Abstract
Most practitioners of archaeoastronomy would argue that paying due attention to social theory and the broader cultural context does not obviate the need for careful attention to be given to methodological considerations such as the fair selection of data. Notwithstanding the complexities and subtleties that can arise when archaeoastronomical evidence is duly considered in a broader context, this chapter addresses a number of basic issues of best practice, with data selection methodologies at the fore. It focuses particularly upon three types of evidence most commonly considered by archaeoastronomers – structural orientations, light-and-shadow effects, and symbol counts – as identified in Chap. 24, “Nature and Analysis of Material Evidence Relevant to Archaeoastronomy”. It does not address field survey and data analysis techniques as such; these are covered in Chaps. 26, “Techniques of Field Survey” and 27, “Analyzing Orientations”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson RJC (1966) Moonshine on stonehenge. Antiquity 40:212–216
Aveni AF (1988) The Thom paradigm in the Americas: the case of the cross-circle designs. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Records in stone: papers in memory of Alexander Thom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 442–472
Aveni AF (ed) (2008) Foundations of new world cultural astronomy: a reader with commentary. University Press of Colorado, Boulder
Aveni AF, Hartung H, Buckingham B (1978) The pecked cross symbol in ancient America. Science 202:267–279
Boutsikas E, Ruggles CLN (2011) Temples, stars, and ritual landscapes: the potential for archaeoastronomy in ancient Greece. Am J Archaeol 115(1):55–68
Bradley RJ (2009) An archaeology of natural places. Routledge, London
Brennan M (1980) The Boyne Valley vision. Dolmen Press, Portlaoise
Carlson JB (1987) Romancing the stone, or moonshine on the sun dagger. In: Carlson JB, Judge WJ (eds) Astronomy and ceremony in the prehistoric Southwest. Papers of the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, no. 2. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Albuquerque, pp 71–88
Cotte M, Ruggles CLN (2010) Astronomical heritage in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: developing a professional and rational approach. In: Ruggles CLN, Cotte M (eds) Heritage sites of astronomy and archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: a thematic study. ICOMOS–IAU, Paris, pp 261–273
Edwards ER, Belmonte JA (2004) Megalithic astronomy of Easter Island: a reassessment. J Hist Astron 35:421–433
Freeman PR (1982) The statistical approach. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the old world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–52
Hadingham E (1981) The lunar observatory hypothesis at Carnac: a reconsideration. Antiquity 45:35–42
Hawkins GS, White JB (1965) Stonehenge decoded. Doubleday, New York
Heggie DC (1981) Megalithic science: ancient mathematics and astronomy in northwest Europe. Thames and Hudson, London
Heggie DC (1982) Megalithic astronomy: highlights and visions. In: Heggie DC (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the old world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–24
Hoskinson T (2005) Calendric investigations of a complex petroglyph panel at a Gila River archaeological site in Arizona. In: Fountain JW, Sinclair RM (eds) Current studies in archaeoastronomy: conversations across time and space. Carolina Academic Press, Durham, pp 169–179
Hutton R (1991) The pagan religions of the ancient British Isles. Blackwell, Oxford
Kintigh KW (1992) I wasn’t going to say anything, but since you asked: archaeoastronomy and archaeology. Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy News 5(1):1&4
Kirch PV, Ruggles CLN (n.d.) Heiau sites of Kahikinui and Kaupō (manuscript in preparation)
Lockyer JN (1909) Stonehenge and other British stone monuments astronomically considered, 2nd edn. Macmillan, London
Malville JM (2011) Astronomy and ceremony at Chankillo: an Andean perspective. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 154–161
Penrose FC (1893) On the results of an examination of the orientations of a number of Greek temples with a view to connect these angles with the amplitudes of certain stars at the time the temples were founded, and an endeavour to derive therefrom the dates of their foundation by consideration of the changes produced upon the right ascension and declination of the stars by the precession of the equinoxes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A184:805–834
Pereira QG (2011) La Horca del Inca – an astronomical observatory? In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 128–134
Petrie WMF (1883) The pyramids and temples of Gizeh. Field and Tuer, London
Ruggles CLN (1981) A critical examination of the megalithic lunar observatories. In: Ruggles CLN, Whittle AWR (eds) Astronomy and society in Britain during the period 4000–1500 BC, BAR British Series 88. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, pp 153–209
Ruggles CLN (1982) A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 1: backsights, indicators and the archaeological status of the sightlines. Archaeoastronomy 4(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 13):S21–S40
Ruggles CLN (1983) A reassessment of the high precision megalithic lunar sightlines, 2: foresights and the problem of selection. Archaeoastronomy 5(Supplement to the Journal for the History for Astronomy 14):S1–S36
Ruggles CLN (1999) Astronomy in prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Yale University Press, New Haven
Ruggles CLN (2005) Ancient astronomy: an encyclopedia of cosmologies and myth. ABC–CLIO, Santa Barbara
Ruggles CLN (2007) Cosmology, calendar, and temple orientations in ancient Hawai’i. In: Ruggles CLN, Urton G (eds) Skywatching in the ancient world: new perspectives in cultural astronomy. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 287–329
Ruggles CLN (2011) Pushing back the frontiers or still running around the same circles? ‘Interpretative archaeoastronomy’ thirty years on. In: Ruggles CLN (ed) Archaeoastronomy and ethnoastronomy: building bridges between cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–18
Ruggles CLN, Saunders NJ (1993) The study of cultural astronomy. In: Ruggles CLN, Saunders NJ (eds) Astronomies and cultures. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, pp 1–31
Schaefer BE (2006) Case studies of three of the most famous claimed archaeoastronomical alignments in North America. In: Bostwick TW, Bates B (eds) Viewing the sky through past and present cultures. Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers, No 15. City of Phoenix, Phoenix, pp 27–56
Sofaer A, Zinser V, Sinclair RM (1979) A unique solar marking construct. Science 206:283–285
Sofaer A, Sinclair RM, Doggett LE (1982) Lunar markings on Fajada Butte, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. In: Aveni AF (ed) Archaeoastronomy in the new world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–181
Sofaer A, Price A, Holmlund J, Nicoli J, Piscitello A (2011) The Sun Dagger interactive computer graphics model: a digital restoration of a Chacoan calendrical site. In: Walker WH, Venzor KR (eds) Contemporary archaeologies of the Southwest. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, pp 67–92
Soper R (1982) Archaeo-astronomical Cushites: some comments. Azania 17:145–162
Thom A (1971) Megalithic lunar observatories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Thom A, Thom AS (1978) Megalithic remains in Britain and Brittany. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Towrie S (2013) Orkneyjar: the Crantit Cairn, St Ola. http://www.orkneyjar.com/history/tombs/crantit/crantit3.htm. Accessed 2 Apr 2013
Urton G (2001) A calendrical and demographic tomb text from northern Peru. Latin American Antiquity 12(2):127–147
Urton G, Brezine C (2009) Khipu database project. http://khipukamayuq.fas.harvard.edu/. Accessed 2 Apr 2013
Williamson T, Bellamy L (1983) Ley lines in question. World’s Work, Tadworth
Zeilik M (1985a) The ethnoastronomy of the historic Pueblos, I: calendrical sun watching. Archaeoastronomy 8(Supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16):S1–S24
Zeilik M (1985b) A reassessment of the Fajada Butte solar marker. Archaeoastronomy 9(supplement to the Journal for the History of Astronomy, 16):S69–S85
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ruggles, C.L.N. (2015). Best Practice for Evaluating the Astronomical Significance of Archaeological Sites. In: Ruggles, C. (eds) Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6140-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6141-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics