Skip to main content

Grouping and Predation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Aggregation; Living in groups; Sociality

Introduction

The formation of groups is one of the most conspicuous and striking behaviors seen in animals. It is observed across a diverse range of living organisms, from colonies of multicell slime molds to human cities that rely on extensive and complex infrastructure. The reasons we may observe a set of individuals in closer proximity to one another than expected from a random distribution are varied. Animals that are usually asocial may aggregate around a food resource, such as brown bears (Ursus arctos) feeding on migrating salmon in rivers, or aggregation may emerge simply from a lack of dispersal, where offspring tend to be found in close proximity to their parents and other relatives. In many other cases, however, aggregations are a result of social attraction, where individuals actively seek out the company of others. Once such groups form, they can be very stable, with the group moving as a unit, synchronizing their activity...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, M., & Wiklund, C. G. (1978). Clumping versus spacing out: Experiments on nest predation in fieldfares (Turdus pilaris). Animal Behaviour, 26, 1207–1212. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(78)90110-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, U., Federle, W., Seidel, H., Grafe, T. U., & Ioannou, C. C. (2015). How to catch more prey with less effective traps: Explaining the evolution of temporarily inactive traps in carnivorous pitcher plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142675. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, G. (2004). Reduced flocking by birds on islands with relaxed predation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1543), 1039–1042. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, W., & Quinn, J. L. (2004). Faced with a choice, sparrowhawks more often attack the more vulnerable prey group. Oikos, 104, 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. A., & Treherne, J. E. (1981). Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature, 293(5832), 466–467. doi:10.1038/293466a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graw, B., & Manser, M. B. (2007). The function of mobbing in cooperative meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 74(3), 507–517. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1971). Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31(2), 295–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Read, J. E., Buhl, J., Hu, F., Ward, A. J. W., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2015). Initiation and spread of escape waves within animal groups. Royal Society Open Science, 2(4), 140355. doi:10.1098/rsos.140355.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. L., Burrows, M. T., & Hughes, R. N. (2003). The efficiency of adaptive search tactics for different prey distribution patterns: a simulation model based on the behaviour of juvenile plaice. Journal of Fish Biology, 63, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, D. J., Couzin, I. D., Godin, J. G. J., & Krause, J. (2004). Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour, 67(1), 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1959). Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. The Canadian Entomologist, 91(7), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, J. L., & Sherman, P. W. (1976). Advantages and disadvantages of bank swallow (Riparia riparia) coloniality. Ecological Monographs, 46(1), 33–58. doi:10.2307/1942393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, C. C. (2017). Swarm intelligence in fish? The difficulty in demonstrating distributed and self-organised collective intelligence in (some) animal groups. Behavioural Processes. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.005.

  • Ioannou, C. C., Ruxton, G. D., & Krause, J. (2008). Search rate, attack probability, and the relationship between prey density and prey encounter rate. Behavioral Ecology, 19(4), 842–846. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, C. C., Bartumeus, F., Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2011). Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2985–2990. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Landeau, L., & Terborgh, J. (1986). Oddity and the “confusion effect” in predation. Animal Behaviour, 34(5), 1372–1380. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80208-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1984). A predator’s costs of overcoming the confusion-effect of swarming prey. Animal Behaviour, 32(4), 1157–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C. (1922). The significance of the gregarious habit. Ecology, 3(2), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieucau, G., Fernö, A., Ioannou, C. C., & Handegard, N. O. (2015). Towards of a firmer explanation of large shoal formation, maintenance and collective reactions in marine fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (1996). Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Animal Behaviour, 51(5), 1077–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rode, N. O., Lievens, E. J. P., Flaven, E., Segard, A., Jabbour-Zahab, R., Sanchez, M. I., & Lenormand, T. (2013). Why join groups? Lessons from parasite-manipulated Artemia. Ecology Letters, 16(4), 493–501. doi:10.1111/ele.12074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton, G. D., Jackson, A. L., & Tosh, C. R. (2007). Confusion of predators does not rely on specialist coordinated behavior. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 590–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seghers, B. H. (1974). Schooling behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): An evolutionary response to predation. Evolution, 28(3), 486–489. doi:10.2307/2407174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, W. R., & Underhill, L. G. (1975). Flocking as an anti-predator strategy in doves. Animal Behaviour, 23, 504–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh, C. R., & Ruxton, G. D. (2010). Modelling perception with artificial neural networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. (1975). Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Animal Behaviour, 23, 779–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. F., & Pitcher, T. J. (1986). Attack abatement: A model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. American Naturalist, 128(2), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscido, S. V., & Wethey, D. S. (2002). Quantitative analysis of fiddler crab flock movement: Evidence for “selfish herd” behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 63, 735–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. J. W., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, I. D., Hart, P. J. B., & Krause, J. (2008). Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 6948–6953. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710344105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. J. W., Krause, J., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2012). Quorum decision-making in foraging fish shoals. PloS One, 7(3), e32411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Ioannou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ioannou, C. (2017). Grouping and Predation. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2699-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2699-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics