Skip to main content

Personal Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education
  • 67 Accesses

Definition

Personal social responsibility is generally referred to individuals who have moral responsiblity for their moral actions and to behave as good members of society (Crane and Matten 2016; Gray et al. 2014).

Introduction of Personal Social Responsibility

The notion of personal social responsibility has been widely discussed and has not provided the simple answer. In order to understand personal social responsibility, individuals try to understand what it is to be human beings and how individuals to behave as good members of society (Gray et al. 2014). There is the subtle and implicit relationship between morality and responsibility. Individuals are responsible for their moral actions, while individuals articulate their responsibilities for themselves.

In particular, morality tends to seek right and wrong solutions in the society and individuals will often rely on two main ethical positions: (1) ethical absolutism that is universally applicable moral principles and (2) ethical...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan J (2004) The corporation: the pathological pursuit of profit and power. Constable and Robinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (1997) Ethical theory and business, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Becht M, Franks J, Mayer C, Rossi S (2009) Returns to shareholder activism: evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Rev Financ Stud 22:3093–3129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield M, Murray A (2014) Corporate responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Buchholtz AK (2009) Business and Society: ethics and stakeholder management, 7th edn. South-Western Cengage Learning, Manson

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Shabana (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

  • Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: the influence of executives values on corporate social responsibility. Adm Sci Q 58(2): 197–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssides GD, Kaler JH (2005) An introduction to business ethics. Thomson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (International Edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis K (1973) The case for and against business assumption of social responsibility. Acad Manag J June:312–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimson E, KarakaÅŸ O, Li X (2015) Active ownership. Rev Financ Stud 28(12):3225–3268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston L (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In: Chryssides GD, Kaler JH (eds) An introduction to business ethics. Thomson, London, pp 249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a difference voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond JP, Kang N, Moon J (2011) The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Econ Soc 40(4):640–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Adams CA, Owen D (2014) Accountability, social responsibility and sustainability: accounting for society and the environment. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson A (2000) Making sense of postmodern business ethics. Bus Ethics Q 10(2):645–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1983) Diskursethik – Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm. In: Habermas J (ed) Moralbewußstein und kommunikatives Handeln. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M., pp 53–125. (Engl.: Habermas J: 1992, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. by Lenhardt Ch. and Nicholsen S. W. (Polity Press, Cambridge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1991) Ethical decision marking by individuals in organization: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manag Rev 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant E (1975/1996) The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani A (2010) The case against corporate social responsibility. Wall Street J 23:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz DA, McIntosh LA (2015) Corporate governance update: engagement and activism in the 2015 proxy season. N Y Law J January:29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurucz EC, Colbert BA, Wheeler D (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung TCH (2015) An initial exploration of corporate social disclosure and responsible gambling disclosure in Macau’s gambling industry. In: Noronha C (ed) Corporate social disclosure: new observations in China and Japan. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 153–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leung TCH, Gray R (2016) Social responsibility disclosure in the international gambling industry: a research note. Meditari Account Res 24(1):73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung TCH, Snell RS (2017) Attraction or distraction? Corporate social responsibility in Macao’s gambling industry. J Bus Ethics 145(3):637–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1984) After virtue: a study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier M (1997) Gender equity, organizational transformation and challenger. J Bus Ethics 16:943–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni MJ, Brown ME (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. J Bus Ethics 68:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ES (2004) Children and the changing world of advertising. J Bus Ethics 52(2):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noronha C, Leung TCH, Lei O (2015) Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Chinese railway companies: corporate response after a major train accident. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 6(4):446–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Rourke A (2003) A new politics of engagement: shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Bus Strateg Environ 12(4):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev December:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabouin M (1997) Lyin’T(*)gers, and ‘Cares’, oh my: the case of feminist integration of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 16:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. The Dewey essay in philosophy, vol 4. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal SB, Buchholz RA (2000) Rethinking business ethics: a pragmatic approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims RR, Brinkmann J (2002) Leaders as moral role models: the case of John Gutfreund at Salomon brothers. J Bus Ethics 35(4):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann H, Löhr A (1994) Grundlagen der Unternehmensethik. Schäffer-Posechel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R (2000) How new is socially responsible investment? Bus Ethics 9(3):174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño LK, Nelson KA (2014) Managing business ethics: straight talk about how to do it right, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany C. H. Leung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Leung, T.C.H. (2019). Personal Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_272

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics