Skip to main content

Accessing and Witnessing Prison Practice in Uganda

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

In prison research, gatekeepers are powerful bureaucrats, whose sanctioning makes ethnographic fieldwork within prison walls possible. In the Global South, such sanctioning is more likely than immediately expected as post-colonial prisons are forced open by the proliferation of human rights and as prison managers struggle to ride the tiger of reform towards alliance-building with donors, civil society and international researchers. However, accessing paramilitary state institutions, which testingly reach out to external partners, transcends the initial management of gatekeepers. This chapter briefly introduces the applauded human rights reform process in Uganda and makes a case for the particular kind of knowledge about everyday governance and change that ethnography — especially observations in the field — can offer to gauge prison reform effects. Based on fieldwork experiences from within Ugandan prisons, the chapter explores the register of roles that a researcher may take on to access the people who populate enclosed prison worlds. The management of researcher roles is not simply a question of balancing traction and control of the research process and taking advantage of the researcher’s presence in the field. I suggest that Goffman’s (1989) notion of the fieldworker as a ‘witness’ rather points to the fact that these shifting and contradictory roles propel the researcher into observing and participating in the duplicity intrinsic to prison life and to the ways bureaucracies in the Global South engage with development intervention, custodial imperatives and human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Goffman, E. (1989) ‘On Fieldwork’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 2, 123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M., Jefferson, A. M. and Bandyopadhyay, M. ‘Sensing Prison Climates: Governance, Survival and Transition’, Focaal, 68, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • American Anthropological Association (AAA) (1998) Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association (AAA), http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/ethicscode.pdf (accessed 3 June, 2014).

  • Bandyopadhyay, M. (2010) Everyday Life in a Prison: Confinement, Surveillance, Resistance (New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundgaard, H. (2003) ‘Lærlingen: Den Formative Erfaring’, in K. Hastrup (ed) Ind i Verden. En grundbog i antropologisk metode (Copenhagen: Reitzel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Candea, M. (2009) ‘Arbitrary Locations: In Defence of the Bounded Field-site’, in M.-A. Falzon (ed) Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research (Farnham: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, M. (1989) Warehousing Violence (Newbury Park: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2002) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Questions of Method’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1989) ‘On Fieldwork’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 2, 123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997) ‘Discipline and Practice: “The Field” as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology’, in A. Gupta and J. Ferguson (eds) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, Third edition (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. and Gellner, D. N. (2001) ‘Introduction: Ethnography of Organizations and Organizations of Ethnography’, in D. N. Gellner and E. Hirsch (eds) Inside Organizations: Anthropologists at Work (Oxford: Berg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2011) Even Dead Bodies Must Work: Health, Hard Labor and Abuse in Ugandan Prisons (New York: Human Rights Watch).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Prison Studies (ICPS) (2008) World Prison Brief: Uganda (London: International Centre for Prison Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. B. (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2004) Confronted by Practice: Towards a Critical Psychology of Prison Practice in Nigeria. PhD Dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice Law and Order Sector (JLOS) (2010) Justice Law and Order Sector Midterm Evaluation (Kampala: Republic of Uganda).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (ed) (2006) Humane Prisons (Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, B. (2007) ‘Anthropology and the Dialectic of the Enlightenment: A Discourse on the Definition and Ideals of a Threatened Discipline’, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 18, 72–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (1999) ‘Doing Research in Prison: Breaking the Silence’, Theoretical Criminology, 3, 147–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1992) ‘From Paradigm Lost to Paradigm Regained?’, in N. Long and A. Long (eds) Battlefields of Knowledge. The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. (1995) Purity and Exile. Violence, Memory and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (1995) ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, H. M. (2006) Professional Formation and Survival: Dealing with Contradiction in Ugandan Nursing, PhD Dissertation, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2009) ‘Taking the Snake Out of the Basket: Indian Prison Warders’ Opposition to Human Rights Reform’, in S. Jensen and A. M. Jefferson (eds) State Violence and Human Rights: State Officials in the South (Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2013) Embracing Human Rights: Governance and Transition in Ugandan Prisons, PhD Dissertation, Roskilde University, Roskilde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2014a) ‘The Importation of Human Rights by Ugandan Prison Staff’, Prison Service Journal, 212, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2014b) ‘Reasonable Caning and the Embrace of Human Rights in Ugandan Prisons’, Focaal, 68, 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M., Jefferson, A. and Bandyopadhyay, M. (2014) ‘Sensing Prison Climates: Governance, Survival and Transition’, Focaal, 68, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. and Pels, P. (2005) ‘Introduction: Embedding Ethics’, in L. Meskell and P. Pels (eds) Embedding Ethics (Oxford: Berg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (1973) ‘Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study’, Law and Society Review, 7, 719–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (1994) ‘The Ethnography of the Present and the Analysis of Process’, in R. Borofsky (ed) Assessing Cultural Anthropology (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2008) La riguer du qualitatif. Les contraintes empririques de l’interpretation socio-anthropologique, unpublished translation into English by Antoinette Tidjani Alou ‘Rigorously Qualitative. Epistemology, Fieldwork and Anthropology’ (Louvain-La-Neuve: Academia-Bruylant).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2011a) ‘The Eight Modes of Local Governance in West Africa’, IDS Bulletin, 42, 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2011b) ‘Local Powers and the Co-delivery of Public Goods in Niger’, IDS Bulletin, 42, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, B. J. (2005) ‘From Arrest to Release: The Inside Story of Uganda’s Penal System’, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 16, 117–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, P. (1999) ‘Professions of Duplexity: A Prehistory of Ethical Codes in Anthropology’, Current Anthropology, 40, 101–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2001) ‘Toward an Anthropology of Prisons’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanjek, R. (1990) ‘On Ethnographic Validity’, in R. Sanjek (ed) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • State, U. D. O. (2006) Uganda: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (Uganda: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Independent (2010) A Taste of Hell in Uganda Prisons, 13 April, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.ug/features/features/2769-a-taste-of-hell-in-uganda-prisons (accessed 3 June, 2014).

  • Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza, L. (1995) More Sinned against than Sinning (Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Human Rights Commission(UHRC) (2009) Annual Report2008 (Uganda: UHRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Human Rights Commission(UHRC) (2010) Annual Report2009 (Uganda: UHRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (1998) ‘Anthropology in Prison: Negotiating Consent and Accountability with a “Captured” Population’, Human Organization, 57, 238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (2009) ‘Challenges of Prison Ethnography’, Anthropology News, 50, 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimba, F. and Adure, J. (2010) ‘Prison Staff Accused of Hanging Inmate’, Daily Monitor, 9 March, 2010, http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-/688334/875496/-/wj7g38/ -/index.html (accessed 3 June, 2014).

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Tomas Max Martin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, T.M. (2015). Accessing and Witnessing Prison Practice in Uganda. In: Drake, D.H., Earle, R., Sloan, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403889_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics