Abstract
Surveillance Schools undermine privacy, disrupt interactions premised on trust and in some instances even expedite the transition of pupils from the school to the prison. There are examples of student resistance to surveillance but this is responded to with exclusion, marginalisation and coercion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hope, A. (2010) ’Student resistance to the surveillance curriculum’, International Studies in Sociology of Education 20 (4): 319–34, p. 322.
Feeley, M. (2003) ‘Crime, social order and the rise of neo-Conservative politics’, Theoretical Criminology 7 (1): 111–30, p. 118.
For example, see; Gallagher, M. (2010) ‘Are schools Panoptic?’, Surveillance & Society 7 (3/4): 262–72
Kupchik, A. (2010) Homeroom Security: School Discipline in An Age of Fear. New York: New York University Press
Mccahill, M. and Finn, R. (2010), ‘The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: “angels”, “devils” and “teen mums”’, Surveillance & Society 7 (3/4): 273–89
Taylor, E. (2010) ‘I spy with my little eye: the use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy’, Sociological Review 58 (3): 381–405
Weiss, J., (2008) Under the Radar: School Surveillance and Youth Resistance. The City University of New York.
Michael, J. (1994) Privacy and Human Rights. Hampshire: Dartmout Publishing Company Ltd.
Wacks, R. (1980) The Protection of Privacy. London: Sweet & Maxwell, p. 10.
Michael, J. (1994).
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin, p. 32.
Robertson, A.H. (1973) Privacy and Human Rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 3.
Westin, A. (1967) Privacy and Freedom. New York: Antheneum, p. 7.
See for example; Ingham, R. (1978) ‘Privacy and psychology’, in J. Young (ed.), Privacy. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
See for example; Fried, C. (1971) An Anatomy of Values: Problems of Personal and Social Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
See for example; Gerstein, R. (1984) ‘Intimacy and privacy’, in F. Schoeman (eds), Philosophical Dimensions Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michael, J. (1994).
Bennett, C. and Raab, C. (2007) ‘The privacy paradigm’, in S.P. Hier and J. Greenberg (eds), The Surveillance Studies Reader. Berkshire: Open University Press, p. 340.
Stalder, F. (2002) ‘Opinion: Privacy is not the antidote to surveillance’, Surveillance & Society 1 (1): 120–24, p. 122.
Warnick, R. (2010) ’Surveillance cameras in schools: an ethical analysis’, Harvard Educational Review 77 (3): 317–43, p. 323.
For example, see; Mccahill, M. and Finn, R. (2010); Taylor, E. (2010).
For example, see: Barnard-Wills, D. (2012) ‘E-safety education: young people, surveillance and responsibility’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 12 (3): 239–55
Hope, A. (2008) ‘Internet pollution discourses, exclusionary practices and the “culture of over-blocking” within UK schools’, Technology, Pedagogy and Education 17 (2): 103–13.
Sykes, C.J. (1999) The End of Privacy: The Attack on Personal Rights–at Home, at Work, on-Line and in Court. New York: St Martin’s Griffin, p. 13.
Groombridge, N. (2002) ‘Crime control or crime culture TV?’, Surveillance & Society 1 (1): 30–46, p. 43.
Whitaker, R. (1999) The End of Privacy: How Total Surveillance is Becoming a Reality. New York: New Press, p. 139.
Bauman, Z. and Lyon, D. (2013) Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 34.
Steeves, V. (2012) ‘Hide and seek: surveillance of young people on the internet’, in D. Lyon, K.D. Haggerty, and K. Ball (eds), The International Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Oxon: Routledge, 352–60, p. 356.
Bauman, Z. and Lyon, D. (2013), p. 23.
Ibid., p. 24.
Orenstein, P., ‘I Tweet, therefore I am’, The New York Times, 30 July 2010.
boyd, D. and Marnick, A. (2011) ’social steganography: privacy in networked publics’, Paper presented at ICA on 28 May 2011, Boston, MA.
Steeves, V. (2012).
Ericson, V. and Haggerty, K.D. (1997) Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 117.
Crawford, A. (2000) ’Situational crime prevention, urban governance and trust relations’, in A. Von Hirsch, D. Garland, and A. Wakefield (eds), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 209.
Giroux, H.A. (2003) ‘Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (4): 553–65, p. 554.
CBBC ‘Does CCTV make you feel safer?’, Newsround, 1 June 2007. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_6700000/ newsid_6700500/6700513.stm (accessed 08 April 2013).
CBBC’ should kids get fingerprinted?’, BBC Newsround, 25 July 2002. http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/chat/your_comments/ newsid_2146000/2146389.stm (accessed 08 April 2013).
Ruck, M., Harris, A., Fine, M., and Freudenberg, N. (2008) ‘Youth experiences of surveillance: a cross-national analysis’, in M. Flynn and D.C. Brotherton (eds), Globalizing the Streets: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Youth, Social Control, and Empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press, 15–30, p. 16.
Echo (2009) ‘Teenage boys and the media’, www.womeninjournalism.co.uk (accessed: 09 April 2013).
Bawden cited in Garner, R., ‘“Hoodies, louts, scum”: how media demonises teenagers’, The Independent, 13 March 2009.
Lyons, J., ‘Hoodie hell on streets every 8 secs’, Mirror, 4 February 2009.
‘Hoodie Allowed to Break ASBO 16 Times Before Finally Being Sent To Prison’, Mail Online, 6 November 2007.
For example, see Coleman, R. (2004) Reclaiming the Streets: Surveillance, Social Control and the City. Devon: Willan publishing.
Quoted in Barkham, P., ‘How a top can turn a teen into a hoodlum’, The Guardian, 14 May 2005.
Muzzati, S.L. (2004) ‘Criminalising marginality and resistance: Marilyn Manson, Columbine and cultural criminology’, in J. Ferrell, et al. (eds), Cultural Criminology Unleashed. London: Glasshouse Press, 143–54.
Coleman, R. (2004), p. 187.
Devine, J. (1996) Maximum Security: The Culture of Violence in Inner-City Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nolan, K. and Anyon, J. (2004) ‘Learning to do time: willis’ cultural reproduction model in an era of deindustrialization, globalization, and the mass incarceration of people of color’, in N. Dolby, G. Dimitriadis, and P. Willis (eds), Learning to Labor in New Times. New York: Routledge, 114–29, p. 114.
Hirschfield, P.J. (2008) ‘Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA’, Theoretical Criminology 12: 79–101.
Skiba, R., Reynolds, C.L.R., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Conoley, J.C., and Garcia-
Vazquez, E. (2006) ‘Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations’, American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force.
Beger, R.R. (2002).
Dohrn, B. (2001) ‘“Look out kid/It’s something you did”: zero tolerance for children’, in W. Ayers, B. Dohrn, and E. Ayers (eds), Zero Tolerance: Resisting the Drive for Punishment in Our Schools. New York: The New Press, 89–113.
Fuentes, A. (2013) Lockdown High: When the Schoolhouse Becomes a Jailhouse. London: Verso.
Parenti, C. (2000) Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis. New York: Verso; Giroux, H.A. (2003); Nolan, K. and Anyon, J. (2004).
Lewis, T. (2003) ‘The surveillance economy of post-Columbine schools’, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 25 (4): 335–55, p. 36.
Simon, J. (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 225.
Duel, M., ‘Fury as school with second-highest expulsion rate in England builds “prison block” to house 12 troublemaker pupils’, The Daily Mail, 10 September 2012.
For example, see Corrigan, P. (1979) Schooling the Smash Street Kids. London: Macmillan Press
Willis, P. (1977) Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.
Apple, M. (1982) Education and Power. London: Routledge, p. 96.
Hope, A. (2005) ‘Panopticonism, play and the resistance of surveillance: case studies of the observation of student Internet use in UK schools’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 26 (3): 359–73.
Weiss, J. (2008), p. 595.
Kaliski, B.S. (no date) ‘Thoughts on Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Technology and Revelation’s “Mark of the Beast”’, http://www.infosecwriters.com/hhworld/hh10/rfid.htm (accessed 19 September 2013).
A.H. V. Northside Isd, Dkt. No. Sa-12-Ca1113-Og (W.D. Tex. January 8, 2013).
Weiss, J. (2011) ‘Valuing youth resistance before and after public protest’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 24 (5): 595–99.
Weiss, J. (2008), p. 9.
Weiss, J. (2011), p. 595.
Hope, A. (2005), p. 371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Emmeline Taylor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, E. (2013). Lessons in Submission? The Societal Impacts of Surveillance Schools. In: Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education. Crime Prevention and Security Management. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308863_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308863_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45620-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30886-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)