Skip to main content

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Untargeted Drug Screening

  • Protocol
Clinical Applications of Mass Spectrometry in Drug Analysis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1383))

Abstract

While gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) continues to be the forensic standard for toxicology, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem MS offers significant operational advantages for targeted confirmatory analysis. LC-high-resolution (HR)-MS has recently been available that offers advantages for untargeted analysis. HR-MS analyzers include the Orbitrap and time-of-flight MS. These instruments are capable of detecting 1 ppm mass resolution. Following soft ionization, this enables the assignment of exact molecular formula, limiting the number of candidate compounds. With this technique, presumptive identification of unknowns can be conducted without the need to match MS library spectra or comparison against known standards. For clinical toxicology, this can greatly expand on the number of drugs and metabolites that can be detected and reported on a presumptive basis. Definitive assignments of the compound’s identity can be retrospectively determined with acquisition of the appropriate reference standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Renagarajan A, Mullins ME (2013) How often do false-positive phencyclidine urine screens occur with use of common medications? Clin Toxicol (Phila) 51(6):493–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wenk RE (2006) False-negative urine immunoassay after lorazepam overdose. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1600–1601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu AHB, Gerona R, Armenian P, French D, Petrie M, Lynch KL (2012) Role of liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR/MS) in clinical toxicology. Clin Toxicol 50:733–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ojanpera I, Kolmonen M, Pelander A (2012) Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in drug screening relevant to clinical and forensic toxicology and doping control. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1203–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crews BO, Pesce AJ, West R, Nguye H, Fitzgerald RL (2012) Evaluation of high-resolution mass spectrometry for urine toxicology screening in a pain management setting. J Anal Toxicol 36:601–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Croley TR, White KD, Callahan JH, Musser SM (2012) The chromatographic role in high resolution mass spectrometry for non-targeted analysis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 23:1569–1578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bush DM (2008) The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: current status and future considerations. Forensic Sci Int 174:111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarvie DR, Simpson D (1986) Drug screening: evaluation of the Toxi-lab TLC system. Ann Clin Biochem 23:76–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demedts P, Wauters A, Franck F, Neels H (1994) Evaluation of the Remedi drug profiling system. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 32:409–417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerona RR, Wu AH (2012) Bath salts. Clin Lab Med 32(3):415–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fattore L, Fratta W (2011) Beyond THC: the new generation of cannabinoid designer drugs. Front Behav Neurosci 5(60):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stogner JM (2014) The potential threat of acetyl fentanyl: legal issues, contaminated heroin, and acetyl fentanyl “disguised” as other opioids. Ann Emerg Med 64(6):637–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrie MS, Lynch KL, Wu AHB, Steinhardt AA, Horowitz GL (2012) Prescription compliance or illicit designer drug abuse? Clin Chem 58:1631–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graf J, Lynch K, Yeh CL, Tarter L, Richman N, Nguyen T, Kral A, Dominy S, Imboden J (2011) Purpura, cutaneous necrosis, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies associated with levamisole-adulterated cocaine. Arthritis Rheum 63:3998–4001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Title 21 US Code (USC) Controlled Substance Act. US Department of Justics, Drug Enforcement Agency. Office of Diversion Control. http://www.deadiversion.ucdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/812.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan H. B. Wu Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Wu, A.H.B., Colby, J. (2016). High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Untargeted Drug Screening. In: Garg, U. (eds) Clinical Applications of Mass Spectrometry in Drug Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1383. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3252-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3252-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3251-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3252-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics