Skip to main content

Institutional factors in natural resource management in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

  • Chapter
Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa

Abstract

This chapter examines the institutional factors governing the existing patterns of communal rangelands utilization in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. The discussion covered various institutional factors particularly those relevant to natural resource management at the communal level. Informal institutions such as customary laws and traditional institutions seem to have gone out of fashion in many places while in a number of communities indigenous institutions still operate but competitions between them and State structures has resulted in conflicts and confusion over definition, responsibilities, management procedures and enforcement mechanisms. A key finding is that lack of government support to communities has resulted in the poor management of resources. The consequence of this has been deterioration of the rangelands and impoverishment of the communities. The indication is that transaction costs and good governance structures are important in the common property institution and high levels of trust and cooperation between members are necessary to reduce these transaction costs. Furthermore, collective action on communal lands enables communities to share ideas on how best to manage their resources to ensure sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Masters dissertation on which this chapter is based was supervised in part by Professor Gavin Fraser at the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Fort Hare and his contributions are gratefully acknowledged. Dr Sikhalazo Dube led the project under which this research was funded and his generous support is equally gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • Adhikari, B. (2001). Property rights and natural resources: impact of common property institutions on community-based resource management. Available at: http://www.gdnet.org/pdf/adhikari.pdf.

  • Ainsle, A. (1999). When community is not enough: managing common property natural resources in rural South Africa. Development Southern Africa 16, 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsle, A. (2002). Cattle ownership and production in the communal areas of Eastern Cape, South Africa. Research report no.10. Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricultural Digest (2005). Agricultural unions. Available at: http://www.nda.agric.za/docs/Digest2000/Digest10.htm.

  • Ankomah, B. and R. Fox (2000). Property rights and land use regulation: a comparative evaluation. Agrekon 39, 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, C. and Z. Ntshona (2003). Transforming roles but not reality? Private and forestry development on the wild coast, South Africa. Available at: http://www.propoortourism.org.uk/Publications/SLSA_ASHLEY_Ntshona.pdf.

  • Bennett, J. and H. Barrett (2003). Rangeland management in communal areas of the central Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. A case study of two contrasting cases. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 20, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauteseth, N.L. (2000). Environmental law. Available at: http://www.lawinfo.org.za/general/lawinfo.asp.

  • Breedlove, G. (2002). South African conservation policies. Available at: http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08062003122913/unrestricted/02.pdf.

  • Buckles, D. and G. Rusnak (2006). Conflict and collaboration in natural resource management. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/Public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN122242.pdf.

  • Chapeyama, O. (2004). Rangeland management in Lesotho: Report on assessment of needs for reintroduction of grazing fees. Available at: http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0001094/P1207-Lesotho_June2004.pdf.

  • Cocks, A., M. Dold and I. Grundy (2006). Challenges facing a community structure to implement CBNRM in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Available at: http://www.africa.uf.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a4.htm.

  • Coetzee, L., R. Manshwe and A. Jooste (2005). The marketing of livestock on communal lands in the Eastern Cape Province: constraints, challenges and implications for extension services. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 34, 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commark Trust, (2003). Red meat — Eastern Cape. Available at: http://www.commark.org/pages/Default.asp?SectionID=191.

  • Corbett, A. and B. Daniels (1996). The legal aspects of Governance in CBNRM in Namibia. Available at: http://www.cbnrm.net/pdf/corbett-001.pdf.

  • Cousins, B. (1995). Common property institutions and land reform in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 12, 583–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, B. (1999). The contribution of communal rangelands to the rural livelihoods in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 16, 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIR (2004). 2004 Eastern Cape State of the Environment Report. CSIR, Division of Water, Environment and Forestry Thechnology. Durban, South Africa. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.za/soer/ecape/download_report.htm.

  • De Bruyn, T., P. Lent, and N. Van Averbeke (2000). Policies on natural resource management. Available at: http://les.man.ac/ses/research/CAFRE/indicators/wp4.pdf.

  • Department of Agriculture, (2003). Department of Agriculture Strategic plan 2003–2006. Available at: http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=70175.

  • Deshingkar, P. and S. Cinderby (1999). Renewable natural resource use in post-apartheid South Africa: Summary of key issues and fndings. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wet, C. (1995). Moving together drifing apart: betterment planning and villagisation in South African homeland. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvel, C.H. and D.B Aful (1997). Towards understanding of stocking rate decisions for commercial rangelands in South Africa: The role of culture. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 26, 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastern Cape Parks (2007). Overview of east London coast nature reserve. Available at: http://www.ecparks.co.za/.

  • Eastern Cape Provincial Government (2006). The Eastern Cape Province. Available at: http://www.ecprov.gov.za/index.php?module=press_releases.

  • Engel, A. and B. Korf (2005). Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0032e/a0032e00.htm.

  • Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (1999). South Africa — National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.za/polleg/legislation/natenvmgmtact/natenvmgmtact.htm.

  • Food and Agricultural Organisation (1991). Sustainable agriculture and development in Asia and the Pacifc. Regional document No. 2 FAO/Netherlands Conference on Agriculture and Environment, S-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghee, T. and Valencia, M. J., (1990). Confict over natural resources in South-East Asia and the Pacifc. Available at: http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/80a04e/80A04E00.htm.

  • Gopalakrishnan, S. (2005). Collective action in the management of common resource: is there an alternative to the rationale choice model. Unpublished MSc thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, D. (2002). Biodiversity and performance of grassland ecosystems in communal and commercial farming systems in South Africa. Proceedings of the FAO ’s Biodiversity and Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Event: 12–13 October, 2002. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp. 10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, M.T., S. Todd, Z. Ntshona and S. Turner (eds.) (1999). Land degradation in South Africa. Department of Environment Afairs and Tourism, Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Center for Living Aquatic Resource Management (1996). Analysis of fsheries co-management arrangements: a research framework. Available at: http://www.ifm.dk/reports/21.pdf.

  • Kariuki, S.M. (2004). Failing to learn from failed programmes? South Africa ’s communal land rights act (ClaRA 2004). Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/dspace/bitstream/1887/488/1/02PUB0000001753.pdf.

  • Kirkland, T., M.L. Hunter, and W. Twine (2005). The bush is no more: insights on institutional change and natural resource availability in rural South Africa. Society & Natural Resources 20, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowero, G., M. Bruce, U. Campell, and R. Sumaila (2003). Policies and governance structures in woodlands of Southern Africa. Available at: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_fles/Books/policies/PoliciesSouthernAfrica-1.pdf.

  • Letsoala, R. (1987). The betterment planning. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/sei/projects/booklet.pdf.

  • Makhanya, M.E. (1999). The sustainability of rural systems under the communal property association act in South Africa. Available at: http://www.iucn.org/themes/ceesp/publication/Makhanya.pdf.

  • Masiteng, T.J., C. Van De Westhuizen and M. Matli (2003). Aspiration and needs of farmers on communal grazing areas in the Free State. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 32, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiru, V., N. Hart and P. Castro (eds.) (2000). Confict and natural resource management. FAO, Department of Forestry, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, J.C. (1997). Rethinking ancestors in Africa. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/view/00019720/ap040255/04a00060/0.

  • McCarthy, N., B.M. Swallow, T. Kirk. and P. Hazell (2000). Property rights, risk, and livestock development in Africa. International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, M. and M.T. Hofman (2002). The nature, extent and causes of land degradation in South Africa: legacy of the past, lessons for the future? Available at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1475-4762.00100?cookieSet=1.

  • Messer, N.M. (2001). Mapping traditional structures in decentralisation policies: illustrations from three countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Near East. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/ad721e/ad721e00.htm#Contents.

  • Multi Purpose Community Centers (2004). Available at: http://www.gcis.gov.za/.

  • Ngaido, T. and N. Mccarthy, (2004). Collective action and property rights for sustainable development: institutional options for managing rangelands. Available at: http://www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus11/focus11_09.pdf.

  • Nilsson, T. (2001). Management of communal grazing land: A case study on institutions for collective action in Endabeg village, Tanzania. Available at: http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00000961/00/WebThesis.pdf.

  • Nkosi, Z. (2005). Spirituality, land and land reform in South Africa. Available at: http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/jpc/echoes-16-05.html.

  • Nothard, B.W., G.F. Ortmann and E. Meyer (2005). Institutional and resource constraints performance in the small-scale sugar cane industry in Kwa-Zulu Natal. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 34, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omamo, S.W. (2005). Institutional costs as a theoretical framework for transformation in agriculture. Agrekon 45, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G.F. (2000). Promoting competitiveness in South African agriculture and agribusiness. The role of institutions. Agrekon 39, 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel, G.S. and G.B. Tapa (2003). Impact of social, institutional and ecological factors on land management practices in mountain watersheds of Nepal. Applied Geography 24, 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. (1997). Urban land and property rights in developing countries. Intermediate technology publications: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, K. (2003). Co-operatives in South Africa: their role in job creation and poverty reduction. Available at: http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0000786/P872-Coops_October2003.pdf.

  • Peden, M.I. (2005). Tackling the most avoided issue: communal rangeland management in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 22, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quail Report (1980). Ciskei commission report. Conference Associates (Ltd), Pretoria, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, C.H., H. Huby, C. Kiwasila and J.C. Lovett (2007). Design principles and common pool management: An institutional approach to evaluating community management in semi-arid Tanzania. Journal of Environmental Management 84, 100–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, R. (2002). A conceptual map of land confict management: Organizing the parts of two puzzles. Land Tenure Service, FAO Rural Development Division, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://www.fao.org/sd/2002/IN0301a_en.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. (2005). Traditional customary laws and indigenous peoples in Asia. Minority Rights Group International. Available at: http://www.minorityrights.org/download.php?id=131.

  • Sanginga, P.C., R.N. Kamugisha and A.M. Martin (2007). The dynamics of social capital and confict management in multiple resource regimes: a case of the southwestern highlands of Uganda. Ecology and Society 12 (1), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scogings, P., P. Lent and R. Bally (2000). Policy and institutional frameworks for natural resource management. Available at: http://les.man.ac/ses/research/CAFRE/indicators/wp4.pdf.

  • Shackleton, C. (1993). Are communal rangelands in need of saving? Development Southern Africa 10, 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, C. and B. Cousins (2000). Re-valuing the communal rangelands of South Africa: new understanding of rural livelihoods. Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/62.html.

  • Smajgl, A., K. Vella and R. Greiner (2003). Frameworks and models for analysis and design of property rights in Outback regions. Scoping report Desert Knowledge CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soga, J.H. (1937). The Ama-xosa life and customs. Lovedale press: South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. and S. Treurnicht (2001). Culture as a resource for development: some challenges for extension management. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 30, 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatuk, L.A. (1996). Environmental issues and prospects for South African regional co-operation. Available at: http://www.iss.co.za/Monographs/No4/Swatuk.html.

  • Terblanche, S.E. (2005). Participation and linkages for improved extension delivery: The role of the extension worker. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 34, 122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, O. (1998). Multiple uses of common pool resources in semi-Arid West Africa: a survey of existing practices and options for sustainable resource management. Available at: http://www.Odi.org.uk/nrp/38.html.

  • Tonah, S. (2002). Migrant Fulani herdsmen, indigenous farmers and the contest for land in Northern Ghana. Available at: http://www.vad-ev.de/papers/tonah.pdf.

  • Tshabalala, M.T. (1995). The social organization of range utilization and livestock production in Lesotho. Grassland Society of South Africa. Pietermaritzburg, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. (2000). Common property design principles and development in a Honduran community. Available at: http://fetcher.tufs.edu/praxis/archives/xv/Tucker.pdf.

  • Twine, W.C. (2005). Socio-economic transactions influence vegetation change in the communal rangelands of South African lowvelds. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 22, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uma, T., G. Gebru, A. Aboud, and D. Little (2003). Borana pastoralists of Southern Ethiopia: the role of indigenous institutions in resource and risk management. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 20, 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Averbeke, W. (2000). Policy and institutional frameworks for natural resource management. Available at: http://les.man.ac/ses/research/CAFRE/indicators/wp4.pdf.

  • Vink, N. (1989). An institutional approach to livestock development in South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension. University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2000).Confict management in community-based natural resource projects: experiences from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp135.pdf.

  • Wendel, K. (2004). Institutions and common pool resource: a case study of grazing land in the Matsheng area, Kgalgadi District, Botswana. Available at: http://epubl.luth.se/1404-5508/2004/233/LTU-SHU-EX-04233-SE.pdf.

  • World Bank (2004). Rural poverty in Africa. Available at: http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/english/regions/africa/index.htm.

  • Zenani, V. and A. Mistri (2003). A desktop study on the cultural and religious uses of water using regional case studies from South Africa. Available at: http://www.dwaf.gov.za/Documents/Other/RMP/SAADFCulturalWaterUseJun05.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mokhahlane, M., Obi, A. (2011). Institutional factors in natural resource management in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. In: Obi, A. (eds) Institutional constraints to small farmer development in Southern Africa. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-704-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics