Skip to main content

Abstract

Where manned spaceflight was once an endeavor concentrated primarily on complex feats of engineering, psychosocial factors are becoming of increasing importance in mission planning. Planned future missions are increasing in scope, duration, and complexity as governmental space agencies and private ventures alike have set their sights on suborbital flight, space tourism, lunar missions, asteroid mining, Mars habitats, near-Earth objects and increasingly-distant locales. This chapter discusses the psychological challenges of the spaceflight environment, relevant lessons learned from other extreme environments, and current approaches toward optimizing crew selection and performance, culminating with a discussion of considerations for the future of psychological health in manned spaceflight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atonovsky AA (1987) Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel RB, Berning A (1991) The third-quarter phenomenon: do people experience discomfort after stress has passed? In: Harrison AA, Clearwater YA, McKay CP (eds) From Antarctica to outer space: life in isolation and confinement. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop SL (2006) Psychological and psychosocial health and well-being at Pole Station. In: Cockell CS (ed) Project Boreas: a station for the Martian Geographic North Pole. British Interplanetary Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brcic J (2013) Extreme teams: coping and motive imagery of small, mission oriented teams in extreme and unusual environments. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AE (1985) Multi-cultural dynamics in space stations. Paper presented at the 36th international astronautical congress, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement G (2005) Fundamentals of space medicine. Microcosm Press and Springer, El Segundo

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas-Diaz L, Luthar SS, Maddi SR, O’Neill KH, Saakvitne KW, Tedeschi RG (2018) The road to resilience. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Space Biology and Medicine (1998) A strategy for research in space biology and medicine in the next century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors MM, Harrison AA, Akins FR (1985) Living aloft: human spaceflight requirements for extended spaceflight. NASA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR (1991) NEO five-factor inventory. Psychological assessment resources, Lutz

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion KL (2004) Interpersonal and group processes in long-term spaceflight crews: perspectives from social and organizational psychology. Aviat Space Environ Med 75:C39

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans CR, Dion KL (1991) Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Res 22:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser TM (1968) Leisure and recreation in long duration space missions. Hum Factors 10:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman JL (1975) Crowding and behaviour. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson EKE (1973) Human adaptability to Antarctic conditions. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson EKE, Nelson PD (1963) Adaptation of small groups to extreme environments. Aerosp Med 34:1111–1115

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison AA (2001) Spacefaring: the human dimension. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N (1985) Psychological factors affecting simulated and actual space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 56:806–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N (1987) Psychological and interpersonal issues in space. Am J Psychiatr 144:703–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N (2015) Humans in space: the psychological hurdles. Springer, San Francisco

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kring JP (2001) Multicultural factors for international spaceflight. Hum Perf Extrem Environ 5:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedev V (1988) Diary of a cosmonaut: 211 days in space. Phytoresource Research Information Service, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden TJ, Helmreich R, Rose RM, Fogg LF (1994) Predicting astronaut effectiveness: a multivariate approach. Aviat Space Environ Med 65:904

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PD (1964) Similarities and differences among leaders and followers. J Soc Psychol 63:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg JE (1981) Red star in orbit. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas LA (1986) Health and performance of antarctic winter-over personnel: A follow-up study. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:954–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas LA (2007) Psychosocial issues in long-term space flight: overview. Gravit Space Biol Bull 14:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas LA, Browner D (1995) Effects of prolonged isolation in extreme environments on stress, coping, and depression. J Appl Soc Psychol 25:557–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas LA, Gunderson EKE, Johnson JC, Holland AW (2000) Behavior and performance on long-duration spaceflights: evidence from analogue environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 71(Suppl 1):A29–A36

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen RE (ed) (1973) Man in isolation and confinement. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritsher JB (2005) Cultural factors and the international space station. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(Suppl 6):B135–B144

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins LN, Helzer JE, Weissman MM et al (1984) Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41:949–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandal GM, Vaernes R, Ursin H (1995) Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 7:617–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Santy PA (1994) Choosing the right stuff. The psychological selection of astronauts and cosmonauts. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Santy PA (1997) Behavior and performance in the space environment. In: S Churchill (ed) Fundamentals of Space Life Sciences. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 2(14):187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Haythorn WW (1972) Effects of compatibility, crowding, group size, and leadership seniority on stress, anxiety, hostility, and annoyance in isolated groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 22:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuster JC (1996) Bold endeavors: lessons from polar and space exploration. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld P (2001) Applying positive psychology in the study of extreme environments. Hum Perf Extrem Environ 6:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld P (2005) Invulnerability, coping, salutogenesis, integration: four phases of space psychology. Aviat Space Environ Med 76:B61–B66

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DA, Wheeler L, Altman I (1968) Stress reactions in socially isolated groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 9:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakoch D (2011) Psychology of space exploration. NASA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro SJ, Gualtieri J, Minionis D (1995) Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal emergency. Mil Psychol 7:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawna Pandya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pandya, S., Kraus, L.v. (2019). Psychosocial Resilience. In: Seedhouse, E., Shayler, D. (eds) Handbook of Life Support Systems for Spacecraft and Extraterrestrial Habitats. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09575-2_212-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09575-2_212-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09575-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09575-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics