Introduction
The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the context of writing is increasingly natural, and as a result, this interaction has caused changes in the nature and contexts of communicational processes (interpersonal, virtual, digital, and textual). This use of ICT has also changed the writing process making it more diverse and integrating with new writing formats (e.g., linear, multimodal), which may occur in different contexts (e.g., synchronous or asynchronous, individual, collective, or collaborative), and enforces the integration of digital literacy by the school (Lacina and Griffith 2012).
The integration of technologies in the classroom context is a necessity and a potential for the learning processes involving several teachers and students, with different characteristics, knowledge, and experiences. Although...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akbiyik C, Seferoglu SS (2012) Instructing ICT lessons in primary schools: teachers’ opinions and applications. Educ Sci: Theory Pract 12(1):417–424
Anderson L, Krathwohl DA (2001) Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education Group, Boston
Araújo CL (2017) Dificuldades de Aprendizagens Específicas na escrita de textos argumentativos de opinião: O papel das estratégias de autorregulação no contexto das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação. Dissertação de Doutoramento em Estudos da Criança – área de Educação Especial, Universidade do Minho, Braga. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1822/48602
Berninger VW, Nagy W, Tanomoto S, Thompson R Abbott R (2015) Computer Instruction in Handwriting, Spelling, and Composing for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Grades 4 to 9. Computers & Education 81:154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.005
Boyle JR, Forchelli GA, Cariss K (2015) Note-taking interventions to assist students with disabilities in content area classes. Prev Sch Fail 59(3):186–195
Buckingham D (2007) Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the internet. Res Comp Int Educ 2(1):43–55
CAST (2011) Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines
Cope B, Kalantzis M (2000) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. Macmillan, Melbourne
Cruz V (2009) Dificuldades de Aprendizagem Específicas. Lidel, Lisboa
Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Culter L, Graham S (2008) Primary grade writing instruction: a national survey. J Educ Psychol 100:907–919
De Smedt F, Van Keer H (2014) A research synthesis on effective writing instruction in primary education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 112:693–701. Presented at the international conference on education and educational psychology (ICEEPSY)
Flewitt R, Flewitt R, Messer D, Kucirkova N (2014) New directions for early literacy in a digital age: the iPad. J Early Child Lit 15(3):289–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798414533560
Fuchs D, Fuchs L, Vaughn S (2008) Response to intervention: a framework for reading educators. International Reading Association, Newark
Graham CR (2011) Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Comput Educ 57:1953–1960
Graham S, Hall TE (2016) Writing and writing difficulties from primary grades to college: introduction to the special issue. Learn Disabil Q 39(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715592154
Graham S, Harris KR (2013) Designing an effective writing program. In: Graham S, MacArthur C, Fitzgerald J (eds) Best practices in writing instruction. Guilford, New York, pp 3–25
Graham S, McKeown D, Kiuhara S, Harris KR (2012) A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. J Educ Psychol 104(4):879–896
Harris KR, Graham S, Mason LH, Friedlander B (2008) Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brookes, Baltimore
Hattie J (2009) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, Abingdon
Kellogg RT (2008) Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective. J Writ Res 1(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Lacina J, Griffith R (2012) Blogging as a means of crafting writing. Read Teach 66(4):316–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01128
MacArthur CA (2009) Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learn Disabil Res Pract 24(2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x
Morphy P, Graham S (2012) Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings. Read Writ Interdiscip J 25(3):641–678
Peterson SS, McClay JK (2012) Assumptions and practices in using digital technologies to teach writing in middle-level classrooms across Canada. Literacy 46:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00665.x
Peterson-Karlan GR (2011) Technology to support writing by students with learning and academic disabilities: recent research trends and findings. Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits 7(1):39–62. ISSN: ISSN-1938-727X
Rose D, Meyer A (2002) Teaching every student in the digital age: universal design for learning. ASCD, Alexandria
Tavares CF, Barbeiro LF (2011) As Implicações das TIC no Ensino da Língua. Ministério da Educação: Direcção-Geral de Inovação e de Desenvolvimento Curricular, Lisboa
Thompson R, Tanimoto S, Abbott R, Nielsen K, Lyman RD, Geselowitz K, … Berninger V (2016) Relationships between language input and letter output modes in writing notes and summaries for students in grades 4 to 9 with persisting writing disabilities. Assist Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1199066
Troia GA, Shankland RK, Wolbers KA (2012) Motivation research in writing: theoretical and empirical considerations. Read Writ Q 28:5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632729
Wolf B, Berninger V, Abbott R (2016) Effective beginning handwriting instruction: multimodal, consistent format for 2 years, and linked to spelling and composing. Read Writ 30:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9674-4
Virginia W. Berninger, William Nagy, Steve Tanimoto, Rob Thompson, Robert D. Abbott, (2015) Computer instruction in handwriting, spelling, and composing for students with specific learning disabilities in grades 4–9. Computers & Education 81:154-168
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by a PhD Grant SFRH/BD/86175/2012, which was awarded to Araújo, C.L. by the Technology and Science Foundation (FCT), Portugal, and developed at the Research Center in Education of Institute of Education – University of Minho (Portugal).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Araújo, C.L., Osório, A.J., Martins, A.P.L. (2020). Exploratory Study Using Self-Regulated Self-Development (SRSD) and Technology in the Context of the Classroom. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_230
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_230
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10575-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10576-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceReference Module Computer Science and Engineering