Skip to main content

Preferential Trade Agreements at the Turn of the Century

  • Chapter
Latin American Economic Crises

Part of the book series: International Economic Association ((IEA))

  • 125 Accesses

Abstract

I first met Rolf and Ana Maria Mantel at Yale in the early 1960s. I was then teaching at Yale. Both Rolf and Ana Maria were in my graduate econometrics course in the fall of 1964 as auditors, if my memory serves me right. Econometrics in those days consisted mostly of the standard linear regression and simultaneous equation models of the Cowles Commission and the then new tobit models. Analytical developments in theory and econometrics have been dramatic in the past four decades, and Rolf, although he also developed an interest in applied theory and policy, remained a distinguished theorist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, K. and R. Blackhurst (eds) (1993) Regional Integration in the Global Trading System (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1996a) ‘Preferential Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System’, Columbia University, NY (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1996b) ‘Reciprocal Trade Liberalization’, NBER working paper no. 5488, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1996c) ‘Regionalism and Multilateral Tariff Cooperation’, Columbia University NY (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1997a) ‘Multilateral Tariff Cooperation during the Formation of Regional Free Trade Areas’, International Economic Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 271–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1997b) ‘Multilateral Tariff Cooperation during the Formation of Customs Unions’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 42, nos 1/2, pp. 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1999a) ‘Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT’, Department of Economics, Columbia University, NY (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (1999b) ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’, American Economic Review, vol. 89, no. 1 (March), pp. 215–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and A. Venables (1995) ‘Regional Economic Integration’, in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds), Handbook oflnternational Economics, Vol. III (Amsterdam NL: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., D. Cole, A. Sapir and A. Venables (eds) (1998) Regional Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, D. (1993) ‘Equalizing Exchange: Trade Liberalization and Income Convergence’, Quarterly journal ofEconomics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 653–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1991) The World Trading System at Risk (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., P. Krishna and A. Panagariya (1997) Analyzing Preferential Trading Agreements: Alternative Approaches (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. (1999) ‘Multilateralism, Regionalism, and the Sustainability of Natural Trading Blocs’, Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W. and A. Winters (1999) ‘How Regional Blocs Affect Excluded Countries: The Price Effects of MERCOSUR’, discussion paper no. 2179, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P. A. and I. Ekeland (1999) ‘Aggregation and Market Demand: An Exterior Differential Calculus Viewpoint’, Econometrica, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1435–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Melo, J. and A. Panagariya (eds) (1993) New Dimensions in Regional Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. and J. Portes (1998) ‘Returns to Regionalism: An Analysis of Nontraditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (1997) Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B. and P. C. Mavroidis (1999) ‘Enforcing Multilateral Commitments: Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries’, paper given at Conference on Developing Countries and the Millennium Round, 20–1 September 1999, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. and H. Wan (1976) ‘An Elementary Proposition Concerning the Formation of Customs Unions’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 6, pp. 95–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1999) ‘Rules of Origin as Protectionist Devices’, in J. Melvin, J. Moore and R. Reisman (eds), International Trade Theory: Essays in Honor of John Chipman (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991) ‘Is Bilateralism Bad?’, in E. Helpman and A. Razin (eds), International Trade and Trade Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1997) ‘A Political Economic Analysis of Free Trade Agreements’, American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 506–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1999) ‘Asymmetric Information and Inference from Free Trade Agreements’, Department of Economics, Yale University (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludema, R. (1999) ‘Why are Preferential Trade Agreements Regional?’, Department of Economics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, R. and A. Martirena-Mantel (1980) ‘Economic Integration, Income Distribution and Consumption: A New Rationale for Economic Integration’ (ch. 13) in R. Ferber (ed.), Consumption and Income Distribution in Latin America, an ECIEL book for the Organization of American States, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, R. and A. Martirena-Mantel (1982) ‘On the Measurement of the Social Benefits of a Customs Union’, Anales de la AsociaciOn Argentina de Economia Politica, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (in Spanish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. and L. A. Winters (eds) (1996) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puga, D. and A. Venables (1998) ‘Trading Arrangements and Industrial Development’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 221–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raff, H. (1998a) ‘Politics and the New Regionalism’, Department of Economics, Indiana University (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, H. (1998b) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements and Tax Competition for Footloose Firms’, Department of Economics, Indiana University (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. and A. Warner (1995) ‘Economic Reforms and the Process of Global Integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, M. and L. A. Winters (1998) ‘Dynamics and Politics in Regional Integration Arrangements: An Introduction’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 177–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soloaga, I. and L. A. Winters (1999) ‘Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?’, discussion paper no. 2183, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1998a) ‘Regionalism and the World Trade Organization: Is Non-Discrimination Passé?’, in A. O. Krueger (ed.), The World Trade Organization as an International Institution (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 329–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1998b) Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: From the GATT (1947) to the Uruguay Round and the Future Beyond (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Syropoulos, C. (1999) ‘Customs Unions and Comparative Advantage’, Oxford Economic Papers, no. 51, pp. 239–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999) Trade and Development Report, 1999 (New York and Geneva: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvakidis, A. (1998) ‘Regional Integration and Economic Growth’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 251–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G. (1989) ‘The Prenegotiation Phase of the Uruguay Round’, in J. Gross Stein (ed.), Getting to the Table (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L. A. (1998) ‘Regionalism and Multilateralism’, in R. Baldwin, D. Cole, A. Sapir and A. Venables (eds), Regional Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1996) ‘The Road Ahead: International Trade Policy in the Era of the WTO’, the Fourth Annual Sylvia Ostry Lecture, Ottawa, WTO Press/49, 29 May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeats, A. (1998) ‘Does Mercosur’s Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements?’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Srinivasan, T.N. (2004). Preferential Trade Agreements at the Turn of the Century. In: Bour, E., Heymann, D., Navajas, F. (eds) Latin American Economic Crises. International Economic Association. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403943859_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics