Synonyms
None.
Definition
The scientific study of human language(s) and/or the human language faculty.
Introduction
“Asking a linguist how many languages they speak is like asking a biologist how many pets they have.” -Unknown
Comparing biologists with linguists illustrates one of the more common misunderstandings about linguistics: although language is the object of study in linguistics (like living things are the object of study in biology), the relationship between linguists and language is most often one of observation rather than ownership or fluency. Using a language and being able to describe how a language works are two very different things: for example, if you’re reading this, you are presumably fluent in English. But, unless you’ve studied linguistics before, it’s unlikely that you can say whether the ‘p’ at the end of the word stop is aspirated or not. (For interested readers, in the case of the word stop, the p is not aspirated; say pin and stopwith your hand directly in...
References
Brentari, D. (2011). In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. Yu (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 691–721). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cate, C. ten., & Okanoya, K. (2012). Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: Natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 367(1598), 1984-1994.
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Walter de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures (2). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Corballis, M. C. (2014). The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought, and civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cuskley, C., Pugliese, M., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Loreto, V., & Tria, F. (2014). Internal and external dynamics in language: Evidence from verb regularity in a historical corpus of English. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102882.
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. E. (2011). The world atlas of language structures online. Retrieved 13 May 2016, from http://wals.info
Everett, C. (2013). Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and domains (Vol. 25). New York: Walter de Gruter.
Godfrey, J., & Holliman, E. (1993). Switchboard-1 release 2 ldf97s62. Philadelphia linguistic data consortium. Retrieved from https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC97S62
Harley, T. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Ara, N. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2-3), 61–83.
Hess, E. (2008). Nim chimpsky: The chimp who would be human. New York: Bantam.
Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89.
Jiang, Z. (2006). Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 237–257.
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Linell, P. (2004). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins, and transformations. London: Routledge.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: The database. Hove: Psychology Press.
McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, T. G. B., et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182.
O’Grady, W.D., Dobrovolsky, M., & Katamba, F. (1996). Contemporary Linguistics. Longman.
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11), 456–463.
Tomasello, M. (2009). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1900). Tactical deception in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(2), 233–244.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1990). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cuskley, C. (2016). Field of Linguistics, The. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3349-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3349-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences