Skip to main content
  • 328 Accesses

Abstract

In human history, some geniuses( works were unappreciated in their lifetime. For example, Évariste Galois( mathematical contributions were finally published and declared correct in 1843, eleven years after his death.41

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://xcis-pro.com/favorite.html.

  2. 2.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/genius.

  3. 3.

    The scientific community at the time believed that pangenesis were responsible for inheritance. For example, Darwin(s theory of evolution used pangenesis instead of Mendel(s model of inheritance (Henig 2000).

  4. 4.

    In 1900, Mendel(s contribution was rediscovered by Hugo De Vries and Carl Correns (Henig 2000).

  5. 5.

    http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/2003/11/25/cx_1125hot.html.

  6. 6.

    http://bonniebutterfeld.com/vincentvangogh.htm. Given that Van Gogh had never sold any painting successfully before, as an economist, it is interesting to speculate who was the buyer of Van Gogh(s painting, ‘The Red Vineyard’. There are two possible buyers: either this buyer is another genius who appreciates Van Gogh(s talent or this buyer buys Van Gogh(s painting on the philanthropic ground. If the reason is the latter one, then it is reasonable to speculate that this buyer is his brother Theodorus who continually and selflessly provided financial support to Van Gogh throughout Van Gogh(s lifetime. However, source supports the former. It is reported that the buyer was Anne Boch, also a painter, who bought ‘The Red Vineyard’ in Brussels for 400 francs (http://www.nicks.com.au/index.aspx?link_id=76.1257). It is also reported that Ms. Boch loved to promote young artists including Van Gogh whom she admired for his talent.

  7. 7.

    According to a report, Albert Einstein(s 1905 paper was ignored by the physics community. This began to change after he received the attention of just one physicist, perhaps the most influential physicist of his generation, Max Planck, the founder of the quantum theory. Soon, owing to Planck(s laudatory comments and experiments that gradually confirmed his theories, Einstein was invited to give lectures at international meetings, such as the Solvay Conferences, and he rose to fame rapidly in the academic world. After he presented his paper on November 6, 1919, the headline of The Times of London read, ‘Revolution in science — New theory of the universe — Newton(s ideas overthrown — Momentous pronouncement — Space ‘warped’. Almost immediately, Einstein became a world-renowned physicist, the successor to Isaac Newton. Invitations came pouring in for him to speak around the world. In 1921. Einstein began his first world tour, visiting the United States, England, Japan and France. Everywhere he went, the crowds numbered in the thousands (http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-256584/albert-einstein).

  8. 8.

    During World War II, Dali took refuge in the United States, returning after the war(s ended in Spain. His international reputation ‘continued to grow, based as much on his flamboyance and flair for publicity as on his prodigious output of paintings, graphic works, and book illustrations; and designs for jewelry, textiles, clothing, costumes, shop interiors, and stage sets( (http://www.rain.org/̃artworks/dali/history.html).

  9. 9.

    Albert Einstein was nominated for and denied the Nobel Award eight times between 1910 and 1921 (http://www.pentrace.net/penbase/data_returns/full_article.asp?id=466).

  10. 10.

    Creativity in painting is deliberately chosen in this study. Scientific innovations, such as in mathematics or chemistry, can be tested ‘objectively’ against the physical world and hence, its acceptance can be based on its applicability or practicability. Unlike scientific innovations, a judgment on a painting involves aesthetic and is highly subjective. Acceptance of a painting can hardly be tested objectively in terms of applicability or practicability. It bases on judgments of sentiment and taste.

  11. 11.

    In his classic work, The Sensory Order, Hayek (1952/1976) explains the perception process in term of classification problem exercised in human minds. See Yu (2007).

  12. 12.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/theoriginof_theworkofart.

  13. 13.

    He was also a sculptor, printmaker, ceramicist and stage designer.

  14. 14.

    All quotes from Picasso in this paper are retrieved from the BrainyQuote website (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/p/pablopicas397437.html).

  15. 15.

    The Cubist movement began in 1906 with Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque who lived in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, France. Cubism influenced artists of the first decade of the 20th century. It gave rise to the development of new trends in art like futurism, constructivism and expressionism. Innovative artists, Braque and Picasso, sought new ways to express space and form in painting. Cubism does not aspire to real vision, but to the artist(s mental experience of the world. Thus a new ‘writing of the real’ (Kahnweiler) was developed, put into practice by Braque and Picasso first in the so-called Analytical phase which is dominated by a ‘reality of conception’, to which the representation of the world submits (http://www.gamelow.com/painters-c/cubist.php).

  16. 16.

    This is the case in the late Ching dynasty when government officials in the imperial China first time contacted with foreign technologies that they did not understand. With fear, they condemned those technologies as miseries, bizarre and evils and therefore should be shielded of (Yu and Kwan 2003: 75).

  17. 17.

    http://www.edinformatics.com/great_thinkers/picasso.htm.

  18. 18.

    According to Karl Popper, ‘science does not advance by repeated attempts at confirmation of hypotheses. Rather it involves endless testing, the constant overthrow of existing scientific theories and their replacement by wholly new and better kinds of knowledge, that is, the new systems of theories of ever greater content’ (Harper 1996: 61).

  19. 19.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/karl_popper.

References

  • Addleson, M. (1995) Equilibrium Versus Understanding: Towards the Restoration of Economics as Social Theory. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, vol. 4, 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and G. Fagiolo (1997) Explaining the Unknown on Entrepreneurship, Coordination and Innovation Driven Growth. International Institute for Applied System Analysis Report, IR-97-077, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, S. (1995) Hayek(s Political Economy: The Socio-economics of Order. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galenson, D.W. (2010) Understanding Creativity. NBER Working Paper 16024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D.A. (1996) Entrepreneurship and the Market Process: An Inquiry into the Growth of Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. (1988) A Brief History of Time. New York, USA: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952/1976) The Sensory Order. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) Basic Writings. ‘On the Origin of the Work of Art’. 2nd edition. New York, USA: Harper Collin(s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, R.M. (2000) Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. Orlando, USA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehenson, R. (1973) A Phenomenological Approach to the Study of the Formal Organisation. In: G. Psathas (ed.) Phenomenological Sociology Issues and Applications. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley, pp. 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1987) Choosing Action Research: A Rationale. In: I.L. Mangham (ed.) Organisation Analysis and Development. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M.J. (1984) Adaptors and Innovators. Long Range Planning, vol. 17 (2), 137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J. (1989) A Subjective Appraisal of Austrian Economics. In: B.J. Loasby, The Mind and Method of the Economist. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • O(Driscoll Jr., G.P. and M. Rizzo (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. (1999) The Economics of the Mind. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. (2000) Economic Change, Subjective Perception, and Institutional Evolution.Metroeconomica, vol. 51 (2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1962/2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York, USA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker (1971) Communication of Innovations: a Cross-Cultural Approach, 2nd edition. New York, UK: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934/1961) The Theory of Economic Development. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred (1962) Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. M. Natanson (ed.), The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1970) On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. and T. Luckmann (1989) The Structures of the Life World. Vol. II. Evanston, USA: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, L. (1988) Leadership/communication: A Critical Review and a Modest Proposal. In: G.M. Goldhaber and G.A. Barnett (eds.) Handbook of Organisational Communication. Northwood, USA: Ablex, pp. 231–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1921/1968) Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. M. Rheinstein (ed.), Translated by E. Shils and M. Rheinstein. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1969) The Social Psychology of Organising. Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995) Sensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigert, A.J. (1981) Sociology of Everyday Life. New York, USA: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.H. (1977) Uncertainty and Entrepreneurial Expectation in Economic Theory. Unpublished Senior Honours Thesis. Harvard College, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F-L.T. (2007) Entrepreneur(s Interpretation, Innovation and Coordination in Austrian Subjectivist Perspective. Global Business and Economics Review, vol. 9 (2/3), 255–270. (Special Issue on Applied Behavioural Economics).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu F-L.T. and D. Kwan (2003) Learning, Catching Up and International Economic Order: Trilateral Relationship between China, Britain and Hong Kong in the Entrepreneurial Perspective. In: East Asian Business Systems in Evolutionary Perspective: Entrepreneurship and Coordination. New York, USA: Nova Science, pp. 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F-L.T. and P.L. Robertson (1999) Austrian and Evolutionary Perspectives on Consumer Demand and Firm Strategy. In: S.C. Dow and P.E. Earl (eds.) Economic Organisation and Economic Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Brian Loasby, Volume I. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 76–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fu-Lai Tony Yu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, FL.T. (2011). Innovation and communication. In: New perspectives on economic development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-716-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics