Abstract
Although several qualitative analyses appeared in the domain of Learning Analytics (LA), a systematic quantitative analysis of the effects of the empirical research findings toward the development of more reliable Smart Learning Environments (SLE) is still missing. This chapter aims at preserving and enhancing the chronicles of recent LA developments as well as covering the abovementioned gap. The core question is where these two research areas intersect and how the significant LA research findings could be beneficial for guiding the construction of SLEs. This meta-analysis study synthesizes research on the effectiveness of LA and targets at determining the influence of its dimensions on learning outcomes so far. Sixty-six experimental and quasi-experimental papers published from 2009 through September 2015 in the domain of LA were coded and analyzed. Overall, the weighted random effects mean effect size (g) was 0.433 (pā=ā0.001). The collection was heterogeneous (Qt(66)ā=ā78.47). Here, the results of the statistical and classification processes applied during the meta-analysis process are presented and the most important issues raised are discussed.
References
Agudo-Peregrina, Ć. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-GonzĆ”lez, M. Ć., & HernĆ”ndez-GarcĆa, Ć. (2015). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 542ā550.
Ali, L., Asadi, M., GaÅ”eviÄ, D., JovanoviÄ, J., & Hatala, M. (2013). Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 62, 130ā148.
Ali, L., Hatala, M., GaÅ”eviÄ, D., & JovanoviÄ, J. (2012). A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Computers & Education, 58(1), 470ā489.
Aramo-Immonen, H., Jussila, J., & HuhtamƤki, J. (2015). Exploring co-learning behavior of conference participants with visual network analysis of Twitter data. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1154ā1162.
Baalsrud Hauge, J., Stanescu, I. A., Moreno-Ger, P., Arnab, S., Lim, T., Serrano-Laguna, A., ā¦ Degano, C. (2015). Learning analytics architecture to scaffold learning experience through technology-based methods. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(1), 29ā44.
Baker, R. S. J., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3ā17.
Barla, M., BielikovĆ”, M., Ezzeddinne, A. B., KramĆ”r, T., Å imko, M., & VozĆ”r, O. (2010). On the impact of adaptive test question selection for learning efficiency. Computers & Education, 55(2), 846ā857.
Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., & Berta, R. (2013). Assessment in and of serious games: An overview. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 1ā11.
Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief (pp. 1ā57). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive meta-analysis [computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat. https://www.meta-analysis.com/
Cambruzzi, W. L., Rigo, S. J., & Barbosa, J. L. V. (2015). Dropout prediction and reduction in distance education courses with the learning analytics multitrail approach. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 23ā47.
Chen, C.-M., & Chen, M.-C. (2009). Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 256ā273.
Cheung Kong, S., & Song, Y. (2015). An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD for reflective engagement in higher education. Computers & Education, 88, 227ā240.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta analysis: A step by step approach (Applied Social Research Methods Series 4th ed., Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CredĆ©, M., & Niehorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: A quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 133ā165.
DāMello, S. K. (2013). A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1082ā1099.
Dejaeger, K., Goethals, F., Giangreco, A., Mola, L., & Baesens, B. (2012). Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 548ā562.
Demmans Epp, C., Bull, S. (2015). Uncertainty representation in visualizations of learning analytics for learners: Current approaches and opportunities. TLT, 8(3), 242ā260.
Economides, A. A. (2009). Adaptive context-aware pervasive and ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 169ā192.
Feidakis, M., Daradoumis, T., Caballe, S., & Conesca, J. (2013). Measuring the impact of emotion awareness on elearning situations. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems.
Ferguson, R. (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges (Technical Report KMI-2012). Retrieved from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/techreport/kmi-12-01
Fidalgo-Blanco, Ć., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., GarcĆa-PeƱalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Ć. (2015). Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149ā156.
Fulantelli, G., Taibi, D., & Arrigo, M. (2015). A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 50ā59.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285ā292.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3ā8.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Guo, W. W. (2010). Incorporating statistical and neural network approaches for student course satisfaction analysis and prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3358ā3365.
Guruler, H., Istanbullu, A., & Karahasan, M. (2010). A new student performance analysing system using knowledge discovery in higher educational databases. Computers & Education, 55(1), 247ā254.
HernĆ”ndez-GarcĆa, A., GonzĆ”lez-GonzĆ”lez, I., JimĆ©nez-Zarco, A. I., & Chaparro-PelĆ”ez, J. (2015). Applying social learning analytics to message boards in online distance learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 68ā80.
Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments ā a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments Open Journal, 1(4), 1ā14.
Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 1ā10.
JoksimoviÄ, S., GaÅ”eviÄ, D., Loughin, T. M., KovanoviÄ, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204ā217.
Kim, S., Song, S.-M., & Yoon, Y.-I. (2011). Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors, 11(8), 7835ā7850.
Koper, R. (2014). Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments Open Journal, 1(5), 1ā17.
KovanoviÄ, V., GaÅ”eviÄ, D., JoksimoviÄ, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74ā89.
Lee, J., Zo, H., & Lee, H. (2014). Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1082ā1096.
Leong, C.-K., Lee, Y.-H., & Mak, W.-K. (2012). Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2584ā2589.
Lin, C.-F., Yeh, Y., Hung, Y. H., & Chang, R. (2013). Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees. Computers & Education, 68, 199ā210.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review Online, 46(5), 31ā40.
Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53(3), 950ā965.
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an āearly warning systemā for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588ā599.
MinoviÄ, M., MilovanoviÄ, M., Å oÅ”eviÄ, U., & Conde GonzĆ”lez, M. Ć. (2015). Visualisation of student learning model in serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 98ā107.
Moissa, B., Gasparini, I., & Kemczinski, A. (2015). A systematic mapping on the learning analytics field and its analysis in the massive open online courses context. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(3), 1ā24.
Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2009). Prediction of studentās mood during an online test using formula-based and neural network-based method. Computers & Education, 53(3), 644ā652.
Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). Affective learning: Empathetic agents with emotional facial and tone of voice expressions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3, 260ā272.
MuƱoz-Merino, P. J., RuipĆ©rez-Valiente, J. A., Alario-Hoyos, C., PĆ©rez-SanagustĆn, M., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108ā118.
Noh, K. S., Ju, S. H., & Jung, J. T. (2011). An exploratory study on concept and realization conditions of smart learning. Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 9(2), 79ā88.
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49ā64.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2012). The attainment of White and ethnic minority students in distance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 393ā408.
Rienties, B. & Rivers, B.A. (2014). Measuring and understanding learner emotions: Evidence and prospects. Learning Analytics Review, 1, 1ā30, ISSN: 2057ā7494.
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135ā146.
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12ā27.
Romero-Zaldivar, V.-A., Pardo, A., Burgos, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Monitoring student progress using virtual appliances: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1058ā1067.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Scott, K., & Benlamri, R. (2010). Context-aware services for smart learning spaces. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 214ā227.
Serrano-Laguna, A., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & FernĆ”ndez-ManjĆ³n, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: Application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203ā209.
Shute, V. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In Computer games and instruction (pp. 503ā523), Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1ā10.
Suthers, D. D., & Verbert, K. (2013). Learning analytics as a āmiddle space.ā In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 1ā4). New York, NY: ACM.
Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 89, 53ā74.
Tanes, Z., Arnold, K. E., King, A. S., & Remnet, M. A. (2011). Using signals for appropriate feedback: Perceptions and practices. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2414ā2422.
Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Handhelds go to school: Lessons learned. IEEE Computer, 36(9), 30ā37.
Tempelaar, D. T., Niculescu, A., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012). How achievement emotions impact studentsā decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 161ā169.
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2014). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157ā167.
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157ā167.
Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 59, 710ā721.
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ ā¦ The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1ā12.
van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28ā39.
van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers & Education, 90, 80ā94.
Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging Deeper into Learnersā Experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, Notetaking, and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570ā587.
Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133ā148.
Westera, W., Nadolski, R., Hummel, H., & Wopereis, I. (2008). Serious games for higher education: A framework for reducing design complexity. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 24(5), 420ā432.
Westera, W., Nadolski, R., & Hummel, H. (2014). Serious gaming analytics: What studentsā log files tell us about gaming and learning. International Journal of Serious Games (to appear). http://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/
Xing, W., Wadholm, R., Petakovic, E., & Goggins, S. (2015). Group learning assessment: Developing a theory-informed analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 110ā128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Papamitsiou, Z., Economides, A. (2016). Learning Analytics for Smart Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Research Results from 2009 to 2015. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_15-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_15-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education