Skip to main content

Offspring Diversity Hypothesis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 546 Accesses

Synonyms

Genetic diversity hypothesis

Definition

Females mix sperm from different males in order to increase the genetic diversity of their offspring.

Introduction

If polyandry is a female strategy, it must benefit the reproductive success of females. By mating with more than one male, females may enhance their fitness through direct or material benefit, such as increased provisioning. The payoff to fitness may also be genetically based. One possible explanation for these genetic benefits is the offspring diversity hypothesis, which states that females mix sperm from different males in order to increase the genetic diversity of their offspring (Williams 1975). Sexually reproducing parents produce genetically variable offspring because recombination of male and female genes produces novel gene combinations (Willams 1975). Genetic contributions from multiple males will result in more novel gene combinations and even greater offspring genetic diversity. Such diversity can improve female...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguirre, J. D., & Marshall, D. J. (2011). Does genetic diversity reduce sibling competition? Evolution, 66, 94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Case, T. J., & Taper, M. L. (1986). On the coexistence and coevolution of asexual and sexual competitors. Evolution, 40(2), 366–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver-Apgar, C. E., Christine, E., Thornhill, R., et al. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loman, J., Madsen, T., & Hakansson, T. (1988). Increased fitness from multiple matings, and genetic heterogeneity: A model of a possible mechanism. Oikos, 52(1), 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1993). Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 142(5), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scelza, B. A. (2013). Choosy but not chaste: Multiple mating in human females. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 259–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, K. E., & Hames, R. B. (2012). A survey of non-classical polyandry. Human Nature, 23(2), 149–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J. (1991). Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour, 41, 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1975). Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasui, Y. (2001). Female multiple mating as a genetic bet-hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable. Ecological Research, 16(4), 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Starkweather .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Starkweather, K. (2016). Offspring Diversity Hypothesis. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_121-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_121-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics