Abstract
This chapter identifies the absence of scholarly interest in determining the role of the bureaucrat in sustaining conflict management mechanisms. It finds that conflict management research has much to learn from public administration research within uncontested societies. It is not sufficient to understand what policies to implement, nor is it sufficient to understand the structures that are conducive to good governance: scholarship must also extend to understanding how elite level bureaucrats influence/skew policies and decision-making processes. What follows is a review of existing empirical research useful for understanding the role of the bureaucracy in conflict management. It is expected that this chapter will inform the reader on the nature of existing bureaucratic governance research within contested environments, shedding light on potential avenues of further research and current problems facing professional administrators in ethnically and culturally divided societies. Incorporating both conflict management research and public administration research, the need for a greater understanding of how bureaucratic mechanisms are exploited by the bureaucrat becomes more apparent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Karl O’Connor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Connor, K. (2014). Representative Bureaucracy in Plural Societies. In: Public Administration in Contested Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298157_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298157_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45230-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29815-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)