Abstract
Massive deforestation and degradation of forest conditions have been taking place in developing countries for several decades.1 Since the capacity of governments to protect and manage forests are limited, and the incentives to do so are even more so, state-owned forests tend to become severely degraded (Somanathan, 1991; Ostrom, 1990; Jodha, 2001). An alternative system is community management even though the forest may be owned by the state, as in the case of Nepal. Since the protection of forests is often costly, however, socially excessive extraction of resources, or the ‘free rider’ problem, may arise under community management, which may lead to ‘the tragedy of the commons’, as described by Hardin (1968). Such a bleak scenario, however, is not inevitable. In particular, if secure property rights on forests are provided to the community, it may then have incentives to protect and manage forests effectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baland, J., Bardhan, P., Das, S. and Mookherjee, D. (2010) ‘Forests to the People: Decentralization and Forest Degradation in the Indian Himalayas’, World Development, 38(11), 1642–56.
Baland, J. and Platteau, J.-P. (1996) Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role of Rural Communities? (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Bromley, D.W. (1992) “The Commons, Property, and Common-Property Regimes’, in D.W. Bromley (ed.), Making the Commons Work (San Francisco: ICS Press).
Edmonds, E. (2002) ‘Government-Initiated Community Resource Management and Local Extraction form Nepal’s Forests’, Journal of Development Economics, 68, 89–115.
Gautam, A.P., Shivakoti, G.P. and Webb, E.L. (2004) ‘A Review of Forest Policies, Institutions, and Changes in the Resources Condition in Nepal’, International Forestry Review, 6(2), 136–48.
Gilmour, D.A. and Fisher R.J. (1991) Villagers, Forests and Foresters: A Philosophy, Process and Practices of Community Forestry in Nepal (Tripureswor, Kathmandu, Nepal: Sahayogi Press).
Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, 1243–8.
Hayami, Y. (1997) Development Economics: From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hobley, M. (1985) ‘Common Property Does Not Cause Deforestation’, Journal of Forestry, 83, 663–4.
Hobley, M. (1996) ‘Participatory Forestry: The Process of Change in India and Nepal’, Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3, Overseas Development Institute, London.
Jodha, N.S. (2001) ‘Common Property Resources and the Rural Poor’, Economic Political Weekly 21, 1169–81.
Joshi, A.L. (1993) ‘Effects on Administration of Changed Forest Policies in Nepal’, in K. Warner and H. Wood (eds), Policy ana Legislation Overseas Development Institute in Community Forestry, Proceedings of a Workshop held in Bangkok.
Mahat, T.B.S., Griffin, D.M. and Shepherd, K.R. (1986) ‘Human Impacts on Some Forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal: Part 1. Forestry in the Context of the Traditional Resources of the State’, Mountain Research ana Development, 6, 223–32.
Ojha, H., Persha, L. and Chhatre, A. (2009) ‘Community Forestry in Nepal: A Policy Innovation for Local Livelihoods’, IFPRI Discussion Paper 0913.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Otsuka, K. and Place, F. (2001) Land Tenure ana Natural Resource Management: A Comparative Study of Agrarian Communities in Asia and Africa (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Pokharel, B.K. (1997) ‘Foresters and Villagers in Connection and Impacts’, Ph.D. Thesis (Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia).
Regmi, R.R. (1994) ‘Deforestation and Rural Society in the Nepalese Terai’, Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology, Volume 4.
Sakurai, T, Rayamajhi, S., Pokharel, R. and Otsuka, K. (2004) ‘Efficiency of Timber Production in Community and Private Forestry in Nepal’, Environment and Development Economics, 9(4), 539–61.
Somanathan, E. (1991) ‘Deforestation, Property Rights and Incentives in the Central Himalayas’, Economics and Political Weekly, 26, 37–46.
Tachibana T, Upadhyaya, H.K., Pokharel, R., Rayamajhi, S. and Otsuka, K. (2001) ‘Common Property Forest Management in the Hill Region of Nepal’, in K. Otsuka and F. Palace (eds), Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management: A Comparative Study of Agrarian Communities in Asia and Africa (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Narayan Raj Poudel, Nobuhiko Fuwa and Keijiro Otsuka
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poudel, N.R., Fuwa, N., Otsuka, K. (2013). From Deforestation to Reforestation: The Evolution of Community Forest Management in the Dang District of Nepal. In: Holden, S.T., Otsuka, K., Deininger, K. (eds) Land Tenure Reform in Asia and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343819_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46586-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34381-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)