Abstract
This chapter discusses the theory surrounding the semiotic resource of ‘camera angles’ and examines the consequences of bringing theoretical categories into contact with a diverse body of actually broadcast images. I start with an outline of the accepted — if we understand repeated appearance in academic work as a mark of acceptance — theoretical understandings of camera angles. Real-world camera positioning can be descriptively complex, and it is conventional to see camera angles as resolvable along two perpendicular axes, the horizontal and vertical planes dealt with in this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BBC Academy (2014), Writing to Pictures available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/journalism/article/art20130702112133570, accessed 12 Nov. 2014 (permanent link: http://perma.cc/A6RD-TKND).
Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K. (1993), Film Art: An Introduction (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Eco, U. (1980 [1965]), ‘Towards a semiotic inquiry into the television message’, in Corner, J. and Hawthorn, J. (eds.), Communication Studies: An Introductory Reader. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 103–121.
Fiske, J. and Hartley, J. (1978), Reading Television. London: Methuen.
Freeman, L. A. (2000), Closing the Shop: Information Cartels and Japan’s Mass Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gans, H. J. (1980), Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, ‘Newsweek’ and ‘Time’. New York: Vintage.
Grimes, T. (1991), ‘Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity’, Human Communication Research, 18(2): 268–298.
Hall, S. (2000 [1980]), ‘Encoding/decoding’, in P. Marris and S. Thornham (eds.), Media Studies: A Reader (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hodge, B. and Kress, G. R. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.
Koga-Browes, S. P. (2013). ‘Social distance portrayed: Television news in Japan and the UK’, Visual Communication, 12(1): 71–96.
Kress, G. R. and Leeuwen, T. van. (2006), Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Messaris, P. (1998), ‘Visual aspects of media literacy’, Journal of Communication, 48(1, Winter): 70–80.
Metallinos, N. (1996), Television Aesthetics: Perceptual, Cognitive, and Compositional Bases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Millerson, G. (2001), Video Production Handbook (3rd ed.). Oxford: Focal Press.
Tuchman, G. (1973), ‘The technology of objectivity: Doing “objective” TV news film’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2(3): 3–25.
UK Parliament Administration Committee (2012), Television: Rules of coverage, available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmadmin/14/1403.htm#a5, accessed 19 Nov. 2014 (permanent link: http:// perma.cc/7HE8-HWEX).
Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P., Alpers, G. W. and Mühlberger, A. (2008), ‘Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety? An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study’, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(1): 93–103.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Scott Koga-Browes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koga-Browes, S. (2015). Camera Angles in Television News. In: Piazza, R., Haarman, L., Caborn, A. (eds) Values and Choices in Television Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478474_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478474_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58003-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47847-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)