Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Global Knowledge Reservoirs on the Productivity of Multinational Enterprise: The Role of International Depth and Breadth

  • Chapter
The Multinational Enterprise and the Emergence of the Global Factory

Abstract

This study rests upon the premise that differences in the productivity performance of multinational enterprises (MNEs) stem from variations in their ability to access and combine globally distributed knowledge reservoirs within one organization. Its contribution lies in demonstrating that this important source of variation is determined by (a) the idiosyncratic manner in which the MNE’s network of subsidiaries is structured, (b) the international breadth and depth of this network and (c) its location choices in the global landscape. We find that when multinationals spread their operations across many geographical markets, they benefit from knowledge externalities more than when they concentrate their activities in few countries. We further show that the ability to exploit spatially distant knowledge depends not only on idiosyncrasies specific to the MNE, but also on exogenous forces associated with international variations in appropriability regimes and industryspecific technological opportunities. As our study considers how the subsidiaries of the MNE collectively influence the productivity of the entire group, it captures complementarities and synergies within the group, and deepens understanding of how MNE-specific and location bound factors jointly shape performance outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J.D., Jaffe, A.B., 1996. Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. The RAND Journal of Economics 27 (4), 700–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcácer, J., Chung, W., 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science 53 (5), 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., Pantzalis, C., 1996. Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 633–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., Kogut, B., 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science 45 (7), 905–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N.S., 1996. Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management Journal 17, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N.S., Silverman, B.S., 2004. R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 25, 929–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P., 1992. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organization Science 3 (1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W.L., Scott, J.T., 1987. Market Structure and Technological Change. Harwood Academic Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T., Coe, D., Helpman, E., 1999. R&D spillovers and global growth. Journal of International Economics 47, 399–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A., 2009. Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy 38, 318–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R., Zou, J., 2009. Real options and foreign affiliate divestments: a portfolio perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 40, 600–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Albu, M., 1999. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development 27 (9), 1715–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J.I., Mohnen, P., 1998. International R&D spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. Journal of International Economics 44, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R.A., 1981. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal 2 (4), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Strategic Management Journal 23 (4), 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L., 2001. Are knowledge spillovers international of intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan. Journal of International Economics 53 (1), 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., Carter, M.J., 2004. A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., Piscitello, L., 2000. Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (1), 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R., 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26, 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capar, N., Kotabe, M., 2003. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (4), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52 (1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., Nault, B.R., 2007. Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Science 53 (8), 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, W., Alcácer, J., 2002. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science 48 (12), 1534–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B., Griliches, Z., 1984. Productivity and R&D at the firm level in French manufacturing. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 393–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D., Helpman, E., 1995. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39, 859–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 (1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., Cool, K., 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35 (12), 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M., 1993. Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies 14 (3), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Pasquali, C., 2006. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy 35, 1110–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escribano, A., Tribó, A., Fosfuri, J.A., 2009. Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy 38, 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, S.E., Gupta, A.K., 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 25, 823–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, J.H., 2003. Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm. Research Policy 32, 1381–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T.S., 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2), 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W., da Costa, R.C., 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal 10, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, L., Ramaswamy, K., 1999. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies 30 (1), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, A., Suzuki, K., 1989. R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D on Japanese manufacturing industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (4), 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review 35 (3), 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V., 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., Macmillan, I.C., 1985. Efficiency of product R&D in business units: the role of strategic context. Academy of Management Journal 28 (3), 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., 2000. R&D spillovers, technological proximity, and productivity growth—evidence from German panel data. Schmalenbach Business Review 52, 238–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Kim, H., 1997. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40 (4), 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, B., Wakasugi, R., 2007. What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence. Research Policy 36, 1275–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, T., Odagiri, H., 2004. Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US. Research Policy 33, 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafouros, M.I., 2005. R&D and productivity growth: evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (6), 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafouros, M.I., Buckley, P.J., 2008. Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations? Research Policy 37 (2), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafouros, M.I., Buckley, P.J., Sharp, J.A., Wang, C., 2008. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28 (1–2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., Ahuja, G., 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W., 2002. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92 (1), 120–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24 (2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24, 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurokawa, S., Iwata, S., Roberts, E.B., 2007. Global R&D activities of Japanese MNCs in the US: a triangulation approach. Research Policy 36, 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., Mishra, H.A., 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies 38, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, N., 2010. Geographic distribution of R&D activity: how does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal 53 (5), 1194–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Salter, A., 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen, A., Helfat, C.E., 2010. Innovation opportunities, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2), 224–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J., Hall, B., 1996. Estimating the productivity of research and development in French and US manufacturing firms: an exploration of simultaneity issues with GMM methods. In: Van Ark, B., Wagner, K. (Eds.), International Productivity Differences and their Explanations. Elsevier Science, 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGarvie, M., 2006. Do firms learn from international trade? Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., 1920. Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, A.M., Silverman, B.S., 2006. Profiting from technological innovation by others: the effect of competitor patenting on firm value. Research Policy 35, 1222–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D., 2006. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 27 (7), 601–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D., Fern, M.J., Cardinal, L.B., 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 308–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, A., Schankerman, M., 1984. The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, W.G., 2008. International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy 37 (4), 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner-Hahn, J., Shaver, J.M., 2005. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal 26, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G., 2006. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy 35, 1122–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phene, A., Almeida, P., 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: the role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies 39, 901–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, M.A., Vaizquez, X.H., Garciĭa, J.M., Caballero, G., 2008. Geographical amplitude in the international generation of technology: present situation and business determinants. Research Policy 37, 1371–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., 1974. Science, invention, and economic growth. Economic Journal 84, 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., Almeida, P., 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49, 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, R., Jin, B., 2008. Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting. Journal of International Business Studies 39, 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J., Doz, Y., Williamson, P., 2004. Is your innovation process global? Sloan Management Review 45 (4), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., 1982. Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (4), 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., 2008. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy 37 (1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Li, J., 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Phene, A., 2007. Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organization Science 18 (2), 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.Y., Tikoo, S., 1999. Operational flexibility and market valuation of earnings. Strategic Management Journal 20 (8), 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 15, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., 2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: the effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., Gillespie, J.J., 2002. Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (7), 595–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A., 1996. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal 39 (6), 1713–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A., Ireland, D.R., Hitt, M.A., 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 43 (5), 925–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science 52 (8), 1185–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Maurice Keyworth Building, Leeds, UK

    Mario I. Kafouros, Peter J. Buckley & Jeremy Clegg

Authors
  1. Mario I. Kafouros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter J. Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeremy Clegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2014 Mario I. Kafouros, Peter J. Buckley, and Jeremy Clegg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kafouros, M.I., Buckley, P.J., Clegg, J. (2014). The Effects of Global Knowledge Reservoirs on the Productivity of Multinational Enterprise: The Role of International Depth and Breadth. In: The Multinational Enterprise and the Emergence of the Global Factory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402387_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation