Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of History in Information Systems Research: Beyond Presentism

  • Chapter
Materiality and Time

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

  • 191 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to stimulate the contribution that historical awareness may add to the field of information systems (IS) research. Despite the offerings from the study of history, the IS community has not developed a strong tradition of historical research (Land, 2010; Mitev & de Vaujany, 2012; see also a special issue on history in IS research, Bryant et al., 2013). Arguably, the adoption of historical sensitivity and awareness is especially pertinent in a field that is often driven by the “awesome potential” of advanced information and communication technologies. All too frequently, we lose sight of some of the difficulties that are being posed as we are seduced by new technology, and the field of IS especially can suffer from presentism (see Hartog’s chapter in this book). The acquisition of a historical consciousness may enable the evaluation of these changes within their historical context and origins. Quite often superficial changes are focused upon by the management consultancy “change industry”, and so concepts and themes are often repackaged several years later (Westrup, 2005), with little awareness as to how these recent trends compare with similar developments in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, M. T., & Hecht, G. (2001). Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, A. M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C., Siemer, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (1999). The academic field of information systems in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, F. (2002). The dimension of time: historiography in information systems research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 1(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banville, C., & Landry, M. (1989). Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernroider, E. W., Pilkington, A., & Córdoba, J. (2013). Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). Management and organizational history: prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C. (1998). Modest reviewer goes on virtual voyage: some recent literature of cyberspace. Technology and Culture, 39, 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, H.-J. (2000). Current research in the history of technology in Europe. In G. Hollister-Short (ed.) History of Technology, London: Continuum, Volume 21, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge, O. (2009). Using history in organizations: how managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., Black, A., Land, F., & Porra, J. (2013). Information systems history: what is history? what is IS history? what IS history?…and why even bother with history? Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (1998). Data processing and technological change: the post office savings bank, 1861–1930. Technology and Culture, 39(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (2003). From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M. (2010). Historical reflections: victorian data processing. Communications of the ACM, 53(10), 19–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M., & Asprey, W. (1996). Computer: A History of the Information Machine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, M., & Garcia-Swartz, D. (2013). The history of the internet: the missing narratives. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswill, C., & Wensley, R. (2007). Doors and boundaries: a recent history of the relationship between research and practice in UK organizational and management research. Business History, 49(3), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1961). What is History? Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: towards an “historic turn”? Business History, 46(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. (1999). Writing the left out of management theory: the historiography of the management of change. Organization, 6(1), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, J. W. (1996). Information Technology as Business History: Issues in History and Management of Computers. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, J. W. (2004). The Digital Hand: How Computers Changed the Work of American Manufacturing, Transportation and Retail Industries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M., & Swanson, E. (1986). Research in management information systems 1980–1984: points of work and reference. MIS Quarterly, Sept., 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahaye, A., Booth, C., Clark, P., Procter, S., & Rowlinson, M. (2009). The genre of corporate history. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vaujany, F-X. (2006). Conceptualizing IS archetypes through history: the case of the Roman Curia. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Dec.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaujany, F., Walsh, I., & Mitev, N. (2011). A historically grounded critical analysis of research articles in IS. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Actor-network theory: ANTi-history and critical organizational historiography. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Montreal, 6–10 August 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbanna, A. R. (2002). Information technology and organisational transformation: history, rhetoric and practice. Information Technology & People, 15(2), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. E. (1996). Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, B. (2013). Outsiders: an exploratory history of IS in corporations. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6), 622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillenson, M., & Stutz, J. (1991). Academic issues in MIS: journals and books. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 147–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. J. (2005). How should we do the history of organization theory? Organization, 12(6), 925–927 (Book Review: Reflections on the “State” of Organizational Theory).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (1997). TQM, BPR, JIT, BSCs and TLAs: managerial waves or drownings? Management Decision, 35(10), 731–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, T. (2001). Inventing information systems: the systems men and the computer, 1950–1968. Business History Review, 75(1), 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 7(4), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardgrave, B., & Walstrom, K. (1997). Forums for MIS scholars. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartt, C. M., Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2009). Performing the past: ANTi-history, gendered spaces and feminist practice, 26th European Group on Organisation Studies (EGOS) Colloquium (Lisbon, June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, G., & Allen, M. T. (2001). Authority, political machines and technology’s history. In M. T. Allen, & G. Hecht (eds) Technologies of Power, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L. J., & Riedl, R. (2013). Understanding the dominance and advocacy of the design-oriented research approach in the business informatics community: a history-based examination. Journal of Information Technology, 28(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. A. (1985). Information systems epistemology: an historical perspective. In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, & G. Fitzgerald (eds) Research Methods in Information Systems, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2000). Information systems research at the crossroads: external versus internal views. In R. Baskerville, J. Stage, & J. DeGross (eds) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 233–254.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C., Johnson, L., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. (1994). Business computing research journals: a normalized citation analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howcroft, D. A., Mitev, N. N., & Wilson, M. (2004). What we may learn from the social shaping of technology approach. In L. Willcocks, & J. Mingers (eds) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, Chichester: John Wiley (Information Systems Series), 329–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, Ma.: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingelstam, L. (1996). Complex Technical Systems. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. (1996). Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Centuries. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. G. W. (1991). Relevance and rigor in information systems research. In H.-E. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (eds) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses — and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5(4), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1997). Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization, 4(1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, F. (2010). The use of history in IS research: an opportunity missed? Journal of Information Technology, 25(4), 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. (1984). Historical perspective: using the past to study the present. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science, social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (1996). How do we know the properties of artefacts? Applying the sociology of knowledge to technology. In Robert Fox (ed.) Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology, London: Harwood, pp. 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. (eds) (1985). The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L-P. (2009). The nature of the changing role of first-tier managers: a long-cycle approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(1), 92–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. O., McKenney, J. L., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Developing an historical tradition in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 257–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, J. L., Mason, R., & Copeland, D.G. (1997). Bank of America: the crest and trough of technological leadership. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 321–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitev, N., & de Vaujany, F-X. (2012). Seizing the opportunity: towards a historiography of information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitev, N. and D. Howcroft (2011) Poststructuralism, Science and Technology Studies and Actor Network Theory: what can they bring to IS research? in R. Galliers & W. Currie (eds) Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 329–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (2002). Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylonopoulos, N., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). On-site: global perceptions of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J., Remenyi, D., & Keaney, A. (2004). Historiography — a neglected research method in business and management studies. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(2), 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshri, I., & Van Uhm, B. (2012). A historical review of the information technology and business process captive centre sector. Journal of Information Technology, 27(4), 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (2013). Living in the material world. In F.-X. de Vaujany, & N. Mitev (eds) Materiality and Space: Organisations, Artefacts and Practices, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2005). The History of Texaco’s corporate information technology function: a general systems theoretical interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 721–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porra, J., Hirschheim, R., & Parks, M. S. (2006). Forty years of the corporate information technology function at Texaco Inc. — a history. Information and Organization, 16, 82–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlinson, M., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., Booth, C., & Procter, S. (2008). The uses of History as corporate knowledge. In H. Scarbrough (ed.) The Evolution of Business Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaton, A., & Abbate, J. (2001). The hidden lives of standards: technical prescriptions and the transformation of work in America. Technologies of Power, 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, F., & Mingers, J. (1997). Introduction. In J. Mingers, & F. Stowell (eds) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usdiken, B., & Kieser, A. (2004). Introduction: history in organisation studies. Business History, 46(3), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. (2000). Certificates and computers: the remaking of Wall Street 1967–1971. Business History Review, 72, 193–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrup, C. (2005). Management fashions and information systems. In D. Howcroft, & E. M. Trauth (eds) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, M., Hendrickson, A., & Townsend, A. (1999). Research commentary. Academic rewards for teaching, research and service: data and discourse. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S., & Taylor, L. (2001). The Role of information technology in the transformation of work: a comparison of post-industrial, industrial and proto-industrial organization. In J. Yates, & J. Van Maanen (eds) Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric and Practice, London: Sage, 7–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (2005). Structuring the Information Age: Life Insurance and Technology in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N. (2002). Spinning disciplines: critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education. Organization, 9(3), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zan, L. (2004). Accounting and management discourse in protoindustrial settings: the Venice Arsenal in the turn of the XVI Century. Accounting and Business Research, 32, 145–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Nathalie Mitev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris-Dauphine, France

    Francois-Xavier de Vaujany  & Pierre Laniray  & 

  2. London School of Economics, UK

    Nathalie Mitev

  3. McGill University, Canada

    Emmanuelle Vaast

Copyright information

© 2014 Nathalie Mitev

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitev, N. (2014). The Role of History in Information Systems Research: Beyond Presentism. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., Vaast, E. (eds) Materiality and Time. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation