Skip to main content

Field of Linguistics, The

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 164 Accesses

Synonyms

None.

Definition

The scientific study of human language(s) and/or the human language faculty.

Introduction

“Asking a linguist how many languages they speak is like asking a biologist how many pets they have.” -Unknown

Comparing biologists with linguists illustrates one of the more common misunderstandings about linguistics: although language is the object of study in linguistics (like living things are the object of study in biology), the relationship between linguists and language is most often one of observation rather than ownership or fluency. Using a language and being able to describe how a language works are two very different things: for example, if you’re reading this, you are presumably fluent in English. But, unless you’ve studied linguistics before, it’s unlikely that you can say whether the ‘p’ at the end of the word stop is aspirated or not. (For interested readers, in the case of the word stop, the p is not aspirated; say pin and stopwith your hand directly in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brentari, D. (2011). In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. Yu (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 691–721). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cate, C. ten., & Okanoya, K. (2012). Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: Natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 367(1598), 1984-1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures (2). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corballis, M. C. (2014). The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuskley, C., Pugliese, M., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Loreto, V., & Tria, F. (2014). Internal and external dynamics in language: Evidence from verb regularity in a historical corpus of English. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. E. (2011). The world atlas of language structures online. Retrieved 13 May 2016, from http://wals.info

  • Everett, C. (2013). Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and domains (Vol. 25). New York: Walter de Gruter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J., & Holliman, E. (1993). Switchboard-1 release 2 ldf97s62. Philadelphia linguistic data consortium. Retrieved from https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC97S62

  • Harley, T. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Ara, N. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2-3), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, E. (2008). Nim chimpsky: The chimp who would be human. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Z. (2006). Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2004). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins, and transformations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: The database. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, T. G. B., et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, W.D., Dobrovolsky, M., & Katamba, F. (1996). Contemporary Linguistics. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1900). Tactical deception in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1990). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Cuskley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Cuskley, C. (2016). Field of Linguistics, The. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3349-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3349-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics