Abstract
A trope is the transfer of a word from its usual meaning to a different one, justified by a relation of similitude, or of another kind, between the two meanings. Early modern students of grammar and rhetoric memorized the tropes and learned how to identify and use each of them through the use of widely reprinted ancient and contemporary manuals of rhetoric, as well as publications dealing exclusively with tropes, such as those by Despauterius, Mosellanus and Susenbrotus. In practical terms, tropes stood out as crucial ingredients of the ornament of style, and as such they were central to the way literate individuals would speak and, especially, write. Furthermore, from a theoretical standpoint, tropes were a catalyst for crucial developments in early modern linguistic and aesthetic thought. On the one hand, they provided a window to the mechanisms through which language works, opening as they did a distinction between literal and figurative meaning. On the other, tropes (and especially metaphor) attracted great attention as the locus of coalescence between cognition and pleasure and became, therefore, touchstones for the development of a theory of the beautiful.
References
Primary Literature
Camillo Delminio, Giulio. 1970–1974. Topica. In Trattati di poetica e retorica del Cinquecento, vol. 1, ed. Bernard Weinberg, 357–407. Bari: Laterza.
Despauterius, Johannes. 1528. De figuris liber, ex Quintiliano, Donato, Diomede, Valla Placentino, Mancinello, Nigro, pluribusque diligenter concinnatus. Lyon: Laurent Hylaire (1st ed. 1512).
Erasmus of Rotterdam, Desiderius. 1512. De duplici copia rerum ac verborum commentarii duo. Paris: Josse Bade.
Melanchthon, Philip. 1521. Institutiones rhetoricae. Wittenberg: Thomas Anshelm.
Mosellanus (Schade, Peter). 1516. Tabulae de schematibus et tropis. Frankfurt: Streckenbach.
Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1572. Piena, et larga parafrase… nel terzo libro della retorica d’Aristotele, a Theodette. Venice: Giovanni Varisco & Compagni.
Susenbrotus, Johannes. 1562. Epitome troporum ac schematum. Zurich: Cristoph Froschauer. (1st ed. 1540).
Secondary Literature
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2007. Metaphor and the logicians from Aristotle to Cajetan. Vivarium 45 (2–3): 311–327.
Cummings, Brian. 2007. Metalepsis: The boundaries of metaphor. In Renaissance figures of speech, ed. S. Adamson, G. Alexander, and K. Ettenhuber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, Lawrence D. 1997. Aristotle’s rhetoric made methodical. In Autour de Ramus: Texte, théorie, commentaire, ed. K. Merhood and J.-C. Moisan, 135–173. Quebec: Nuits Blanches.
Green, Lawrence D. 1999. Grammatica movet. In Rhetorica movet: Studies in honour of H. F. Plett, ed. P. Osterreich and T. Sloane, 81–104. Leiden: Brill.
Green, Lawrence D., and James Jerome Murphy. 2006. Renaissance rhetoric: Short-title catalogue, 1460–1700. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1998. Handbook of literary rhetoric: A foundation for literary study. Trans. Matthew T. Bliss, Annemiek Jansen, and David E. Orton. Edited by David E. Orton, and R. Dean Anderson. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Mack, Peter. 2011. A history of renaissance rhetoric, 1380–1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Patino Loira, J. (2018). Tropes in Renaissance Rhetoric. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1084-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1084-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities