Skip to main content

Consumer behaviour towards organic food in Portugal

  • Chapter
Consumer attitudes to food quality products

Part of the book series: EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science ((EAAP,volume 133))

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an analysis of Portuguese consumer behaviour towards organic food products (OFP). For this purpose, a literature review on quality and food safety of OFP was carried out and a consumer survey was implemented, with data collected by means of personal interviews in the capital city of the country. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and a comparison of gender and age groups was made using chi-square tests and analysis of variance. Factor analysis was used for the attitudinal scales in order to reduce the number of variables and to search for dimensions underlying these attitudes. The results show positive consumer attitudes towards OFP. However, its consumption is much lower than could be expected from these attitudes. Intentions to buy OFP are quite high, suggesting that these products might obtain a substantial market share in the future. This is an encouraging sign for potential OFP producers, who might compensate for the costs of moving from traditional to organic farming with an increase in market share.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AFSSA, 2003. Evaluation nutritionnelle et sanitaire des aliments issus de l’agriculture biologique. Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Maisons-Alfort, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvensleben, R., 1998. Ecological aspects of food demand: the case of organic food in Germany. AIR-CAT 4th Plenary Meeting: Health, Ecological and Safety aspects in food choice, 4: 68-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvensleben, R. and M. Altmann, 1987. Determinants of the demand for organic on German. Acta Horticulturae, 202: 235-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beharrell, B. and J.H. Macfie, 1991. Consumer attitudes to organic foods. British Food Journal, 93 (2): 25-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, M., J.S. Fox and D. Mark, 1999. Consumer willingness-to-pay for pork produced under an integrated meat safety system. Western Association of Agricultural Economists Annual Meeting, Fargo, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourn, D. and J. Prescott, 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 42(1): 1-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, K. and J.P. Molgaard 2001. Organic agriculture: does it enhance or reduce the nutritional value of plant foods? Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81: 924-931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, A. and P. Lindskog, 2003. Livdsmedelskvalitet-är nägon skillnad?, In: Johansson, B. (ed.) Ar eko reko? Om ecologiskt lantbruk in Svergie, Formas, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsø, K. and K. Grunert, 2002. Consumers’ food choice and quality perception. Working paper 7 The MAPP Centre, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diver, S., 2000. Nutritional quality of organically grow food. ATTRA (Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas) report, Arkansas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, L., 1989. Vegetable consumption and consumer attitudes towards organically grown vegetables – the case of Sweden. Acta Horticulturae, 259: 163-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finesilver, T., T. Johns and S.B. Hill, 1989. Comparison of food quality of organically versus conventionally grown plant foods Ecological Agriculture Projects, Report. MacDonald College, McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J.M., A. Gracia and M. Sanchez, 2000. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3: 207-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindasamy, R. and J. Italia 1999. Predicting willingness-to-pay a premium for organically grown fresh produce. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 30: 44-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grankvist, G. and A. Biel, 2001. The importance of beliefs and purchase criteria in the choice of eco-labelled food products. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21: 405-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, Å., 1998. Sensory quality of tomato, carrot and wheat. Influences of growing systems. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, J.B. Babin, R.E. Anderson and R.L. Tatham, 2009. Multivariate data analysis. 6th edition. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, S., 2001. Organic farming, food quality and human health: a review of the evidence, Soil Association, Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.H., 1996. Consumer preferences and attitudes towards organically grown produce. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 23: 331-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L., Å Haglund, L. Berglund, P. Lea and E. Risvik, 1999. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 10: 289-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, D., 1991. Differences between buyers and non-buyers of organic produce and willingness to pay organic price premiums. Journal of Agribusiness, 9: 97-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsäll, A., 2000. Sensory quality of pork. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth, N., O. Tietje and R. Scholz, 2000. Food purchases: Impacts from the consumers’ point of view investigated with a modular LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(3): 134-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampkin, N., 1990. Organic farming. Farming Press, Ipswich, UK, pp. 557-575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, E. and A. Worsley, 2008. Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite, 50(2-3): 207-214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., K. Lyons, G. Lawrence and J. Grice, 2004. Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers. Appetite, 43(2): 135-146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, M.L. and S. Hine, 2002. Discovering niche markets: a comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic and GMO-free Products. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 34 (3): 477-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M.R., 2004. El sector de productos ecológicos en Portugal, in Agricultura ecológica y alimentación – análisis y funcionamiento de la cadena comercial de productos ecológicos. Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero, Mundi-Prensa Libros, S.A., Madrid, Spain, pp. 277-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M.R., K. Röhrich, C. Marreiros, R. Fragoso, R. Kabbert, A.M. Clara, I. Martins and S. Böhm, 2008. Quality, Safety and Consumer Behaviour Towards Organic Food in Germany and Portugal, CEFAGE-UE Working Paper 2008/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüth, M. and A. Spiller, 2005. New consumer segments for organic food – results from a brand choice experiment, paper presented on 15th Annual World Forum, Symposium and Case Conference, IFAMA, June 25-28, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M.K., A. Arvola, U.-K. Koivisto Hursti, L. Aberg and P.O. Sjödén, 2001. Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal, 103(3): 209-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M.K., A. Arvola, U.-K. Koivisto Hursti, L. Aberg and P.O. Sjödén, 2003. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite, 40(2): 109-117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M., 2004. Consumer perception of organic and genetically modified foods – health and environmental considerations. PhD Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, P., A. Schmanke and E. Linnert, 2003. Bio-frische im LEH: fakten zum verbraucherverhalten. Materialien zur Marktberichterstattung der ZMP 45, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midmore, P., S. Naspetti, A. Sherwood, D. Vairo, M. Wier and R. Zanoli, 2005. Consumer attitudes to quality and safety of organic and low input foods: a review. Deliverable 1.2 of Subproject 1, Integrated Project Nº 506358, University of Wales Aberystwyth, School of Management and Business, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, S.L., 1990. Supermarket shoppers’ pesticide concerns and willingness to purchase certified pesticide residue-free fresh produce. Agribusiness, 6: 593-602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricquart, M., 2004. Consumer demands regarding the Canadian organic food sector. Option Consommateurs, Association des Consommateurs du Quebéc, Canadá,

    Google Scholar 

  • Roddy, G., C.A. Cowan and G. Hutchinson, 1996. Consumer attitudes and behaviour to organic foods in Ireland. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9: 41-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffron, L., 1998. Organic food and cancer risk. Positive Health, 30, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein, H. and P.O. Ophuis, 1998. Health related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Quality and Preference, 9: 119-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, R., M. Magnusson and P.O. Sjödén, 2005. Determinants of consumer behavior related to organic foods. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 34(4): 352-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, L., B. Juric and T.B. Cornwell, 2001. Level of market development and intensity of organic food consumption: Cross-cultural study of Danish and New Zealand consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(4/5): 392-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, H., M. Stolze, M. Janssen and U. Hamm, 2011. Preferences and determinants for organic, conventional and conventional-plus products – the case of occasional organic consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 22: 772-779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.D. and J. Kidwell, 1998. Explaining the choice of organic produce: cosmetic defects, prices, and consumer preferences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 277-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, C., V. Visschers and M. Siegrist, 2011. Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57 (3): 674-682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, P. A. Andrén and L. Björck, 2002. Composition of raw milk from sustainable production systems. International Dairy Journal, 12: 75-80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torjusen, H., G. Lieblein, M. Wandel and C. Francis, 2001. Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Quality and Preferences, 12: 207-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, R., 2006. Segurança alimentar e comportamento do consumidor em Portugal. Msc Dissertation, Évora University, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregear, A., J.B. Dent and M.J. Mcgregor, 1994. The demand for organically grown produce. British Food Journal, 96 (4): 21-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, S.E. and E.E. Figueroa, 1996. Consumer preferences for non-conventionally grown produce. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 27: 56-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ravenswaay, E.O. and J.R. Blend, 1999. Consumer demand for eco-labeled apples: results from econometric estimation. American Agricultural Association Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoog, H., M. Matze, E.L. van Bueren and T. Baars, 2003. The role of the concept of the natural (naturalness) in organic farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16(1): 29-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, H., M. von Abercron, R. Bischoff, W. Kampe, A. Klasink and K. Ranff, 1987. Qualitat pflanzlicher Nahrungsmittel – ‘alternativ’ und ‘modern’ im Vergleich. Teil III. AID-Schriftenreihe Verbraucherdienst, 3100, pp. 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandel, M. and A. Bugge, 1997. Environmental concern in consumer evaluation of food quality. Food Quality and Preference, 8: 19-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R.D., D.J. Evans and A.E. Luloff, 1992. Pesticide use in tomato production: consumer concerns and willingness-to-pay. Agribusiness, 8: 131-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wier, M., K. Jensen, L. Andersen, K. Millock and L. Rosenkvist, 2005. The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. and V. Hillers, 1994. Influences of pesticide residue and environmental concerns on organic food preference among food cooperative members and non-members in Washington State. Journal of Nutrition Education, 26: 26-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., 2002. Nutritional quality of organic food: shades of grey or shades of green, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 61: 19-24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.M., T.H. Pennington, O. Bridges and J.W. Bridges, 2000. Food quality and health. Shades of Green, a review of UK farming systems. Royal Agriculture Society of England, UK, pp. 73-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woese, K., D. Lange, C. Boess and K. Werner, 1997. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods: results of a review of the relevant literature. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture, 74: 281-293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, V., 1998. Effect of agricultural methods on nutritional quality: a comparison of organic with conventional crops. Alternative Therapy and Health Medication, 4 (1): 58-69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, V., 2001. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 7(2): 161-173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetti, C., 1998. La disponibilità a pagare dei consumatori per prodotti alimentari sicuri. La Questione Agraria, 72: 133-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanoli, R. and S. Nasppetti, 2002. Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: a means-end approach. British Food Journal, 104 (8): 643-653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoli, R. and S. Nasppetti, 2004. Do consumers care about where they buy organic products? A means-end study with evidence from Italian Data. In Baourakis, G. (ed.). Marketing trends for organic food in the 21st century. World Scientific, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanoli, R., 2005. How country-specific are consumer attitudes towards organic food? Available at: http://www.library.wur.nl/biola/bestanden/1740084-1.pdf.

  • Zanoli, R., M. Bähr, M. Botschen, H. Laberenz, S. Naspetti and E. Thelen, 2004. The European consumer and organic food. Organic marketing initiatives and rural development (Vol. 4). Aberystwyth: School of Management and Business, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Raquel Ventura-Lucas .

Editor information

Marija Klopčič Abele Kuipers Jean-François Hocquette

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ventura-Lucas, M.R., Marreiros, C. (2013). Consumer behaviour towards organic food in Portugal. In: Klopčič, M., Kuipers, A., Hocquette, JF. (eds) Consumer attitudes to food quality products. EAAP – European Federation of Animal Science, vol 133. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-762-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics