Skip to main content

Speech Determines Quality of Life Following Total Laryngectomy: The Emperors New Voice?

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures

Abstract:

Total laryngectomy, performed for advanced laryngeal carcinoma, results in loss of the vocal chords and a permanent neck stoma. To help restore speech various voice restoration methods – tracheoesophageal speech (TEP), electrolarynx and esophageal speech – are commonly employed. Whilst different methods exist however, TEP produces the best voice quality, is assumed to maximize patient quality of life and unsurprisingly is most commonly adopted by medical and health professionals. Although voice quality is clearly of importance however, each method is associated with varied costs and benefits that impact upon other areas related to quality of life in total laryngectomy patients. Following a discussion concerning the etiology, epidemiology and treatment for laryngeal carcinoma, this chapter reviews the literature related to health-related quality of life amongst total laryngectomy patients employing different voice restoration methods. It argues that, although important, voice quality alone does not determine quality of life following total laryngectomy. Consideration should therefore be given to the impact that each voice restoration method has upon all areas of quality of life, rather than focus upon voice quality alone. Implications of these conclusions for clinical practice are discussed at the end of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,000.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

HNQOLQ:

University of Michigan head and neck quality of life questionnaire

SF-36:

health specific quality of life measure

TEP:

tracheoesphageal speech

References

  • Armstrong E, Isman K, Dooley P, Brine D, Riley N, Dentice R, King S, Khanhbai F. (2001). Head Neck. 23: 16–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jensen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, Kaasa S. (1994). EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. 33: 879–885.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blom ED. (1998). In: Blom ED, Singer M, Hamaker RC. (eds.) Trachesophageal Voice Restoration Following Total Laryngectomy. Singular, San Diego, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom ED. (2000). Oncology. 14: 915–922.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clements KS, Rassekh CH, Seikaly H, Hokanson JA, Calhoun KH. (1997). Arch Otol Head Neck Surg. 123: 493–496.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deleyiannis FW, Weymuller EA, Coltrera MD. Furtran N. (1999). Head Neck. 21: 319–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanto LW, Olsen KD, Perry WC, Rohe DE, Keith RL. (1995). Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn. 104: 763–769.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin JG, Langer CJ. (2007). Expert Rev Anticanc. 7: 331–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond S, Dancer J, Krueger K, Spring G. (1996). Percept Motor Skill. 83: 801–802.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eadie TL, Doyle PC. (2004). Laryngoscope. 114: 753–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrand P, Duncan F. (2007). Psychol Health Med. 12: 255–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer Ramírez MJ, Guallart Doménech F, Brotons Durbán S, Carrasco Llatas M, Estellés Ferriol E, López Martínez R. (2001). Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 258: 463–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finizia MD, Bergman B. (2001). Laryngoscope. 111: 918–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finizia C, Hammerlid E, Westin T, Lindström J. (1998a). Laryngoscope. 108: 1566–1573.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finizia C, Lindström J, Dotevall H. (1998b). Laryngoscope. 108: 138–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forastiere AA, Trotti A, Pfister DG, Grandis JR. (2006). J Clin Oncol. 24: 2603–2605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk GF, Karnell LH, Christensen AJ, Moran PJ, Ricks J. (2003). Head Neck. 25: 561–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FT, O’Brien CJ, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, Bron L, Jackson MA. (2003). ANZ J Surg. 73: 300–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood AR, Rawlinson E. (1983). Int J Radiat Oncol. 9: 335–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz J, Sarandeses A, Fernández MF, Barro CV, Vidal JM, Gavilán J. (2000). Otolaryng Head Neck. 122: 892–898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH, Aaronson NK, Schouwenburg PF, Van Zandwijk N. (1990). Clin Otolaryngol. 15: 421–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH, Cooper JS, Weber RS, Langer CJ, Ang KK, Gay G, Stewart A, Robinson R. (2006). Laryngoscope. 116 (Suppl. 2): 1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janse AJ, Gemke RJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, Tweel I, van der Kimpen JL, Sinnema G. (2004). J Clin Epidemiol. 57: 653–661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. (1993). British Med J. 306: 1437–1440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • List MA, D’Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D, Vokes E. (1996a). Cancer. 77: 2294–2301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • List MA, Ritter-Sterr CA, Baker TM, Colangelo LA, Matz G, Roa Pauloski B, Logemann JA. (1996b). Head Neck. 18: 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LoTempio MM, Wang KH, Sadeghi A, Delacure MD, Juillard GF, Wang MB. (2005). Otolaryng Head Neck. 132: 948–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marioni G, Marchese-Ragona R, Giuseppe Cartei G, Fortunata Marchese F, Staffieri A. (2006). Cancer Treat Rev. 32: 504–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. (1981). New Engl J Med. 305: 982–987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohide EA, Archibald SD, Tew M, Young JE. (1992). Am J Surg. 14: 619–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris HL, Smith AE, Van Demark DR, Maves MD. (1992). Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn. 101: 503–510.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morton RP, Witterick IJ. (1995). Am J Otolaryngol. 16: 284–293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2007). Cancer Registration Statistics 2004. The Stationary Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto RA, Dobie RA, Lawrence V, Sakai C. (1997). Ann Oto Rhinol Laryn. 106: 693–699.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paydarfar JA, Birkmeyer NJ. (2006). Arch Otolaryngol. 132: 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillon J, Gonçalves MIR, De Biase NG. (2004). Sao Paulo Med J. 122: 195–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pou AM. (2004). Otolaryng Clin N Am. 37: 507–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM, Cano S, Davidge K, Klassen A, Branski R, Patel S, Kraus D, Cordeiro PG. (2007). Otolaryng Head Neck.136: 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg-Berlin B, Möller RY, Finizia C. (2007). Arch Otolaryngol. 133: 650–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins J, Fisher HB, Blom EC, Singer MI. (1984). J Speech Hear Disord. 49: 202–210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SN, Lowe D, Brown JS. (1999). Head Neck. 21: 394–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster M, Toy H, Lohscheller J, Eysholdt U, Rosanowski F. (2003). Folia Phoniatr Logo. 55: 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkiewicz A, Winiarski P, Mackiewicz H, Owczarzak H, Janicka-Beutch L, Betlejewski S. (2006). Otolaryngol Pol. 60: 33–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart MG, Chen AY, Stach CB. (1998). Arch Otolaryngol. 124: 143–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JC, Terrell JE, Ronis DL, Fowler KE, Bishop C, Lambert MT, Myers LL, Duffy SA. (2004). The University of Michigan Head and Neck Cancer Team. Arch Otolaryngol. 130: 764–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell JE, Fisher SG, Wolf MD. (1998). Arch Otolaryngol. 124: 964–971.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell JE, Nanavati KA, Esclamado RM, Bishop JK, Bradford CR, Wolf GT. (1997). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 123: 1125–1132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward EC, Bishop B, Frisby J, Stevens M. (2002). Arch Otolaryngol. 128: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SE, Watson JB. (1987). Laryngoscope. 97: 737–739.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Farrand, P., Endacott, R. (2010). Speech Determines Quality of Life Following Total Laryngectomy: The Emperors New Voice?. In: Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R. (eds) Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_117

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_117

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-78664-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78665-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics