Skip to main content
  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

By the end of the 1920s, the wholesale commodification of x-rays and radium had made them ubiquitous. Nonscientist Americans could and did interact with them physically, intellectually, and rhetorically. Some were indifferent, and many had retained through those first few decades the vague dread or acute fear that had been part of the spectrum of reactions from the start. Those misgivings might be the result of specific fears having to do with the direct experience of irradiation itself. They might also be due to a wounded sense of Victorian propriety, a reaction against a new physics that seemed daily more metaphysical, or a manifestation of the broader antimodern sentiment that had not only Soddy in its sights but also Joyce, Stravinsky, and Picasso. For the most part, though, science and medicine were held in high regard, and by virtue of decades of popular science writing, x-rays and radioactivity were more than ever the emblems of those disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Claudia Clark, Radium Girls: Women and Industrial Health Reform, 1910–1935 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross Mullner, Deadly Glow: The Radium Dial Worker Tragedy (Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1999), 94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. William Kovarik, “The Radium Girls,” in Mass Media and Environmen tal Conflict, William Kovarik and Mark Neuzil, eds. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996). Cf. revised edition (2002), http://www.runet.edu/%7Ewkovarik/envhist/radium.html. Accessed December 11, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacalyn Duffin and Charles R. R. Hayter, “Baring the Sole: The Rise and Fall of the Shoe-Fitting Fluoroscope,” Isis 91, no. 2 (June 2000): 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. David J. DiSantis and Denise M. DiSantis, “Radiologic History Exhibit: Wrong Turns on Radiology’s Road of Progress,” RadioGraphics 11, no. 6 (November 1991): 1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rebecca Herzig, “Removing Roots: ‘North American Hiroshima Maidens’ and the X Ray,” Technology and Culture 40, no. 4 (1999): 737–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Otto Juettner, Modern Physio-Therapy: A System of Drugless Therapeutic Methods, Including a Chapter on X-Ray Diagnosis (Cincinnati: Harvey, 1906), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albert Abrams, Diagnostic Therapeutics: A Guide for Practitioners in Diagnosis by and of Drugs and Methods Other Than Drug-Giving (New York: Rebman, 1910), 180.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tilman Howard Plank, A Treatise on Actinic-Ray Therapy, for Physicians Interested in Physical Therapeutics (Chicago: Manz Corporation, 1919), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. William Beaumont, Infra-Red Radiation (London: H. K. Lewis, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Russ and Hector A. Colwell, X-Ray and Radium Injuries: Prevention and Treatment (London: Oxford University Press, 1935), 185.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Mok, “Radium, Life-Giving Element, Deals Death in Hands of Quacks,” Popular Science Monthly 131, July 1932, 9–11, 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan D. Marché II, Theaters of Time and Space: American Planetaria 1930–1970 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005), 80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapter four (“The Empire of Science”) of Robert Rydell, World of Fairs: The Century-of-Progress Expositions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elof Carlson, Genes, Radiation and Society: The Life and Work of H. J. Muller (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981), 150.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alexander Snyder, “Blasphemer’s Plateau,” Amazing Stories 1, no. 7 (October 1926): 656–671.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmond Hamilton, “The Man Who Solved Death,” Science Fiction 1, no. 3 (August 1939): 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lloyd Arther Eshbach, “Dust,” Marvel Science Stories 2, no. 2 (November 1940): 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  19. John L. Chapman, “Cycle,” Marvel Science Stories 2, no. 2 (November 1940): 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warren Sanders, “The Sterile World,” Wonder Stories Quarterly 3, no. 3 (Spring 1932): 408.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Lawrence Badash, Elizabeth Hodes, and Adolph Tiddens, “Nuclear Fission: Reaction to the Discovery in 1939,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 130, no. 2 (June 1986): 212.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edward P. Sumers, Science Fiction Magazine 2, no. 4 (April 1941): 59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robert Heinlein, “Blowups Happen,” Astounding Science Fiction 25, no. 7 (September 1940): 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Clute and Peter Nichols, The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alan L. Hart, These Mysterious Rays: A Nontechnical Discussion of the Uses of X-Rays and Radium, Chiefly in Medicine (New York: Harper, 1943), 151.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henry K. Pancoast, “The Therapeutic Effects of the X-Rays, as Shown from the Results of Treatment of Nearly One Hundred Cases,” Archives of Electrology and Radiology 4 (1904), 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. S. O’Hara, “Looking Backward,” Radiography & Clinical Photography 8 (May-June 1932): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Israel Klein, “Science Tries to Equal Radium’s Terrific Power by Electricity,” NEA Service (January 5, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  29. John E. Lodge, “Giant X-Ray Machines: Science’s Siege Guns in War on Disease,” Popular Science, April 1937, 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Matthew Lavine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lavine, M. (2013). Backlash. In: The First Atomic Age. Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307224_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307224_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45547-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30722-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics