Skip to main content

Currency and Constraint

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 31 Accesses

Synonyms

Optimal foraging models; Utility

Definition

In optimality modeling of behavior, “currency” is the variable the model assumes is maximized by natural selection, while “constraints” are the hypothesized environmental, cognitive, or physiological limitations that shape the animal’s ability to maximize currency. The currency and constraints of a model are best considered hypotheses that establish model predictions to be tested with behavioral data.

Introduction

Optimality models of behavior aim to develop testable predictions about the behavioral decisions of organisms under the assumption that natural selection has favored behavior patterns that maximize Darwinian fitness. These models and their predictions arise from two sets of hypotheses that are implicitly or – more helpfully – explicitly described in the model as currencies and constraints. The currency in an optimality model is the net benefit of the behavioral decision hypothesized to be closely related to the animal’s...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belovsky, G. E. (1978). Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: The moose. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 105–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, R. (1998). Constraints on information processing and their effects on behavior. In R. Dukas (Ed.), Cognitive ecology (pp. 297–342). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau, L. A. (2008). Solitary foraging strategies. In E. Danchin, L.-A. Giraldeau, & F. Cezilly (Eds.), Behavioural ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: Tests of another hypothesis about men’s foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (2014). Foraging currencies, metabolism, and behavioural routines. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik, A. (1984). Central place foraging in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). I. Patch residence time. Journal of Animal Ecology, 53, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1984). Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, A. L., Oosterbeek, K., Ens, B. J., & Verhulst, S. (2006). Optimal foraging on perilous prey: Risk of bill damage reduces optimal prey size in oystercatchers. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg, R. C. (1998). Behavioral decisions about foraging and predator avoidance. In R. Dukas (Ed.), Cognitive ecology (pp. 297–342). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Davis, J. (2017). Currency and Constraint. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2750-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2750-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics