Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
Political Reason
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Can and should political philosophy be carried on ‘in the manner of’ the Enlightenment? In this book we examined the Enlightenment commitments to scepticism and moral equality, and the idea that morality-as-such and reason-as-such should be pre-eminent in our political reasoning. In contrast, for one school of thought, historicism, the Enlightenment was a failure because it encouraged the false belief that reason and morality are not constituted by tradition. For MacIntyre, reason and morality must be re-connected with the ‘settled convictions’ of a community where there is a consensus on the hierarchical ordering of goods. MacIntyre’s rejection of the Enlightenment commitments to moral equality and scepticism is illustrated by his small-scale (non-State) communitarianism and his historicist epistemology and moral theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Allyn Fives

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fives, A. (2013). Conclusions. In: Political Reason. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291622_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics