Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Nottingham China Policy Institute Series ((NCP))

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

According to China’s recent policy paper on the European Union, the ‘China-EU Comprehensive Partnership [is at a crucial stage as] it enters its second decade. … With no fundamental conflict of interests, China and the EU have far more agreement than differences [and] face new historic opportunities.’3 The Chinese government’s renewed emphasis on collaboration implies both opportunities and challenges for civil society dialogue and cooperation between the EU and China. These opportunities and challenges have to be understood in the context of fast moving developments within China and the EU. China is in a phase of complex reforms and transition towards a market-driven, innovative, knowledge-based, more inclusive, more just and more sustainable economy and society. For this transition towards a model of more sustainable development, China needs and frequently asks for the support of the EU and its member states.

The EU should … launch a political review of EU—China policy that would look at the way both member states and the EU institutions approach China. It should examine the effectiveness of sectorial and strategic dialogues so that the process can be streamlined and preferably run at the level of the EU institutions. … The EEAS will also need to involve European businesses and NGOs in order to gain political legitimacy and influence.

François Godement, European Council on Foreign Relations1

The greater flexibility of non-governmental organizations in using networks has given rise to what some call ‘the new public diplomacy’, which is about building relationships with civil society actors in other countries and about facilitating networks between non-governmental parties at home and abroad.

Joseph S. Nye Jr, Harvard Kennedy School of Government2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. David Dolowitz and Dale Medearis (2009) ‘Considerations of the Obstacles and Opportunities to Formalizing Cross-National Policy Transfer to the United States: A Case Study of the Transfer of Urban Environmental and Planning Policies from Germany’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 684–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Hockenos (2014) ‘Germany Taps Universities in its Push for Green Energy’, New York Times, 11 May, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/12/world/europe/germany-taps-universities-in-its-push-for-green-energy.html (accessed 27 May 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stephan Keukeleire and Tom Delreux (2014) The Foreign Policy of the European Union (New York: Palgrave Macmillan) 2nd edition, p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhongqi Pan (ed.) (2012) Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott Barrett (2011) Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deng Guosheng (2013) ‘The Decline of Foreign Aid and the Dilemma of the Chinese Grassroots NGOs’, Religions & Christianity in Today’s China, vol. 3, no. 1; and Yu Fangqiang (2013) ‘Now More Important than Ever: International NGOs Should Increase, Not Reduce, their Support for Chinese Civil Society Organizations’, http://www.eu-china.net/web/cms/upload/pdf/materialien/201 3_06-Fangqiang_Support-for-Chinese-NGOs.pdf (accessed 26 November 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nora Sausmikat (2010) ‘China Viewed from the European Civil Society Perspective’, in Nora Sausmikat and Klaus Fritsche (eds) Civil Society in European-Chinese Relations: Challenges of Cooperation (Essen: EU-China Civil Society Forum), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dale Medearis and David Dolowitz (2013) ‘Cross-national Urban Sustainability Learning’, in Harald Mieg and Klaus Töpfer (eds) Institutional and Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Development (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moritz C. Remig and Irene Wiese-Von Ofen (2013) ‘The Institutionalization of Interfaces as a Prerequisite in Transformations towards Sustainability’, in Mieg and Töpfer, Institutional and Social Innovation, pp. 356–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Andreas Fulda and Horst Fabian

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fulda, A., Fabian, H. (2015). Reinvigorating the EU-China Strategic Partnership. In: Fulda, A. (eds) Civil Society Contributions to Policy Innovation in the PR China. The Nottingham China Policy Institute Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137518644_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics