Skip to main content

Conclusion: Findings

  • Chapter
Strategic Nuclear Sharing

Part of the book series: Global Issues Series ((GLOISS))

  • 472 Accesses

Abstract

The overall findings of this book are that political elites are not confident that possessing nuclear weapons will ensure peace, so are reluctant to share. The frequency of outcomes in the case studies suggests that states most often do not share because of agreements between adversarial donors not to share, followed by fears that proliferation will sunder an alliance, that states will lose their influence over others, and finally because of the dangers of escalation. In terms of the presence of a nonproliferation bargain, fear of Soviet retaliation was why the US provided covert nuclear assistance to France after 1972, allowed no more than soft sharing with Japan and India, and effectively stifled Australia’s nuclear ambitions. Soviet fear of US retaliation caused its denial of sharing with Cuba and India, as well as to large parts of the anticolonial developing world. Fear of US retaliation as part of the US-China nonproliferation bargain explains China’s cutting-off of Iran and reduced sharing to Pakistan. The Beijing-Moscow nonproliferation bargain with respect to North Korea delayed Pyongyang’s nuclear aspirations for decades, and was surprisingly broken by the US’s failure to restrain Egypt from selling the first Scud missiles to North Korea, thereby setting off a spiral of missile proliferation. French concern over the reaction of other states led it to terminate its assistance to Israel, and Soviet concern over US assistance to West Germany terminated its nuclear assistance to Beijing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. What were not tested were non-events, which are therefore cases of donors that face security threats, and would be expected to share (softly or otherwise) nuclear weapons in situations where there was no extended deterrent or nonproliferation bargain. This author has found no negative evidence to account for why sharing did not occur between Russia and Armenia, Saudi Arabia and India, or Chile and Brazil (in the 1970s), or North Korea and any other state outside of East Asia. See Philip Bleek, “Why do States Proliferate?” in William Potter and Gaukar Mukhatzhanova, eds., Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century — Vol. 1 The Role of Theory (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010), 159–192

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.T. Poulose, Nuclear Proliferation and the Third World (New Delhi, ABC Publishing House, 1982), 9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhai Zhihai, “The Future of Nuclear Weapons: A Chinese Perspective,” in Patrick J. Garrity and Steven A. Maaranen, eds., Nuclear Weapons in the Changing World: Perspectives from Europe, Asia, and North America (New York, Plemun Press, 1992), 165–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ian Bellany, Curbing the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), 53

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai Zhihai, “The Future of Nuclear Weapons: A Chinese Perspective,” in Patrick J. Garrity and Steven A. Maaranen, eds., Nuclear Weapons in the Changing World: Perspectives from Europe, Asia, and North America (NewYork: Plenum Press, 1992), 165–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin Frankel, “The Brooding Shadows: Systemic Incentives and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation,” in Zachary S. Davies and Benjamin Frankel, eds., The Proliferation Puzzle (London: Frank Cass, 1993), 37–78

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scott D. Sagan, “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security 21, no.3 (Winter 1996/1997), 54–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. James J. Wirtz, “Beyond Bipolarity: Prospects for Nuclear Stability after the Cold War,” in T.V. Paul, Richard J. Harknett, and James J. Wirtz, eds., The Absolute Weapon Revisited: Nuclear Arms and the Emerging International Order (Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1998), 137–166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carolyn James, “Nuclear Arsenal Games: Coping with Proliferation in a World of Changing Rivalries,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33, no.4 (December 2000), 723–746.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jing-dong Yuan, “India’s Rise after Pokhran II: Chinese Analyses and Assessments,” Asian Survey 41, no.6 (November–December 2001), 978–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaim Braun and Christopher F. Chyba, “Proliferation Rings: New Challenges to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime,” International Security 29, no.2, (Fall 2004), 5–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jack Caravelli, Beyond Sand and Oil (Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2011), 152.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michael Malley and Tanya Ogilvie-White, “Nuclear Capabilities in Southeast Asia,” The Nonproliferation Review 16, no.1 (March 2009), 25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Malley, “Prospects for Nuclear Proliferation in Southeast Asia 20062010,” The Nonproliferation Review 13, no.3 (November 2006), 605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon G. Chang, Nuclear Showdown: North Korea Takes over the World (New York: Random House, 2006), 128

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sumit Ganguly, “India’s Pathway to Pokhram II: The Prospects and Sources of New Delhi Nuclear Weapons Program,” International Security 23, no.4 (Spring 1999), 148–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. George Quester, Nuclear First Strike (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paul Kerr and Mary Beth Nikitin, “Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and Security Issues,” in Nathan Cohen, ed., Nuclear Ambitions and Issues in the Middle East (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010), 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paul Kerr and Mary Beth Nikitin, “Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and Security Issues,” in Nathan Cohen, ed., Nuclear Ambitions and Issues in the Middle East (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010), 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prominent cases of nuclear smuggling from the former Soviet Union: 1993: Murmansk, naval officer stole 4.5 kg of HEU; 1994: Munich airport: small amount of stolen plutonium was recovered; 1994: Prague, police seized 2.7 kg of Russian HEU; 1998: Russian police stop a plot to steal 18.5 kg of HEU from a Chelyabinsk nuclear laboratory; 2006: Oleg Khinsagov is arrested in Georgia with a small quantity of 80 per cent HEU. See Paul Kerr and Mary Beth Nikitin, “Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and Security Issues,” in Nathan Cohen, ed., Nuclear Ambitions and Issues in the Middle East (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010), 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mark J. Valencia, The Proliferation Security Initiative: Making Waves in Asia (New York: Routledge, 2005), 58

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ian Bellany, Curbing the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), 13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paul Levine and Ron Smith, “Arms Export Controls and Proliferation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, no.6 (December 2000), 885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. William W. Kellar, “‘Globalization’ and Nonproliferation: Security and Technology at a Crossroad?” in Janne E. Nolan, Bernard I. Finel, and Brian D. Finlay, eds., Ultimate Security, Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction, (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2003), 177–202

    Google Scholar 

  25. Joseph Cirincione, “Addressing Proliferation through Multilateral Agreement: Success and Failure in the Nonproliferation Regime,” in Janne E. Nolan, Bernard I. Finel, and Brian D. Finlay, eds., Ultimate Security: Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2003), 47–74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Christopher Clary, “A.Q. Khan, Proliferation Networks, and the Nuclear Slippery Slope,” in James Russell, ed., Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle East: Directions and Policy Options in the New Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scott Sagan, “The Perils of Proliferation in South Asia,” Asian Survey 41, no. 6 (November–December 2001), 1064–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenneth N. Waltz, “More May Be Better,” in Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003), 3–45

    Google Scholar 

  29. Benjamin Frankel, “The Brooding Shadows: Systemic Incentives and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation,” in Zachary S. Davies and Benjamin Frankel, eds., The Proliferation Puzzle (London: Frank Cass, 1993), 37–78

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon Heyd Evans, “The World of Nuclear Plenty,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 19, no.2 (February 1963), 26–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Julian Schofield

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schofield, J. (2014). Conclusion: Findings. In: Strategic Nuclear Sharing. Global Issues Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298454_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics