Abstract
Access to environment-friendly technologies is the key to enable the implementation of the newly adopted Sustainable Development Goals and especially goal number seven to “ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all.” It remains an issue that the transfer of such technologies is highly politicized. This analysis wants to explore the applicability of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Theory to the global concern of sustainable development and especially to the quest for energy access. We would like to look for potential avenues to better understand the innovative momentum of ongoing global change and implications for quality of democracy by looking at the potential of information and communication technology (ICT) in making environmentally sound technologies even more viable solutions for energy transition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdel-Latif, A. (2015). Intellectual property rights and the transfer of climate change technologies: Issues, challenges, and way forward. Climate Policy, 15(1), 103–126.
Andrade, J. C. S., & de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2015). The role of the private sector in global climate and energy governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2235-3.
Berdequé, J. A. (2005). Pro-poor innovation systems. Background paper. Rome: IFAD.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analyis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.
BNEF/Lighting Global. (2016). Off-grid solar market trends report 2016.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1997). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm#transmittal
Campbell, D. F. J. (1994). European nation-state under pressure: National fragmentation or the evolution of suprastate structures? Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 25(6), 879–909. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g770888219
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2012). Lineare und nicht-lineare knowledge production: Innovative Herausforderungen für das Hochschulsystem. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 7(2), 64–72. http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/448
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013a). Epistemic governance in higher education. Quality enhancement of universities for development (SpringerBriefs in Business). New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/organization/book/978-1-4614-4417-6
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2013b). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy, 697–702. In Carayannis, E. G. (Editor-in-Chief), Dubina, I. N., Seel, N., Campbell D. F. J., Uzunidis, D. (Associate Editors), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_271
Campbell, D. F. J., & Carayannis, E. G. (2016). Epistemic governance and epistemic innovation policy. Technology, Innovation and Education 2(2), 1–15. http://technology-innovation-education.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40660-016-0008-2
Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: The USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 6(3), 467–493. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46(3/4), 201–234. http://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticletoc.php?jcode=ijtm&year=2009&vol=46&issue=3/4, http://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticle.php?artid=23374
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1(1), 41–69. http://www.igi-global.com/article/triple-helix-quadruple-helix-quintuple/41959
Carayannis, E.G., & Kaloudis, A. J. (2010). A time for action and a time to lead: democratic capitalism and a new “New Deal” for the US and the world in the Twenty-first century. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-009-0002-y.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development (SpringerBriefs in Business). New York: Springer. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9781461420613
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2017). The Quadruple Helix innovation systems conceptual framework, 1–7. In De Oliveira Monteiro, S. P., Carayannis E. G. (Eds.), The quadruple innovation helix nexus. A smart growth model, quantitative empirical validation and operationalization for OECD countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9_1
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12. https://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 3 (12), 1–23. http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/3/1/12
Casaramona, A., Sapia, A., & Soraci, A. (2015). How TOI and the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation system can support the development of a new model of international cooperation. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 6, 505–521.
Danilda, I., Lindberg, M., & Torstensson, B-M. (2009). Women resource centres: A quattro helix innovation system on the European agenda, Paper. http://www.hss09.se/own_documents/Papers/3-11%20-%20Danilda%20Lindberg%20&%20Torstensson%20-%20paper.pdf
De Coninck, H., & Puig, D. (2014). Assessing climate change mitigation technology interventions by international institutions. Climatic Change, 131(3), 417–433.
Diecker, J., Wheeldon, S., & Scott, A. (2016): Accelerating access to electricity in Africa with off-grid solar: Policies to expand the market for solar household solutions, Report. Overseas Development Institute (ODI). https://www.odi.org/publications/10200-accelerating-access-electricity-africa-off-grid-solar
Dubash, N. K., & Florini, A. (2011). Mapping global energy governance. Global Policy, 2(special issue), 6–18.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
European Commission. (2009). The world in 2025: Rising Asia and socio-ecological transition. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/the-world-in-2025-report_en.pdf
Fischer-Kowalski, M, Haberl, H. (Eds.) (2007). Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Florini, A., & Dubash, N. K. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Governing energy in a fragmented world. Global Policy, 2(special issue), 1–5.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Goldthau, A. (Ed.). (2013). The handbook of global energy policy. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
GSMA. (2016a). Unlocking access to utility services: The transformational value of mobile. Mobile for development utilities annual report. http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/programmes/m4dutilities/annual-report
GSMA. (2016b). Mobile for development utilities. PEG Ghana: Licensing Solar-as-a-Service in a New Market. http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/programme/m4dutilities/peg-ghana-licensing-solar-as-a-service-in-a-new-market
Gujba, H., Thorne, S., Mulugetta, Y., Rai, K., & Youba, S. (2012). Financing low carbon energy access in Africa. Energy Policy, 47(2012), 71–78.
Hanna, N. K. (2010). E-transformation: Enabling new development strategies. New York: Springer.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Haselip, J., Elmer Hansen, U., Puig, D., Trærup, S., & Subash, D. (2015). Governance, enabling frameworks and policies for the transfer and diffusion of low carbon and climate adaptation technologies in developing countries. Climatic Change, 131(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1440-0.
Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2004). Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
IEA. (2012). World energy outlook 2012. OECD/IEA. Paris.
Internet Society (2016). Global Internet Report 2015: Mobile evolution and development of the internet. http://www.internetsociety.org/globalinternetreport/#main-content
Lakamp, B (2017). Energy is the new Internet. Crunch Network. https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/22/energy-is-the-new-new-internet/?ncid=rss&utm_s
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1), 25–35. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
McHenry, M. P., & Doepel, D. (2015). The “low power” revolution: Rural off-grid consumer technologies and portable micropower systems in non-industrialised regions. Renewable Energy, 78(2015), 679–684.
De Oliveira Monteiro, S. P., & Carayannis E. G. (2017). The quadruple innovation helix nexus: A smart growth model, quantitative empirical validation and operationalization for OECD countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.palgrave.com/br/book/9781137555762
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2006). Re-thinking science: Mode 2 in societal context, 39–51. In E. G. Carayannis & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger.
Oueraogo, B. I., Kouame, S., Azoumah, Y., & Yamegueu, D. (2015). Incentives for rural off grid electrification in Burkina Faso using LCOE. Renewable Energy, 78(2015), 573–582.
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2014). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millenium, 43(2), 684–705.
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. Ambio, 2016(45), 42–51.
Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1, 54–74. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/polanyi_1967.pdf, http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~gsd/595e/docs/41.%20Polanyi_Republic_of_Science.pdf
Pueyo, A. & Linares, P. (2012). Renewable technology transfer to developing countries: One size does not fit all. IDS working paper 412. http://www.ids.ac.uk/publication/renewable-technology-transfer-to-developing-countries-one-size-does-not-fit-all
Rosenau, J. N. (1997). Along the domestic-foreign frontier: exploring governance in a turbulent world, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
SE4ALL. (2014). 2014 annual report. http://www.se4all.org/content/se4all-2014-annual-report
Shugurova, I. V. & Shugurov, M. V. (2015). International technology transfer – Controversial global policy issues. Environmental Policy and Law, 45(3), 133–139.
Stamm, A., Figueroa, A., & Scordato, L. (2012). Addressing global challenges through collaboration in science, technology and innovation. In OECD, meeting global challenges through better governance: International co-operation in science technology and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
UN. (2015). General Assembly Resolution 70/1, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1 (21 October 2015). Available from Paris http://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1
Valente, M. (2010). Public and private partnerships for sustainable development in Africa: A process framework. Journal of African Business, 11(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228911003608538.
Van de Graaf, T. & Colgan, J. (2016). Global energy governance: A review and research agenda. Palgrave Communications 2, Article number: 15047 (2016). http://www.palgrave-journals.com/articles/palcomms201547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Galan, M., Campbell, D.F.J., Carayannis, E.G. (2018). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Governance of Energy Access: Exploring Application of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Theory in Technology Transfer. In: Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds) Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09068-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09069-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences