Skip to main content

Comparative Advantage: The Silver Bullet of Industrial Policy

  • Chapter
The Industrial Policy Revolution I

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Throughout human history, people have held their political leaders responsible for the general social and economic conditions of their nations. Fairly or unfairly, some leaders have been hailed as national heroes while others have been thrown out of power or even punished more harshly depending on the level of collective happiness or anger. But never in modern history has the leader of an industrialized country been convicted by courts for his stewardship of the national economy. Yet, that is what happened recently when former Iceland Prime Minister Geir Haarde was prosecuted and found guilty of failing to manage his country’s economy appropriately prior to and during the 2008 global crisis. While he was cleared for the most serious charges and barely escaped jail sentence, his reputation and political legacy were forever tarnished. The irony of the story is that he had long been viewed as instrumental in transforming Iceland from a fishing and whaling backwater into an international financial powerhouse before the global crisis.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2002) Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective, NBER Working Paper 8831 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D. (1994) “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109, pp. 465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A.H. (1989) Asia’s Next Giant (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962) “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in NBER (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Economic and Social Factors (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. and Chakravarty, S. (1969) “Contributions to Indian Economic Analysis: A Survey,” The American Economic Review (AER), vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 2–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. and Spencer, B. (1986) “Rationales for Strategic Trade Policy and Industrial olicy,” in P. Krugman (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2003) Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (London: Anthem Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenery H.B. (1961) “Comparative Advantage and Development Policy,” American Economic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, 18–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, New Series, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (2006) “Theoretical Foundations of Industrial Policy,” EIB Papers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. and Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2009) “Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries,” in D. Rodrik (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 4 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechscher, E.R and Ohlin, B. (1991). Hechscher-Ohlin Trade Theory (trans, ed. Introd. H. Flam and M.J. Flanders) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. (1986) “An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development,” Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 527–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1974) “The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1993) “Protection in Developing Countries,” in R. Dombusch (ed.), Policymaking in the Open Economy: Concepts and Case Studies in Economic Performance (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991) Geography and Trade (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai. D. and Myint, H. (1996) The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity and Growth: A Comparative Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2009) Boulevard of Broken Dreams. Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneur ship and Venture Capital Have Failed-and What to Do About It (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. (1989) “An Economic Theory of Institutional Change: Induced and Imposed Change,” Cato Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. (2009) Economic Development and Transition: Thought, Strategy, and Viability (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. and Li, F. (2009) Development Strategy, Viability, and Economic Distortions in Developing Counties. Policy Research Working Paper 4906 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. and Monga, C. (2011) “Growth Identification and Facilitation: The Role of the State in the Dynamics of Structural Change,” Development Policy Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 259–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. and Monga, C. (2014) “The Evolving Paradigms of Structural Change,” in Bruce Currie-Alder, Ravi Kanbur, David M. Malone, and Rohinton Medhora (eds), International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. and Tan, G. (1999) “Policy Burdens, Accountability, and the Soft Budget Constraint,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 426–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, Friedrich, Matile, G.-A., Richelot, Henri, and Colwell, Stephen (1856) National System of Political Economy (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1989) “Industrialization and the Big Push,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1003–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1995) “Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nester, W. (1997) American Industrial Policy: Free or Managed Markets (London: Macmillan Press Ltd).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History (New York: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1994) “Is Inequality Harmful to Growth?,” American Economic Review, vol. 38, pp. 765–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1950) The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems (New York: United Nations). Reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America, vol. 7, no. 1, February 1962, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1963) The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.A. and Torvik, R. (2005) “White Elephants,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 89, pp. 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2010) “The Return of Industrial Policy,” Project Syndicate, April 12,2010. Available onlineat http://www.project-syndicate.org/conxmentary/the-return-of-industrial-policy.

  • Rodrik, D. (2004) Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century, John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1960) The Choice of Technique: An Aspect of the Theory of Planned Economic Development. (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. (1950) “The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Bonowing Countries,” American Economic Review, vol. 40, pp. 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1984) “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,” Econometrica, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market (Princeton, NT: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1995) Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, J.Y., Monga, C. (2013). Comparative Advantage: The Silver Bullet of Industrial Policy. In: Stiglitz, J.E., Lin, J.Y. (eds) The Industrial Policy Revolution I. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics