Abstract
This chapter examines the digital, interactive dance performance Apparition (2004) by media artist Klaus Obermaier, in order to open up a discussion of Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology. The discourse introduces Stiegler’s key concepts of individuation, organology and the Pharmakon so that the significance of Obermaier’s creative endeavours can be reconsidered ten years after its initial unveiling. Crucially we shall see how, understood within Stiegler’s mobilisation of the concept of the avant-garde, Apparition, which uses bespoke, cutting-edge technology, offers provocative audiovisual metaphors that give rise to questions relating to ontology and tool-use. It will be argued that manifest in the oeuvre is an appeal for a reconsideration of digital technologies as interdependent, artificial organs in an overall evolutionary process that fundamentally challenges means-ends rationale. Viewed through a Stieglerian philosophical lens, a discussion of Obermaier’s work inevitably opens out into a radical critique of inter subjectivity in the digital epoch.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, T.W. (2002) Aesthetic Theory. London and New York: Continuum.
Adorno, T.W. and Horkheimer, M. (1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
Biro, M. (2009) The Dada Cyborg: Visions of the New Human in Weimar Berlin. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bullivant, L. (2006) Responsive Environments: Architecture, Art and Design. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
deLahunta, S. (2005a) Klaus Obermaier:: Apparition — Project, www.exile.at/ apparition/project.html [accessed 22 January 2012].
deLahunta, S. (2005b) Klaus Obermaier:: Apparition — Background, www.exile.at/apparition/ background.html [accessed 22 January 2012].
Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59 (Winter), pp. 3–7.
Deleuze, G. (2005) Cinema II. London and New York: A & C Black (Continuum).
Desmond, C., Doyle, J., Matthews, E., O’Canoll, C, O’Dwyer, N., O’Hara, M. and Vaughan, C. (forthcoming 2015) Tn Response to Bernard Stiegler: A Pharmacological Avant-Garde’, in N. Fitzpatrick and T Stott (eds), Inprint 3.
Habermas, J. (1989) Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon (Polity) Press.
Hayles, N. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Hörtner, H. (2014) Ars Electronica \ FutureLab, Ars Electron. Futur., www.aec.at/ futurelab/en/aktuelles/about/ [accessed 15 February 2014].
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Obermaier, K. (1999) Artist’s Statement: D.a.v.e. — Digital Amplified Video Engine, Exile.at, www.exile.at/dave/project.html [accessed 25 October 2012].
Ross, D. (2009) ‘Politics and Aesthetics, Or, Transformations of Aristotle in Bernard Stiegler’, Transformations Journal, 17, University of Queensland.
Sinnerbrink, R. (2009) ‘Culture Industry Redux: Stiegler and Denida on Technics and Cultural Polities’, Transformations Journal, 17, University of Queensland.
Stiegler, B. (1998) Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus, trans. R. Beardsworth and G. Collins. Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2007) ‘Anamnesis and Hypomnesis: Plato as the First Thinker of the Proletarianisation’, Ars Industrialis, http://arsindustrialis.org/anamnesis-and-hypomnesis [accessed 20 May 2014].
Stiegler, B. (2008) Technics and Time, 2: Disorientation, trans. S. Barker. Stanford University Press.
Stiegler, B. (2010) ‘The Age of De-proletarianisation: Art and Teaching Art in Post-Cons um er ist Culture’, in K. Corcoran and C. Delfos (eds), Art Futures: durent Issues in Higher Arts Education (Amsterdam: ELIA, European League of Institutes of the Arts), pp. 10–19.
Stiegler, B. (2011) ‘Suffocated Desire, or How the Cultural Industry Destroys the Individual: Contribution to a Theory of Mass Consumption’, Parrhesia: A journal of Critical Philosophy, 13, pp. 52–61.
Stiegler, B. (2013) ‘Le séminaire Pharmakon.fr, Ecole de philosophie d’Epineuil-le-Fleuriel’ [The Pharmakon Seminar, Philosophical School of Epineuil-le-Fleuriel], Pharmakon.fr, http://pharmakon.fr/wordpress/le-seminaire/ [accessed 18 May 2014].
Stiegler, B. (2014a) Symbolic Misery: The Hyperindustrial Epoch. Oxford: Polity Press.
Stiegler, B. (2014b) ‘Misère symbolique Ars Industrialis’, International Association for an Industrial Politic of Technologies of the Spirit, Ars Industrialis, trans. N. O’Dwyer, http://arsindustrialis.org/mis%C3%A8re-symbolique [accessed 19 May 2014].
Stiegler, B. (forthcoming 2015) ‘Interview with Bernard Stiegler’, in N. Fitzpatrick and T Stott (eds), Inprint 3.
Stiegler, B., Roberts, B., Gilbert, J. and Hayward, M. (2012) ‘Bernard Stiegler: “A Rational Theory of Miracles: On Pharmacology and Transindividuation”’, New Formations, 77, pp. 164–84.
Vaccari, A. and Barnet, B. (2009) ‘Bernard Stiegler and the Question of Technics’, Transformations journal, 17, University of Queensland.
Zuidervaart, L. (2011) ‘Theodor W. Adomo’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2011/entries/adorno/ [accessed 20 May 2014].
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Néill O’Dwyer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Dwyer, N. (2015). The Cultural Critique of Bernard Stiegler: Reflecting on the Computational Performances of Klaus Obermaier. In: Causey, M., Meehan, E., O’Dwyer, N. (eds) The Performing Subject in the Space of Technology. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438164_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137438164_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68364-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43816-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)