Skip to main content
  • 1028 Accesses

Abstract

This book began with a detailed examination of the Ramage case (see Introduction). It is arguably one of the most infamous examples of the failings of the provocation defence. This was never clearer than in the Victorian criminal justice system where in the wake of the conviction and sentencing of James Ramage legal practitioners, members of the community and policy makers struggled to understand how a jury in the 21st century could have returned a verdict of manslaughter by reason of provocation, partially excusing the lethal actions committed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Kate Fitz-Gibbon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2014). Abolishing Provocation — The Victorian Experience. In: Homicide Law Reform, Gender and the Provocation Defence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137357557_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics