Skip to main content

A Meta-Analysis of Threatened Plant Reintroductions from across the Globe

  • Chapter
Plant Reintroduction in a Changing Climate

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

Reintroductions and associated methods have been recommended as techniques for mitigating or redressing threatened plant species declines for several decades. Their use continues to increase as an option for overcoming problems associated with habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and reproductive isolation (Quinn et al. 1994). However, these approaches have been criticized for the lack of monitoring and central recording, inappropriateness of the action due to genetic considerations, a lack of demographic knowledge of the donor populations, and inadequate information on the species’ habitat needs (Pearman and Walker 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Quinn, R. M., J. H. Lawton, B. C. Eversham, and S. N. Wood. 1994. The biogeography of scarce vascular plants in Britain with respect to habitat preference, dispersal ability and reproductive biology. Biological Conservation 70:149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman, D. A., and K. Walker. 2004. Rare plant introductions in the UK: Creative conservation or wildflower gardening? British Wildlife 15:174–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1998b. Species Survival Commission Reintroduction Specialist Group Members Database. Accessed February 1, 2011, http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/rsg_database.php.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. P. T., and S. G. Thompson. 2004. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine 23:1663–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp, USA. 2011. Stata version 11.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udvardy, M. 1975. A Classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the World. Man and Biosphere Programme. IUCN Occasional Paper No. 18. Morges, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamec, L., and J. Lev. 1999. The introduction of the aquatic carnivorous plant Aldrovanda vesiculosa to new potential sites in the Czech Republic: A five-year investigation. Folia Geobotanica 34:299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamec, L. 2005. Ten years after the introduction of Aldrovanda vesiculosa to the Czech Republic. Acta Botanica Gallica 152:239–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. A., C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell. 1996. Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. 1998a. Guidelines for Reintroductions. Prepared by IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, C. A., P. Andrew, A. P. Hendry, and M. T. Kinnison. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jusaitis, M. 2005. Translocation trials confirm specific factors affecting the establishment of three endangered plant species. Ecological Management and Restoration 6:61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, A. L., M. C. Brundrett, K. W. Dixon, and K. Sivasithamparam. 2006b. New methods to improve symbiotic propagation of temperate terrestrial orchid seedlings from axenic culture to soil. Australian Journal of Botany 54:367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, B., and R. B. Primack. 2000. Rates of success in the reintroduction by four methods of several perennial plant species in eastern Massachusetts. Rhodora 102:299–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Y. 2006a. Reintroduction of perennial knawel Scleranthus perennis prostratus to sheep-grazed grassheath at West Stow, Suffolk, England. Conservation Evidence 3:15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Y. 2006b. Soil disturbance & seedling transplanting as a method of reintroduction of perennial knawel Scleranthus perennis prostratus at Icklingham, Suffolk, England. Conservation Evidence 3:17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski, J., and J. Duquesnel. 2007. Successful reintroductions of the endangered long-lived Sargent’s cherry palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii, in the Florida Keys. Biological Conservation 134:122–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, P. L., and R. D. Laven. 1996. Selecting reintroduction sites. In Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 157–170. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C., A. Schnitzler, A. Douard, R. Peter, and F. Gillet. 2005. Is there a future for wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera subsp. silvestris) in the Rhine Valley? Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1507–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrhoff, L. A. 1996. FOCUS: Reintroducing endangered Hawaiian plants. In Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 101–20. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, S. E., and A. Broome. 2010. The importance of donor population identity and habitat type when creating new populations of small cow-wheat Melampyrum sylvaticum from seed in Perthshire, Scotland. Conservation Evidence 7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Plant Conservation. 2009. CPC International Reintroduction Registry. Accessed September 1, 2009, http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/reintroduction/MN_ReintroductionEntrance.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, S. E., A. Broome, and P. Gallagher. 2008. Re-introduction of small cow- wheat into the Scottish Highlands, UK. In Global Re-introduction Perspectives: Re- introduction Case-Studies from around the World, edited by P. S. Soorae, 221–24. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IUCN/SSC Re-Introduction Specialist Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacholder, S. 1986. Binomial regression in GLIM: Estimating risk ratios and risk differences. American Journal of Epidemiology 123:174–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DerSimonian, R., and N. Laird. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. 2009. Statistical Methods Group. Accessed February 1, 2011, http://www.environmentalevidence.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dalrymple, S.E., Banks, E., Stewart, G.B., Pullin, A.S. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Threatened Plant Reintroductions from across the Globe. In: Maschinski, J., Haskins, K.E., Raven, P.H. (eds) Plant Reintroduction in a Changing Climate. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-183-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics