Skip to main content
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

In many of the early treatments of Chatterton a strong source of contention concerned authorship. Even though leading scholars, principally Tyrwhitt the philologist and Warton the literary historian, had quickly realized that the texts were modern concoctions, a small band of antiquaries had stubbornly refused to relinquish the fictitious fifteenth-century priest Rowley. More than anything else, authorial decorum was at stake: the works exhibited marks of ‘classical’ genius and so demanded an appropriate figurehead. Such commentators could not bear to see them attributed to an unreliable and dissolute charity-schoolboy. Paradoxically, then, the pro-Rowleians devoted reams of print to Chatterton’s life and character in the very act of excising him from the corpus. They belittled his mock-scholarship, corrected his own glosses and brought forth his private correspondence as proof of his inadequacies of character. To put it another way: far from ignoring Chatterton the antiquaries savaged him. Yet, as we have seen, they belonged to a minority. Warton, Malone, Steevens and a whole host of critics and literary pasticheurs praised the boy-poet as a unique genius, a doyen of modern antiques and a master of a new brand of Rowleyese Englishness.

Alone, unknown, the Muses darling dies, And with the vulgar dead, unnoted lies. Bright star of genius! — torn from life and fame, My tears, my verse, shall consecrate thy name!

(Hannah Cowley)1

Too proud for pity, and too poor for praise, No voice to cherish, and no hand to raise; Torn, stung, and sated, with this ‘mortal coil,’ This weary, anxious scene of fruitless toil; Not all the graces that to youth belong, Nor all the energies of sacred song; Nor all that FANCY, all that GENIUS gave, Could snatch thy wounded spirit from the grave.

(Mary Robinson)2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mary Robinson, ‘Monody to the Memory of Chatterton’, Poems by Mrs. M. Robinson, 2 vols (London: J. Bell, 1791–3), vol. 1, pp. 75–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Coleridge’s Poems: A Facsimile Reproduction, eds J. D. Campbell and W. Hale White (Westminster: A. Constable, 1899), pp. 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ann Yearsley, ‘Elegy, on Mr. Chatterton’, Poems, on Various Subjects (London: G. G.J. and J. Robinson, 1787), pp. 145–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Janet Todd, Sensibility: An Introduction (London: Methuen, 1986), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barbara M. Benedict, Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction, 1745–1800 (New York: AMS Press, 1994), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.J. Barker-Benfield, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Langford, Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1989])

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Mullan, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (London: A. Millar, 1759), p. 9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander Gerard, An Essay on Genius (London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; Edinburgh: W. Creech, 1774), pp. 71–95

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Edward Young, Conjectures on Original Composition (London: A. Millar and R. and J. Dodsley 1759), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See William H. Wandless, ‘Narrative Pain and the Moral Sense: Toward an Ethics of Suffering in the Long Eighteenth Century’, Literature and Medicine 24.1 (2005), pp. 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. William Godwin, Memoirs of the Author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, 2nd edn (London: J. Johnson and G. G. and J. Robinson, 1798), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Michel Foucault, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Random House, 1988), pp. 212–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Werter and Charlotte, a German Story (London: J. Parsons, 1786), p. iii. On the influence of Goethe’s novella on British writers see Robyn L. Schiffman, ‘A Concert of Werthers’, ECS 43.2 (2010), pp. 207–22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Charles Moore, A Full Inquiry into the Subject of Suicide, 2 vols (London: J. R and C. Rivington, 1790), vol. 2, pp. 141–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johann Wilhelm von Archenholtz (ed.), The English Lyceum, 3 vols (Hamburg, 1787–8), vol. 1, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Markman Ellis, The Politics of Sensibility: Race, Gender and Commerce in the Sentimental Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See John Brewer, ‘“Love and Madness”: Sentimental Narratives and the Spectacle of Suffering in Late-Eighteenth-Century Romance’, in Peter de Bolla, Nigel Leask and David Simpson (eds), Land, Nation and Culture, 1740–1840: Thinking the Republic of Taste (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 131–47

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maximillian E. Novak, ‘The Sensibility of Sir Herbert Croft in Love and Madness and the “Life of Edward Young”’, The Age of Johnson 8 (1997), pp. 189–207

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Miles, ‘Forging a Romantic Identity: Herbert Croft’s Love and Madness and W. H. Ireland’s Shakespeare MS’, ECF 17.4 (2005), pp. 599–627

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly McGuire, ‘True Crime: Contagion, Print Culture, and Herbert Croft’s Love and Madness; or, A Story Too True’, ECF 24 (2011), pp. 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Although informally known already, Croft’s authorship was officially acknowledged in 1782: see Robert J. Griffin, ‘Fact, Fiction, and Anonymity: Reading Love and Madness: A Story Too True (1780)’, ECF 16.4 (2004), pp. 619–37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brian Goldberg, ‘Romantic Professionalism in 1800: Robert Southey, Herbert Croft, and the Letters and Legacy of Thomas Chatterton’, ELH 63.3 (1996), pp. 681–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Michael MacDonald and Terence R. Murphy, Sleepless Souls: Suicide in Early Modern England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 144–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Brian Goldberg, The Lake Poets and Professional Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 213.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Works, vol. 2, pp. 1,079-80. J. H. Ingram, The True Chatterton (London: George G. Harrap & Company, 1910), pp. 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  28. Esther P. Ellinger, Thomas Chatterton, The Marvelous Boy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1930), pp. 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Andrew Kippis, Biographia Britannica, 2nd edn, 5 vols (London: C. Bathurst, 1778–93), vol. 3, p. viii

    Google Scholar 

  30. Giuseppe Parmi, A Fashionable Day (London: G. Kearsley and R. Faulder, 1780), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See J. J. Murphy, Children’s Handkerchiefs, a Two Hundred Year History (Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mary Schoeser, Printed Handkerchiefs (London: Museum of London, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas Park noted the resemblance to Hogarth’s print: GM 69.1 (1799), pp. 385–6. See also William L. Pressly The Artist as Original Genius: Shakespeare’s ‘Fine Frenzy’ in Late-Eighteenth-Century British Art (Delaware: University of Delaware Press, 2007), pp. 163–83.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Life, p. 475. See Richard D. Altick, The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1957), p. 176

    Google Scholar 

  35. Robert W. Uphaus, ‘Vicesimus Knox and the Canon of Eighteenth-Century Literature’, The Age of Johnson 4 (1991), pp. 345–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vicesimus Knox, ‘On Novel Reading’, Essays Moral and Literary, 2 vols (London: Edward and Charles Dilly 1778), vol. 2, pp. 185–93

    Google Scholar 

  37. John Trussler, Chronology; or, the Historian’s Vade-Mecum, 10th edn, 2 vols (London: R. Baldwin, 1782), vol. 2, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  38. David Erskine Baker, Biographia Dramatica, or, a Companion to the Playhouse, 2 vols (London: Mess. Rivingtons, T. Payne and Son, L. Davis et al., 1782), vol. 1, pp. 73–4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mrs Bonhote, The Parental Monitor, 2 vols (London: William Lane, 1788), vol. 2, pp. 106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. John Paterson Service, Recreation for Youth (London: G. Kearsley, 1787), pp. 116–17.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joseph Robertson, The Parian Chronicle (London: J. Walter, 1788), pp. 203–5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Charles Gower, The Lounger’s Miscellany (London: T and J. Egerton, 1788–9), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vicesimus Knox, ‘On the Old English Poets’, Essays Moral and Literary, 2nd edn, 2 vols (London: Edward and Charles Dilly, 1779), vol. 1, p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vicesimus Knox, ‘On the Poems attributed to Rowley’, Essays Moral and Literary, 3rd edn, 2 vols (London: Charles Dilly, 1782), vol. 2, pp. 247–51

    Google Scholar 

  45. Richard Terry, Poetry and the Making of the English Literary Past, 1660–1781 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 311.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Erik Erämetsä, A Study of the’ sentimental’ and of other Linguistic Characteristics of Eighteenth Century Sentimentalism in England (Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica, 1951), pp. 85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Knox, ‘An Idea of a Patriot’, Essays (1782), vol. 1, pp. 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knox, ‘On the Advantage which may be derived to the Tender and Pathetic Style, from using the Words and Phrases of Scripture’, Essays (1782), vol. 2, pp. 286–9

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vicesimus Knox, The Works of Vicesimus Knox, D.D., 7 vols (London: J. Mawman, 1824), vol. 1, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. G. Constable, John Flaxman: 1755–1826 (London: University of London Press, 1927), p. 25

    Google Scholar 

  51. David Irwin, John Flaxman 1755–1826: Sculptor, Illustrator, Designer (London: Studio Vista, 1979), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sarah Symmons, ‘The Spirit of Despair: Patronage, Primitivism and the Art of John Flaxman’, Burlington Magazine 117 (1975), pp. 644–50.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Philip Thicknesse, Memoirs and Anecdotes of Philip Thicknesse, 2 vols (London: Printed for the author, 1788–90), vol. 2, pp. 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Richard Jenkins, The Ode, Songs, Chorusses, &c. for the concert in commemoration of Chatterton, the celebrated Bristol poet (London: J. Bew, 1784), pp. 11

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robert W. Jones, ‘We Proclaim our Darling Son’: The Politics of Chatterton’ s Memory during the War for America’, RES 53 (2002), pp. 373–95.

    Google Scholar 

  56. See Thomas Lockwood, Post-Augustan Satire: Charles Churchill and Satirical Poetry 1750–1800 (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1979), pp. 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  57. T S. Surr, George Barnwell: a novel, 3 vols (London: H. D. Symonds, 1798), vol. 1, p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  58. James Boswell, The Life of Samuel Johnson, 3rd edn, 4 vols (London: Charles Dilly, 1799), vol. 4, p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  59. George Gregory, The Life of Thomas Chatterton (London: G. Kearsley, 1789), p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Isaac D’Israeli, An Essay on the Manners and Genius of the Literary Character (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1795), p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Robert Fellowes suggested that Chatterton’s ‘sensations are so tremblingly delicate’, but explicitly chastised unfeeling patrons such as Walpole for his demise: MMr 8 (1799), pp. 143–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Daniel Cook

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cook, D. (2013). ‘Too proud for pity’: The Sentimental Reader. In: Thomas Chatterton and Neglected Genius, 1760–1830. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137332493_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics