Skip to main content

Relational Works-in-Movement Using the Body Response System

  • Chapter
The Performing Subject in the Space of Technology

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology ((PSPT))

Abstract

Audience members are camped on the floor. Pressure-sensing mats and a backprojected screen delineate a performance space. Cameras trained on this space include a live-projected feed, as well as a number of smaller motion-sensing cameras. The performer first appears as silhouette. Notes sound as she moves. As she emerges into the space, her steps launch further notes while her gestures trigger flurries of other pitches. Video-effects shimmer, delay or multiply her projected image when she moves. Sometimes engrossed in inner movementdialogue, at other times she turns attention to the audience, mirroring their postures, dissolving the distance between them. Later, by playfully jogging around or gently nudging audience members, she wordlessly encourages their participation. Finding some willing collaborators, a number of ad hoc movement-duets unfold. One spectator initiates a duet himself. Performance over, the audience are encouraged to investigate the space themselves. The invitation is enthusiastically accepted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beardsley, M. and Wimsatt, W. (1954) ‘The Intentional Fallacy’, in W. Wimsatt (ed.), The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belet, B. (2003) ‘Live Performance Interaction for Humans and Machines in the Early Twenty-first Century: One Composer’s Aesthetics for Composition and Performance Practice’, Organised Sound: an International Journal of Music Technology, 8:3, p. 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berleant, A. (1994) ‘The Persistence of Dogma in Aesthetics’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52:2, pp. 237–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. (2002) Relational Aesthetics, trans. S. Pleasance, F. Woods and M. Copeland. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, P. (1984) Theory of the Avant-Garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. (2007) ‘Reappraising the Disappearing Body and the Disembodied Eye through Multisensory Art’, Crossings ejournal of Art and Technology, 5:1, http://crossings.tcd.ie/issues/5.1/Coleman/ [accessed 1 April 2010].

  • Coulter-Smith, G. (2006) Deconstructing Installation Art, Casiad Publishing, www.installationart.net/Chapter3Interaction/interaction03.html [accessed 1 February 2012].

  • Croce, B. (2004) Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic. Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1979) ‘Poetics of the Open Work’, in U. Eco (ed.), The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1989) Art Alienated: An Essay on the Decline of Participatory-Art, http://cafeirreal.alicewhittenburg.com/art_alie.pdf [accessed 20 June 2012].

  • Foucault, M. (1977) ‘What is an Author?’, in D.F. Bouchard (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. and George, L. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, M.W (1990) ‘VIDEOPLACE and the Interface of the Future’, in B. Laurel (ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmanovitch, S. (1990) Free Play Improvisation in Life and Art. New York: Penguin/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciére, J. (2009) The Emancipated Spectator. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2005) ‘The Silent, Limping Body of Philosophy’, in T. Carman and M. Hansen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Maria Coleman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, M. (2015). Relational Works-in-Movement Using the Body Response System. In: Causey, M., Meehan, E., O’Dwyer, N. (eds) The Performing Subject in the Space of Technology. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438164_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics