–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. (2006) ‘Geographies of Welfare and Exclusion: Social Inclusion and Exception’, Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. (2009) Digital Britain: The Interim Report. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010) The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2005) ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilised, Abandoned?’ Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 447–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2011) ‘Army of Volunteers to Push to Tackle “digital exclusion”’, Fresh Business Thinking, www.freshbusinessthinking.com/news.php?CID=4andNID=8402andTitle=Army+of+volunteers+to+tackle+’digital+exclsion [Accessed 15 December 2011].

  • Clayton, J. and Macdonald, S. J. (2013) ‘The Limits of Technology: Social Class, Occupation and Digital Inclusion in the City of Sunderland, England’, Information, Communication and Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012. 748817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J., Macdonald, S. J. and Wilcock, A. (2010) City of Sunderland Digital Inclusion Evaluation Final Report. Sunderland: University of Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comet (2012) Press Release, http://press.comet.co.uk/index.php?cID=304& cType=news [Accessed 27 May 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M. (2008) ‘Digital Inclusion Isn’t Just About Playing Santa Claus’, The Guardian, 1 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2008) Delivering Digital Inclusion: An Action Plan for Consultation. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2009) Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision Making. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devins, D., Darlow, A. and Smith, V. (2003) ‘Lifelong Learning and Digital Exclusion: Lessons from the Evaluation of an ICT Learning Centre and an Emerging Research Agenda’, Regional Studies, 36(8), 941–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digital Inclusion Team (2007) The Digital Inclusion Landscape in England: Delivering Social Impact through Information and Communications Technology. London: Digital Inclusion Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feneira, J. and Rocha, M. E. M. (2010) ‘Digital Democracy: Beyond the Idea of Distributive Justice’. In S. Albagli and M. L. Maciel (eds) Information, Power and Politics: Technological and Institutional Mediations. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp. 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, C. and Kenny, C. J. (2003) ‘W(h)ither the Digital Divide?’ The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 5, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population, Lectures at the College de France 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C. (2009) ‘Digital Inclusion — a Government Perspective’, IT in the Community Conference, Sunderland, UK, 1 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V. (2005) ‘Meeting Patents’ Needs? Discourses of “Support” and “Inclusion” in Family Policy’, Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2002) ‘Bridging Urban Digital Divides? Urban Polarization and Information and Communication Technologies’, Urban Studies, 39(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2003) ‘New Labour’s Double-Shuffle’, Soundings, 24, 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. and Wellman, B. (2003) ‘Neighbouring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb’, City and Community, 2(4), 277–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, D. and Atkinson, H. (2011) ‘The Localism Agenda’, Local Economy, 26(8), 625–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A. (2010) Mind the Gap: Assessing the Impact of Reduced Government Spending on the North East Economy. Newcastle: One North East.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. (2004) ‘Governing the Cities and the Urban Renaissance’. In C. Johnstone and M. Whitehead (eds) New Horizons in British Urban Policy: Perspectives on New Labour’s Urban Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 129–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaščák, O. and Pupala, B. (2011) ‘Governmentality — Neoliberalism — Education: The Risk Perspective’, Journal of Pedagogy, 2(2), 145–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecan, E. (2008) ‘Bringing Lost Sheep into the Fold: Questioning the Discourse of the Digital Divide’, Information Technology and People, 21(3), 267–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (2011) ‘Why Business Can’t Afford to Ignore the 9 Million’, National Digital Conference, London, UK 12 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane-Fox, M. (2011) Race Online 2012: Manifesto for a Networked Nation. London: Office of the Digital Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2009) ‘Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social’, Theory, Culture and Society, 26(6), 110–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, S. (2006) Leitch Review of Skills: Prosperity for all in the Global Economy — World Class Skills. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2007) ‘An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessenich, S. (2011) ‘Constructing the Social Self: Mobilisation and Control in the “Active Society”’. In U. Brockling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke (eds) Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 304–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1999) New Labour and Social Exclusion — Citizenship and Social Exclusion Panel. Bristol: University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2006) ‘Sociology and Risk’. In G. Mythen and S. Walklate (eds) Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, K. (2010) ‘Social Inclusion Policy: Producing Justice or Retribution?’ Journal of Social Inclusion, 1(2), 133–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, H. (2006) ‘E-Government in Britain — A Decade On’, Parliamentary Affairs, 59(11), 250–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maude, R (2011) National Digital Inclusion Conference, London, 13 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, J. (2001) ‘The End of Social Exclusion? On Information Technology Policy as a Key to Social Inclusion in Large European Cities’, Regional Studies, 35(9), 861–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuaid, R. W., Lindsay, C. and Greig, M. (2004) ‘“Reconnecting” the Unemployed: Information and Communication Technology and Services for Jobseekers in Rural Areas’, Information, Communication and Society, 7(3), 364–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. (2009) Independent Review of ICT User Skills. London: Department of Business Innovation and Skills.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation (2011) Cutting It: The ‘Big Society’ and the New Austerity. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (2001a) ‘National Education Policy Constructions of the “Knowledge Economy”: Towards a Critique’, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (2001b) ‘Education, Enterprise Culture and the Entrepreneurial Self: A Foucauldian Perspective’, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy Action Team (PAT) 15 (2000) Closing the Digital Divide: Information and Communication Technologies in Deprived Areas. London: DTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, L. (2000) ‘New Communication Technology: A Conduit for Social Exclusion?’ Information Communication and Society, 3(1), 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009) Champion for Digital Inclusion — The Economic Case for Digital Inclusion, http://www.parliamentandinternet.org.uk/uploads/Final_report.pdf [Accessed 17 November 2011].

  • Race Online 2012 (2011) ‘100,000 Volunteers to Help Get Millions More Online by the Olympics Press Release’, 11 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M. and Imrie, R. (2000) ‘Governmentality and Rights and Responsibilities in Urban Policy’, Environment and Planning A, 32, 2187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. and O’Reilly, K. (1998) The ESRC Review of Government Social Classifications. London/Swindon: ONS/ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2002) Defining the’Digital Divide’: Developing a Theoretical Understanding oflnequalities in an Information Age, Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide’, New Media and Society, 6(3), 341–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008) ‘The Use of ICTs in Education and the Promotion of Social Inclusion: A Critical Perspective from the UK’, Educação & Sociedade, 29(104), 815–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, K. (2008) ‘Neo-Liberalism, Risk and Spatial Governance in the Developmental State: Japanese Planning in the Global Economy’, Critical Planning, 15, 92–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit (2001) Preventing Social Exclusion: A Report by the Social Exclusion Unit. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) New Risks, New Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2007) ‘Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism’, Open Democracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/responsibility_and_neo_liberalism [Accessed 13 October 2011].

  • UK Government (1999) Modernising Government White Paper. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (2005a) Connecting the UK: Digital Strategy. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (2005b) Transformational Government: Enabled by Technology. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (2006) Inclusion through Innovation: Tackling Social Exclusion through New Technologies. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government (2008) Delivering Digital Inclusion-An Action Plan for Consultation. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Online Centres (2007) Transformational Government for the Citizen. London: Simpson Carpenter.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Online Centres (2009) Does the Internet Improve Lives? London: Fresh Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2006) ‘Can ICT Reduce Social Exclusion? The Case of an Adults’ English Language Learning Programme’, British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Clayton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sunderland, UK

    Jeremy Kearney  & Catherine Donovan  & 

Copyright information

© 2013 John Clayton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clayton, J. (2013). Technologies of Power? Constructing Digital Exclusion, Risk and Responsibility. In: Kearney, J., Donovan, C. (eds) Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276087_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation