Abstract
Understanding of developmental processes relies heavily on isolation and functional characterization of relevant genes. The garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) is one of the classic model species in plant genetics and has been used for a wide range of physiological and molecular studies of plant development. Here we describe the resources and approaches available for isolation of genes and genetic characterization of loci affecting development in pea.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Franssen SU et al (2011) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of the highly complex Pisum sativum genome using next generation sequencing. BMC Genomics 12:227
Kaur S et al (2012) Transcriptome sequencing of field pea and faba bean for discovery and validation of SSR genetic markers. BMC Genomics 13:104
Rose TM et al (1998) Consensus-degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primers for amplification of distantly related sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1637–1644
Hecht V et al (2005) Conservation of Arabidopsis flowering genes in model legumes. Plant Physiol 137:1420–1434
Coyne CJ et al (2007) Construction and characterization of two bacterial artificial chromosome libraries of pea (Pisum sativum L.) for the isolation of economically important genes. Genome 50:871–875
Hofer J et al (2009) Tendril-less regulates tendril formation in pea leaves. Plant Cell 21:420–428
Bordat A et al (2011) Translational genomics in legumes allowed placing in silico 5460 unigenes on the pea functional map and identified candidate genes in Pisum sativum L. G3 (Bethesda) 1:93–103
Weller JL et al (2012) A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:21158–21163
Smykal P et al (2012) Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy 2:74–115
Deulvot C et al (2010) Highly-multiplexed SNP genotyping for genetic mapping and germplasm diversity studies in pea. BMC Genomics 11:468
Laucou V et al (1998) Genetic mapping in pea. 1. RAPD-based genetic linkage map of Pisum sativum. Theor Appl Genet 97:905–915
Gilpin BJ et al (1997) A linkage map of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) genome containing cloned sequences of known function and expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Theor Appl Genet 95: 1289–1299
McPhee KE et al (2012) Mapping QTL for Fusarium wilt race 2 partial resistance in pea (Pisum sativum). Plant Breed 131:300–306
Tar’an B et al (2003) Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 107: 1482–1491
Bourion V et al (2010) Genetic dissection of nitrogen nutrition in pea through a QTL approach of root, nodule, and shoot variability. Theor Appl Genet 121:71–86
Ellis THN et al (1992) Linkage maps in pea. Genetics 130:649–663
Lejeune-Hénaut I et al (2008) The flowering locus Hr colocalizes with a major QTL affecting winter frost tolerance in Pisum sativum L. Theor Appl Genet 116:1105–1116
Prioul S et al (2004) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in pea ( Pisum sativum L.), at the seedling and adult plant stages. Theor Appl Genet 108:1322–1334
Weeden NF et al (1998) A consensus linkage map for Pisum sativum. Pisum Genet 30:1–4
Davey JW et al (2011) Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 12: 499–510
Kilian A et al (2012) Diversity arrays technology: a generic genome profiling technology on open platforms. Methods Mol Biol 888:67–89
Sidorova KK, Shumnyi VK (2003) Creation and genetic study of a collection of symbiotic mutants of the pea (Pisum sativum L.). Genetika 39:501–509
Hecht V et al (2007) Pea LATE BLOOMER1 is a GIGANTEA ortholog with roles in photoperiodic flowering, deetiolation, and transcriptional regulation of circadian clock gene homologs. Plant Physiol 144:648–661
Platten JD et al (2005) Cryptochrome 1 contributes to blue-light sensing in pea. Plant Physiol 139:1472–1482
Weller JL, Murfet IC, Reid JB (1997) Pea mutants with reduced sensitivity to far-red light define an important role for phytochrome A in day-length detection. Plant Physiol 114: 1225–1236
Rameau C et al (1997) New ramosus mutants at loci Rms1, Rms3 and Rms4 resulting from the mutation breeding program at Versailles. Pisum Genet 29:7–12
Triques K et al (2008) Mutation detection using ENDO1: application to disease diagnostics in humans and TILLING and Eco-TILLING in plants. BMC Mol Biol 9:42
Duc G, Messager A (1989) Mutagenesis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and the isolation of mutants for nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Plant Sci 60:207–213
Borisov AY et al (1992) New symbiotic mutants of pea (Pisum sativum L.) affecting wither nodule initiation or symbiosome development. Symbiosis 14:297–313
Tsyganov VE et al (1994) New symbiotic mutants of pea obtained after mutagenesis of line SGE. Pisum Genet 26:36–37
Wang Z et al (2008) Genetic control of floral zygomorphy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10414–10419
Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Stam P (1998) Genetic analysis. Methods Mol Biol 82:105–117
Humphry M et al (2011) Durable broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in pea er1 plants is conferred by natural loss-of-function mutations in PsMLO1. Mol Plant Pathol 12: 866–878
Moreau C et al (2012) The B gene of pea encodes a defective flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase, and confers pink flower color. Plant Physiol 159:759–768
Liew LC et al (2009) DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell 21: 3198–3211
Couzigou JM et al (2012) NODULE ROOT and COCHLEATA maintain nodule development and are legume orthologs of Arabidopsis BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes. Plant Cell 24: 4498–44510
Zhuang LL et al (2012) LATHYROIDES, encoding a WUSCHEL-related Homeobox1 transcription factor, controls organ lateral growth, and regulates tendril and dorsal petal identities in garden pea Pisum sativum L.). Mol Plant 5:1333–1345
Hellens RP et al (2010) Identification of Mendel’s white flower character. PLoS One 5:e13230
Foucher F et al (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15:2742–2754
Krusell L et al (2011) The Clavata2 genes of pea and Lotus japonicus affect autoregulation of nodulation. Plant J 65:861–871
Ovchinnikova E et al (2011) IPD3 controls the formation of nitrogen-fixing symbiosomes in pea and Medicago Spp. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1333–1344
Hecht V et al (2011) The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell 23:147–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Weller, J.L., Hecht, V.F.G., Sussmilch, F.C. (2013). Isolation and Forward Genetic Analysis of Developmental Genes in Pea. In: Rose, R. (eds) Legume Genomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1069. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-613-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-613-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-612-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-613-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols