Skip to main content

Will, Bondage Of

Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

The phrase “bondage of the will” was coined by Martin Luther in his debate with Erasmus of Rotterdam in 1525. Luther’s elaboration of the phrase is theological rather than philosophical, elucidating his basic conviction of justification by faith. Later Lutheran teaching on the will affirms its qualified freedom in human affairs and denies the will’s ability to contribute to salvation. Anglican and Reformed confessional texts teach in a similar fashion. John Calvin takes over Luther’s view of bondage and develops it into a systematic topic that is related to Calvin’s overall view of divine election and predestination. The Canons of Dort affirm Calvin’s doctrine in a strict manner. While Calvinism and Molinism evaluate human bondage differently, both early modern currents interact insofar as they develop complex philosophical theologies that affirm both divine foreknowledge and human responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Augsburg confession (1530). In The book of concord, ed. T. Wengert and R. Kolb. Minneapolis 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, J. 2006, orig. 1559. Institutes of the Christian religion. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canons of Dort (1619). In Müller 1999, 843–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther, M. 1525. De servo arbitrio, vol. 18 in his Werke (WA). Weimar et al. 1883–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, E.F.K. ed. 1999. Die Bekenntnisschriften der reformierten Kirche. Waltrop: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirty-nine articles (1562). In Müller 1999, 505–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westminster confession (1647). In Müller 1999, 542–612.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Kolb, R. 2005. Bound choice, election, and Wittenberg theological method. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, R. 2006. Post-reformation reformed dogmatics: vol. 3: The divine essence and attributes. Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisula, T. 2012. Augustine and the functions of concupiscence. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T. and G. Wenz. eds. 2000. Gerecht und Sünder zugleich? Ökumenische Klärungen. Freiburg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, M. 2012. The problem of evil. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risto Saarinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Saarinen, R. (2016). Will, Bondage Of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_211-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_211-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Will in Renaissance Philosophy, Bondage of
    Published:
    17 October 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_211-3

  2. Will, Bondage Of
    Published:
    23 May 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_211-2

  3. Original

    Will, Bondage Of
    Published:
    14 June 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_211-1