Skip to main content

The Function of Decadence and Ascendance in Analytic Philosophy

  • Chapter
Decadence in Literature and Intellectual Debate since 1945
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

In ordinary as well as in technical language, the expression “decadence” is normally used as a topological metaphor. Due to its etymology (from Latin [de]cadere: falling, sinking), the term implies the picture of a space that is at least one-dimensional (vertical), including a fixed top and bottom, whereby “top” normally stands for a desirable status or an ideal (positive connotation) and “bottom” for the opposite (negative connotation).1 In terms of this picture, a “decadent” can be defined as someone/something that falls or sinks top-down from this desirable status or ideal to the opposite. In turn, a vertical space with a fixed top and bottom reveals not only a top-down movement that can be defined as “decadence” but also a bottom-up movement for which metaphors such as “ascendance,” “rise,” or “jump up” can be used.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ayer, Alfred Jules. Language, Truth and Logic. Eighteenth impression. London: Victor Gollancz, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. London and Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. London, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, Robert B. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. London, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, Karl. “Portrait of a Philosopher.” K. T. Fann (ed.): Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Man and His Philosophy. New York: Dell, 1967, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David J. Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, M. O’C. “Conversations with Wittgenstein,” Rush Rhees (ed): Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, 97–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, Hans-Johann. “Does Ontology Exist?” Philosophy 77, 2002, 235–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Wittgenstein and History.” A. Pichler, S. Säätelä (ed.): Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Frankfurt/Main: ontos, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, John. The Universe as We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Third Edition. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemanski Jens. “Die neuaristotelischen Ursprünge des Kontextprinzips und die Fortführung in der fregeschen Begriffsschrift ” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 67:4, 2013, 566–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Neil. “Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences.” Metaphilosophy 34:3, 2003, 284–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclntyre, Alasdair. “Hume on‘Is’ and‘Ought.’” Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. New York: Schocken, 1971, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan, 1966.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, James Edwin. “Maclntyre and the Emotivists.” Fran O’ Rourke (ed.): What Happened in and to Moral Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Alasdair Maclntyre. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame Press, 2013, 167–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. London, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Mind and World: With a New Introduction. London, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B. P./Robinson, M. D. “Why the Sunny Side Is Up.” Psychological Science 15, 2004, 243–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Brian P./Hauser, David J./Robinson, Michael D./Kelland, Chris/Schjeldahl, Katie. “What’s ‘Up’ with God?: Vertical Space as a Representation of the Divine.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93:5, 2007, 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Ray. Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Cape, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres.” Truth and Progress. London, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998, 247–274.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Introduction: Antirepresentationalism, Ethnocentrism and Liberalism.” Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers. Repr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991a, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Solidarity or Objectivity.” Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Repr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991a, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satris, Stephen. Ethical Emotivism. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijohoff, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and Philosophy of Mind.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science I, 1956, 253–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Sensibility and Understanding.” Science and Metaphysics: Variation on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, Theodore R. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Univ. Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, Hans. “What Has History to Do with Me?: Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy.” Inquiry 41, 1998, 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, Tom. “Introduction.” Tom Sorell/G. A. J. Rogers (ed.): Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005a, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “On Saying No to History of Philosophy.” Tom Sorell/G. A. J. Rogers (ed.): Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005b, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. “On Hating and Despising Philosophy.” London Review of Books, April 18, 1996, 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks 1914–1916. Second Edition. Ed. by G. H. v. Wright, G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Diemo Landgraf

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lemanski, J., Alogas, K. (2014). The Function of Decadence and Ascendance in Analytic Philosophy. In: Decadence in Literature and Intellectual Debate since 1945. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431028_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics