Summary
Data interoperability between well-defined domains is currently performed by leveraging Web services. In the biosciences, more specifically in neuroscience, robust data interoperability is more difficult to achieve due to data heterogeneity, continuous domain changes, and the constant creation of new semantic data models (Nadkarni et al., J Am Med Inform Assoc 6, 478–93, 1999; Miller et al., J Am Med Inform Assoc 8, 34–48, 2001; Gardner et al., J Am Med Inform Assoc 8, 17–33, 2001). Data heterogeneity in neurosciences is primarily due to its multidisciplinary nature. This results in a compelling need to integrate all available neuroscience information to improve our understanding of the brain. Researchers associated with neuroscience initiatives such as the human brain project (HBP) (Koslow and Huerta, Neuroinformatics: An Overview of the Human Brain Project, 1997), the Bioinformatics Research Network (BIRN), and the Neuroinformatics Information Framework (NIF) are exploring mechanisms to allow robust interoperability between these continuously evolving neuroscience databases. To accomplish this goal, it is crucial to orchestrate technologies such as database mediators, metadata repositories, semantic metadata annotations, and ontological services. This chapter introduces the importance of database interoperability in neurosciences. We also describe current data sharing and integration mechanisms in genera. We conclude with data integration in bioscience and present approaches on neuroscience data sharing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chicurel, M. (2000) Databasing the brain. Nature 406, 822–5.
Daconta, M. C., Obrst, L. J., and Smith, K. T. (2003) The Semantic Web: A Guide to the Future of XML, Web Services, and Knowledge Management, Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.
Marenco, L., Tosches, N., Crasto, C., Shepherd, G., Miller, P. L., and Nadkarni, P. M. (2003) Achieving evolvable web-database bioscience applications using the EAV/CR framework: recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(5) (abstract).
BrainML.org. Brain Markup Language. (2004) http://brainml.org. Last accessed on: June 1, 2006.
Jakobovits, R. M., Rosse, C., and Brinkley, J. F. (2002) WIRM: an open source toolkit for building biomedical web applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9, 557–70.
Pittendrigh, S., and Jacobs, G. (2003) NeuroSys: a semistructured laboratory database. Neuroinformatics 1, 167–76.
Gardner, E. Mouse Hunt. (2003) http://www.bio-itworld.com/archive/061503/mouse.html. Last accessed on: June 1, 2006.
Jepsen, T. (2001) SOAP cleans up interoperability problems on the Web. IT Professional 3(1), 52–5.
Prescod, P. Second Generation Web Services. (2002) http://webservices.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2002/02/06/rest.html. Last accessed on: April 2007.
Noy, N. F., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R. W., Knublauch, H., Tu, S. W., Vendetti, J., and Musen, M. A. (2003) Protege-2000: an open-source ontology-development and knowledge-acquisition environment. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 953.
Hass, L. M., Schwarz, P. M., Kodali, P., Kotlar, E., Rice, J. E., and Swope, W. C. (2001) DiscoveryLink: a system for integrated access to life science data sources. IBM System Journal 40, 489.
Martone, M. E., Gupta, A., and Ellisman, M. H. (2004) E-neuroscience: challenges and triumphs in integrating distributed data from molecules to brains. Nat Neurosci 7, 467–72.
Elmagarmid, A. K., Rusinkiewicz, M., and Sheth, A. (1999) Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
Kaye, D. (2003) Loosely Coupled: The Missing Pieces of Web Services, RDS Press.
Masys, D. (1992) An evaluation of the source selection elements of the prototype UMLS Information Sources Map. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, 295–8.
Andersson, O., Armstrong, P., Axelsson, H., Berjon, R., Bezaire, B., Bowler, J., Brown, C., Blultrowicz, M., and Capin, T. (2003) World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/.
Astakhov, V., Gupta, A., Santini, S., and Grethe, J. S. (2005) Data Integration in the Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN). DILS 2005, pp. 317–20.
Ludäscher, B., Gupta, A., and Martone, M. E. (2003) A model based mediator system for scientific data management. In Bioinformatics: Managing Scientific Data (Lacroix, Z., and Critchlow, T., Eds.), pp. 335–70, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Ludäscher, B., Gupta, A., and Martone, M. (2000) A Mediator System for Model-based Information Integration. Int. Conf. VLDB,
Gupta, A., Ludäscher, B., Martone, M. E., Rajasekar, A., Ross, E., Qian, X., Santini, S., He, H., and Zaslavsky, I. (2003) BIRN-M: a semantic mediator for solving real-world neuroscience problems. ACM Conf. on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (Demonstration), 678.
Ludäscher, B., Gupta, A., and Martone, M. E. (2001) Model-Based Mediation with Domain Maps. 17th Intl. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Heidelberg, Germany, IEEE Computer Society.
Hu, Z., Mellor, J., Wu, J., and DeLisi, C. (2004) VisANT: an online visualization and analysis tool for biological interaction data. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Marenco, L., Nadkarni, P., Martone, M., Gupta, A. (2007). Interoperability Across Neuroscience Databases. In: Neuroinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 401. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-520-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-520-6_2
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-720-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-520-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols