Skip to main content

Abstract

Through long stretches of its history, Austria’s administration was deeply embedded in an imperial-royal tradition which is an essential element of the sociocultural and administrative landscape even today. In the eighteenth century, it was the concern for the welfare of her subjects that motivated Empress Maria Theresa to form a centrally administered bureaucratic state from the former feudal construct. With this imperial reform, not only did the state take on the responsibility for the welfare of its citizens, but the role of “servants of the public” was created. An administrative system, the rule of law. and the civil service became the guarantors of the welfare state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biegelbauer, P., and Grießler, E. (2009). “Politische Praktiken von MinisterialbeamtInnen im österreichischen Gesetz.ebungsprozess.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ÖZP) 38(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blöndal, J. R., and Bergvall, D. (2007). “Budgeting in Austria.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 7, 1–37. http://www.oecd.org/austria/seniorbudgetofficialcountryreviewsofbudgetingsystems. htm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMF (2011). Ausgliederungen und Beteiligungen des Bundes. Bericht gemäß § 35a BHG (Oktober 2011). Bundesministerium für Finanzen. https://www.bmf.gv.at/budget/das-budget/Ausgliederungsbericht_2012.pdf?3vtkfo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeskanzleramt (2011). “Administration in Austria.” Federal Ministry for Women and Public Service in the Federal Chancellery Austria, Vienna. http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=42553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeskanzleramt (2012a). “The Austrian Federal Civil Service Facts and Figures 2011.” The Federal Chancellery, Vienna. http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView. axd?CobId=49012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeskanzleramt (2012b). Das Personal des Bundes 2012. Daten und Fakten. Bundeskanzleramt, Bundesministerin für Frauen und Öffentlichen Dienst, Vienna. http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=48965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmke, C., Hammerschmid, G., and Meyer, R. E. (2006). “Decentralisation and Accountability as a Focus of Public Administration Modernisation: Challenges and Consequences for Human Resource Management.” EIPA, European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht/Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., and Tinkler, J. (2006). “New Public Management Is Dead: Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” In Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16(3), 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger-Peitler, I., and Polzer, T. (forthcoming). “Open Data: European Ambitions and Local Efforts. Experiences from Austria.” In Gasco, Mila, ed., Open Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010). “Digitizing Public Services in Europe: Putting Ambition into Action.” 9th Benchmark Measurement (prepared by Capgemini, IDC, Rand Europe, Sogeti and DTi). European Commission, Directorate General for Information Society and Media, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/egov-report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, W. (2012). “Die Organisation eines Systems ist die Organisation der Unterschiede.” Zur Ausgestaltung der Nahtstellen zwischen Politik und Bundesverwaltung in Österreich (Studie). http://members.aon.at/wolfganggratz/Nahtstelleno/o20Politik%20Verwaltung%20 Gratz%20Langfassung.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., Krischok, A., and Steigenberger, K. (2012). “Austria.” In Verhoest, Koen, Van Thiel, Sandra, Bouckaert, Geert, and Lægreid, Per, eds., Government Agencies. Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., and Meyer, R. E. (2005a). “Public Management Reform and Staff Participation and Involvement. The Austrian Experiences.” In Hondeghem, Annie, Farnham, David, and Horton, Sylvia, eds., Public Management Reform and Staff Participation and Involvement in the Public Services: International Comparisons. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., and Meyer, R. E. (2005b). “New Public Management in Austria: Local Variation on a Global Theme? In Public Administration 83(3), 709–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, Gerhard, and Meyer, Renate E. (2005c). “Public Management Dynamics in a Federal Legalistic Rechtsstaat System: Results from an Executive Survey in Austria.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 18 (6/7), 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock, G., Klimmer, M., Leitl-Staudinger, B., Meyer, R. E., Pfeil, W., and Sladecek, E. (2011). “Perspektiven des öffentlichen Dienstes. 7 Thesen—50 Empfehlungen.” Beiratsbericht im Auftrag der Bundesministerin für Frauen und öffentlichen Dienst (BKA), Vienna. http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?Cobld=44129.

  • Holzinger, G., Oberndorfer, P., and Raschauer, B. (2006). Österreichische Verwaltungslehre. Vienna: Verlag Österreich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., and Seiwald, J. (2013). “The Translation and Sedimentation of Accounting Reforms: A Comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian Experiences.” In Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25(4–5), 388–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Knassmüller, M., and Meyer, R. E. (2013). “What Kind of Reflection Do We Need in Public Management? Teaching Public Administration 31(1), 81–95. doi:10.117 7/01447394134 79199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelo, J., and Müller, W. C. (2010). “From the Europeanization of Lawmaking to the Europeanization of National Legal Orders: The Case of Austria.” Public Administration 88 (1), 36–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9299.2010.01815.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., and Hammerschmid, G. (2013). “Of Bureaucrats and Passionate Managers; Institutional Logics, Executive Identities, and Public Service Motivation.” Public Administration. doi:10.1111 /j.1467–9299.2012.02105.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., and Hammerschmid, G. (2006a). “Changing Institutional Logics and Executive Identities: A Managerial Challenge to Public Administration in Austria.” American Behavioral Scientist 49(7), 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., and Hammerschmid, G. (2006b). “Public management reform: An identity project.” Public Policy and Administration 21(1), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, F. (1996). “New Frontiers in Public Sector Management: Trends and Issues in State and Local Government in Europe.” Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). “Government at a Glance 2011—Country Note: AUSTRIA.” June 24, 2011. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/62/47875865.pdf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). “Human Resources Management Country Profiles: Austria.” http://www.oecd.org/gov/pem/OECD%2OHRM%20Profile%20-%20Austria.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (1999). “Grasping the Nettle: Possibilities and Pitfalls of a Critical Management Pedagogy.” British Journal of Management 10(2), 171–184. doi/1467–8551.00118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, A., and Weissleder, M. (2009). “Management Development in der öffentlichen Verwaltung.” In Thom, Norbert, and Zaugg, Robert J., eds., Moderne Personalentwicklung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 371–394. doi,10.1007/978–3-8349–8097-7_22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seiwald, J., Meyer, R. E., Hammerschmid, G., Egger-Peitler, I., and Höllerer, M. (2013). Neue Wege des Haushaltsmanagements, Internationale Erfahrungen, Herausforderungen und Trends. Berlin: edition sigma. Tálos, Emmerich (2008), Sozialpartnerschaft. Ein zentraler politischer Gestaltungsfaktor in der Zweiten Republik. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, N., and Ritz, A. (2008). Public Management: Innovative Konzepte zur Führung im öffentlichen Sektor. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Isabell Egger-Peitler, Monika Knassmüller, and Renate Meyer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Egger-Peitler, I., Knassmüller, M., Meyer, R. (2015). Austria. In: Van Wart, M., Hondeghem, A., Schwella, E., Suino, P. (eds) Leadership and Culture. Governance and Public Management Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137454133_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics