Abstract
Due to the high failure rates of traditional dental restorations, there is an ongoing effort to develop modified and new restorative biomaterials in dentistry. Being the most commonly used restorative material, most of these efforts primarily aim to improve dental composite. Generally, the main objective of such modifications is to enhance the restorative physical and antimicrobial properties in order to limit micro-leakage and inhibit bacterial biofilm cultivation. Herein, we describe the process of designing a simple in vitro model to assess the physical and antimicrobial properties of novel restorative materials in addition to evaluating their effect on the fragile balance between enamel de- and remineralization.
Basma Sulaiman Ghandourah and Anna Lefkelidou contributed equally to this work
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH (1999) Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Prim Dent Care 6:17–20
Maupomé G, Sheiham A (1998) Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment. J Oral Rehabil 25:896–901. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00328.x
Elderton RJ, Osman YI (1991) Preventive versus restorative management of dental caries. J Dent Assoc S Afr 46:217–221
Drummond JL (2008) Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res 87:710–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700802
Leinfelder KF (1988) Posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 117:21E–26E
Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T et al (2003) Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review. Clin Oral Investig 7:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH (2001) An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 8:5–11
Kopperud SE, Tveit AB, Gaarden T et al (2012) Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure. Eur J Oral Sci 120:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12004
Sakaguchi RL (2005) Review of the current status and challenges for dental posterior restorative composites: clinical, chemistry, and physical behavior considerations. Summary of discussion from the Portland Composites Symposium (POCOS) June 17–19, 2004, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. In: Dental materials, pp 3–6
Van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2013) A six-year prospective randomized study of a nano-hybrid and a conventional hybrid resin composite in Class II restorations. In: Dental materials, pp 191–198
Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 27:29–38
Opdam NJM, Van De Sande FH, Bronkhorst E et al (2014) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:943–949
Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-De-Souza FH et al (2015) Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater 31:1214–1224
Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A et al (2015) Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996–2015): a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater 31:958–985
Imazato S (2003) Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 19:449–457
Imazato S, Hua CJ, Ma S et al (2012) Antibacterial resin monomers based on quaternary ammonium and their benefits in restorative dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 48:115–125
Kasraei S, Sami L, Hendi S et al (2014) Antibacterial properties of composite resins incorporating silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus. Restor Dent Endod 39:109–114. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.109
Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M et al (2011) Ultrasonically set novel NVC-containing glass-ionomer cements for applications in restorative dentistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22:2029–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4391-7
Qi YP, Li N, Niu LN et al (2012) Remineralization of artificial dentinal caries lesions by biomimetically modified mineral trioxide aggregate. Acta Biomater 8:836–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.033
Sauro S, Osorio R, Watson TF, Toledano M (2012) Therapeutic effects of novel resin bonding systems containing bioactive glasses on mineral-depleted areas within the bonded-dentine interface. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4606-6
Kokubo T (1998) Apatite formation on surfaces of ceramics, metals and polymers in body environment. Acta Mater 46:2519–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)80036-0
Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (1997) Apatite-forming ability of alkali-treated Ti metal in body environment. J Ceram Soc Jpn 105(1218):111–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sulaiman Ghandourah, B. et al. (2019). In Vitro Caries Models for the Assessment of Novel Restorative Materials. In: Papagerakis, P. (eds) Odontogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1922. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9012-2_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9012-2_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9011-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9012-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols