Abstract
This chapter is concerned with the disruptive potential of memory in peacebuilding processes where and when they materialize in the built environment. There is a diverse literature on how museums, memorials and sculpture are used to signify, electively narrate or even erase history and condensed forms of heritage (Schramm 2011). However, there is comparatively less work on how such processes confront mainstream policy communities concerned with place-making in uncertain and vulnerable post-conflict conditions. This analysis aims to evaluate the confrontation between public policy (in planning, urban management and development) with places that are loaded with meaning and memory for ethnic groups determined to legitimate their past as well as their future claims. It sets the context by conceptualizing the technical routines of planning and its concern with mediating interests, communicative action and collaborative practice, with the need to understand how space is socially constructed and, in particular, how memorialization elevates place from the mundane to the sacred.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allmendinger P (2009) Planning Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson B (1983) Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
Belfast Telegraph (2013) Design Row over Daniel Libeskind’s Maze Peace-Building Centre in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Belfast Telegraph, 10 May.
Belfast Telegraph (2013) Maze U-Turn: Peter Robinson’s Letter in Full to Senior Party Figures. Belfast: Belfast Telegraph, 15 August.
Booher DE and Innes JE (2002) Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3): 221–236.
Coiste na n-larchimi (2003) A Museum at Long Kesh or the Maze? Belfast: Coiste na n-larchimi.
Deyle RE and Wiedenman RE (2014) Collaborative Planning by Metropolitan Planning Organizations: A Text of Casual Theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 34(3): 257–275.
Dwyer OJ (2000) Interpreting the Civil Rights Movement: Place, Memory, and Conflict. The Professional Geographer 52(4): 660–671.
Eschebach I (2011) Soil, Ashes, Commemoration: Processes of Sacralization at the Former Ravensbrück Concentration Camp. History and Memory 23(1): 131–156.
Flynn MK (2011) Decision-Making and Contested Heritage in Northern Ireland: The Former Maze Prison/Long Kesh. Irish Political Studies 26(3): 383–401.
Flyvbjerg B (2004) Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. Planning Theory and Practice 5(3): 283–306.
Graham B and Howard P (2008) Introduction: Heritage and Identity. In Graham B and Howard P (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1–18.
Graham B and McDowell S (2007) Meaning in the Maze: The Heritage of Long Kesh. Cultural Geographies 14(3): 343–368.
Greenspan E (2005) A Global Site of Heritage? Constructing Spaces of Memory at the World Trade Center Site. International Journal of Heritage Studies 11(5): 371–384.
Gunder M (2010) Planning as the Ideology of (Neoliberal) Space. Planning Theory 9(4): 298–314.
Healey P (1996) Consensus-building across Difficult Divisions: New Approaches to Collaborative Strategy Making. Planning Practice and Research 11(2): 207–216.
Healey P (2010) Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hillier J (2002) Direct Action and Agonism in Democratic Planning Practice. In: Allmendinger P and Tewdwr-Jones M (eds) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 110–135.
Innes JE and Booher DE (2010) Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lowenthal D (1979) Age and Artelact: Dilemmas of Appreciation. In: Meinig D (ed.) The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–128.
MLKDC (2013) From Peace to Prosperity Vision and Development Plan. Bellast: MLKDC.
Milner HR (2007) Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality: Working through Dangers Seen, Unseen and Unforeseen. Educational Researcher 36(7): 388–400.
Moshenska G (2009) Resonant Materiality and Violent Remembering: Archaeology, Memory and Bombing. International Journal of Heritage Studies 15(1): 44–56.
Murtagh B and Ellis G (2011) Skills, Conflict and Spatial Planning in Northern Ireland. Planning Theory and Practice 12(3): 349–365.
Neill WJV (2006) Return to Titanic and Lost in the Maze: The Search for Representation of ‘Post-conflict’ Bellast. Space and Polity 10(2): 109–120.
Pløger J (2004) Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism. Planning Theory 3(1): 71–92.
Ponzini D and Nastasi M (2011) Starchitecture Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities. Turin: Umberto Allemandi.
Richmond OP (2011) Critical Agency, Resistance and a Post-colonial Civil Society. Cooperation and Conflict 46(4): 419–440.
Richmond O and Mitchell A (2012) Introduction. In: Richmond O and Mitchell A (eds) Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–38.
Saunders N (2001) Matter and Memory in the Landscapes of Conflict: The Western Front 1914–1919. In: Bender B and Winer M (eds) Contested Landscapes: Movement, Exile and Place. Oxford: Berg, pp. 37–53.
Schramm K (2011) Introduction: Landscapes of Violence: Memory and Sacred Space. Heritage and Memory 23(1): 5–22.
Sturken M (2004) The Aesthetics of Absence: Rebuilding Ground Zero. American Ethnologist 31(3): 311–325.
The Newsletter (2012) 20 July, Maze Shrine Now a Step Closer. Bellast: The Newsletter.
Till KE (2012) Wounded Cities: Memory-Work and a Place-Based Ethics of Care. Political Geography 31(1): 3–14.
Yiftachel O (2001) Can Theory Be Liberated from Professional Constraints? On Rationality and Explanatory Power in Flyvbjerg’s. Rationality and Power. International Planning Studies 6(3): 251–255.
Yiftachel O and Ghanem A (2004) Understanding ‘Ethnocratic’ Regimes: The Politics of Seizing Contested Territories. Political Geography 23(6): 647–676.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Laura Michael, Brendan Murtagh and Linda Price
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michael, L., Murtagh, B., Price, L. (2016). Where Conflict and Peace Take Place: Memorialization, Sacralization and Post-Conflict Space. In: Björkdahl, A., Buckley-Zistel, S. (eds) Spatializing Peace and Conflict. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137550484_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137550484_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-71553-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55048-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)