Abstract
The forms of PPPs may change and evolve over time, but the purpose of social innovations in seeking a good way of life and the intention to serve the common good beyond private interests can last long. Then, in Chapter 7, the rice industry case in the post-WTO global competition environment presents how small-scale rice farming and production might find a new form of agricultural collaboration, and later extends its uniqueness by building up a common geographic trademark for a rice brand owned by the local public, and eventually spillover the spirit of social innovations into other local values beyond rice production. This case demonstrates that several PPP forms and partnerships can be adopted from time to time, but always aligning with the purpose of the concurrent goal of common achievements, given the small or big scope of “common” achievements. On the other hand, in the last case in Chapter 8, a rural community case presents the common initiatives to start in an alternative direction, by taking advantage of the PPP with the public-sector program and generating more values beyond it. Eventually, the common good of a sustainable agricultural sixth industrial revolution can achieve a pure good dream of the rural hometown with its own sustainable businesses, regardless of the future availability of the public-sector resources. All the five cases provide demonstrations of how private and public interests can be linked in the short run or can be coevolved over the long run.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. 1998. Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1): 67–92.
Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. 2006. Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2): 211–234.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446–463.
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. 2012a. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41: 726–758.
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. 2012b. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41: 929–968.
Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Üstün, T. B. 1999. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48: 1173–1187.
Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4): 495–502.
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. 2012. Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 1–76.
Chen, T. 2013. http://twstreetcorner.org/2013/10/30/chendungsheng-2/
Chen, D. S. 2012. Communitarian governance and social innovation. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 49: 1–40. (in Chinese)
Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3: 1–14.
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37–57.
Fairweather, G. W., & Davidson, W. S. 1986. An introduction to community experimentation: Theory methods and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyu, M., & Damon, W. 2001. Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York: Basic Books.
Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A. 2000. Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1): 127–144.
Kang, S.-C, Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. 2007. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 236–256.
King, A. 2007. Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 889–900.
Knox, S., & Makain, S. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: Moving beyond investment towards measuring outcomes. European Management Journal, 22(5): 508–516.
Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2012. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3): 332–354.
Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. 2010. (Re)forming strategic cross sector partnerships: Relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49(1): 140–172.
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. 2007. Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 180–194.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603–609.
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1): 1–18.
Murray, K., & Vogel, C. M. 1997. Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2): 141–160.
O’Cass, A., & Ngo, L. V. 2010. Examining the firm’s value creation process: A managerial perspective of the firm’s value offering strategy and performance. British Journal of Management, 22(4): 646–671.
Osborn, R. N., & Marion, R. 2009. Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 191–206.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall: 34–43.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, December: 57–68.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2006. Strategy & society. Harvard Business Review, December: 1–14.
Putrevu, S., McGuire, J., Sieger, D. S., & Smith, D. M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility, irresponsibility, and corruption: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Business Research, 65(11): 1618–1621.
Rethemeyer, R. K. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring collaborative networks. Public Administration Review, 64(6): 62–66.
Rivera-Santos, M., Rufin, C, & Kolk, A. 2012. Bridging the institutional divide: Partnerships in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12): 1721–1727.
Sandel, M. 2009. Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Selsky, J., & Parker, B. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31: 849–873.
Smith, D., Varcoe, C, & Edwards, N. 2005. Turning around the intergenerational impact of residential schools on aboriginal people: Implications for health policy and practice. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 37(4): 38–60.
Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. 2010. The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5): 445–453.
Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11): 1991–2006.
Waddock, S. 1988. Building successful social partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 29(4): 17–23.
Werther, Jr. W. B., & Chandler, D. 2005. Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4): 317–324.
Copyright information
© 2016 I Han and Sheng-Tsung Hou
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Han, I., Hou, ST. (2016). Theoretical Implications. In: Social Innovation and Business in Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403810_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403810_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57266-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40381-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)