Abstract
We describe a method for detecting and validating genomic aberrations arising from cell lines exposed to zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), an important reagent used for targeted genome modifications. This method makes use of cloned cell lines, an approach that adds power when testing variables that may affect gene correction efficiency and evaluating potential side effects on a genome-wide scale. After cell treatment, the genomic DNA isolation method, as described, is ideal for high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative PCR. Guidelines for aCGH analysis and calling significant copy number variations (CNVs) for validation by qPCR are also discussed. Using this method, we describe a novel ZFN-associated chromosome 4 copy number variation (CNV) attributable to a predicted ZFN off-target cleavage site found within the CNV.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gabriel R, Lombardo A, Arens A et al (2011) An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 29(9):816–823
Feuk L, Cardon AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 7:85–97
Haraksingh RR, Abyzov A, Gerstein M et al (2011) Genome-wide mapping of copy number variation in humans: comparative analysis of high resolution array platforms. PLoS One 6(11):e27589. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027859
Urnov FD, Rebar EJ, Holmes MC et al (2010) Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 11:636–646
Tchinda J, Lee C (2006) Detecting copy number variation in the human genome using comparative genomic hybridization. Biotechniques 41(4):385–392
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25(4):402–408
Pinto D, Darvishi K, Shi X et al (2011) Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants. Nat Biotechnol 29(6):512–521
Tommasi S, Mangia A, Iannelli G et al (2010) Gene copy number variation in male breast cancer by aCGH. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 33:113–119
Bendavid C, Rochard L, Dubourg C et al (2009) Array-CGH indicates a high prevalence of genomic rearrangements in holoprosencephaly: an update map of candidate loci. Hum Mutat 30(8):1175–1182
Hanemaaijer NM, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der Vries G et al (2012) Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics. Eur J Hum Genet 20:161–165
Paulson V, Chandler G, Rakheja D et al (2011) High-resolution array CGH identifies common mechanisms that drive embryonal rahbdomyosarcoma pathogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50:397–408
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Matthew Porteus, University of Stanford, for supplying GFP-293T cells and GFP-ZFN plasmids SP202A, SP202B and PC264 donor substrate. We also thank Susanna Lewis for comments and revisions to the chapter. This work was supported by the NIH Nanomedicine Center for Nucleoprotein Machines PN2 EY018244.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Lindsay, C.R., Roth, D.B. (2014). An Unbiased Method for Detection of Genome-Wide Off-Target Effects in Cell Lines Treated with Zinc Finger Nucleases. In: Storici, F. (eds) Gene Correction. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1114. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-761-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-761-7_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-760-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-761-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols