Skip to main content

Some Lessons From CDO Markets on Mathematical Models

  • Chapter
Global Asset Management
  • 680 Accesses

Abstract

Bad mathematical models or over reliance on mathematical models is frequently cited as one of the culprits of the financial crisis. While models surely played a role, putting such a responsibility on models is giving too much credit to the influence that models have in the larger political decisions in financial institutions and in political decision making. Decisions to run banks with extreme leverage, to systematically try to loosen up capital constraints using off-balance sheet vehicles, searching-for-yield behavior by institutional and private investors, political desires to increase house ownership even at the cost of increasing riskiness in lending — these decisions are not deeply rooted in models. When they are, one is suspicious that the model selection has often been such that the decisions were justified in the selected models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brennan, M., Hein, J. and Poon, S. (2009) ‘Tranching and Rating’, European Financial Management, 15(5): 891–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin-Dufresne, P., Goldstein, R. and Yang, F. 2012. ‘On the Relative Pricing of long Maturity Options and Collateralized Debt Obligations’, Journal of Finance, 67(6): 1983–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coval, J., Jurek, J. and Stafford, E. (2009) ‘Economic Catastrophe Bonds’, American Economic Review, 99(3): 628–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D. and Garleanu, N. (2001) ‘Risk and Valuation of Collateralised Debt Obligations’, Financial Analysts Journal, 57(1): 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. and White, A. (2010) ‘The risk tranches created from residential mortgages’, Financial Analysts Journal, 66(5): 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kac, M. (1969) ‘Some mathematical models in science’, Science, 166(3906): 695–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kherraz, A. (2006) ‘The May 2005 correlation crisis: Did the models really fail?’, Working Paper. Imperial College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lando, D. (2004) Credit risk modelling — theory and applications. NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, F. and Rajan, A. (2008) ‘An empirical analysis of the pricing of Collateralised Debt Obligations’, Journal of Finance, 63(2): 529–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, A. (2006) ‘Semi-analytic valuation of basket credit derivatives in intensity-based models’, Journal of Derivatives, 13(4): 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemann, S. (2005) ‘An evaluation of the base correlation framework for synthetic CDOs’, Journal of Credit Risk, 1(4): 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 SimCorp StrategyLab

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lando, D. (2013). Some Lessons From CDO Markets on Mathematical Models. In: Pinedo, M., Walter, I. (eds) Global Asset Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328878_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics