Skip to main content

Learning Analytics for Smart Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Research Results from 2009 to 2015

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Learning, Design, and Technology

Abstract

Although several qualitative analyses appeared in the domain of Learning Analytics (LA), a systematic quantitative analysis of the effects of the empirical research findings toward the development of more reliable Smart Learning Environments (SLE) is still missing. This chapter aims at preserving and enhancing the chronicles of recent LA developments as well as covering the abovementioned gap. The core question is where these two research areas intersect and how the significant LA research findings could be beneficial for guiding the construction of SLEs. This meta-analysis study synthesizes research on the effectiveness of LA and targets at determining the influence of its dimensions on learning outcomes so far. Sixty-six experimental and quasi-experimental papers published from 2009 through September 2015 in the domain of LA were coded and analyzed. Overall, the weighted random effects mean effect size (g) was 0.433 (pā€‰=ā€‰0.001). The collection was heterogeneous (Qt(66)ā€‰=ā€‰78.47). Here, the results of the statistical and classification processes applied during the meta-analysis process are presented and the most important issues raised are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agudo-Peregrina, Ɓ. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-GonzĆ”lez, M. Ɓ., & HernĆ”ndez-GarcĆ­a, Ɓ. (2015). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relation with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 542ā€“550.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ali, L., Asadi, M., GaÅ”ević, D., Jovanović, J., & Hatala, M. (2013). Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 62, 130ā€“148.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ali, L., Hatala, M., GaÅ”ević, D., & Jovanović, J. (2012). A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Computers & Education, 58(1), 470ā€“489.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Aramo-Immonen, H., Jussila, J., & HuhtamƤki, J. (2015). Exploring co-learning behavior of conference participants with visual network analysis of Twitter data. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1154ā€“1162.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baalsrud Hauge, J., Stanescu, I. A., Moreno-Ger, P., Arnab, S., Lim, T., Serrano-Laguna, A., ā€¦ Degano, C. (2015). Learning analytics architecture to scaffold learning experience through technology-based methods. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(1), 29ā€“44.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baker, R. S. J., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3ā€“17.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barla, M., BielikovĆ”, M., Ezzeddinne, A. B., KramĆ”r, T., Å imko, M., & VozĆ”r, O. (2010). On the impact of adaptive test question selection for learning efficiency. Computers & Education, 55(2), 846ā€“857.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., & Berta, R. (2013). Assessment in and of serious games: An overview. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 1ā€“11.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief (pp. 1ā€“57). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). Comprehensive meta-analysis [computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat. https://www.meta-analysis.com/

  • Cambruzzi, W. L., Rigo, S. J., & Barbosa, J. L. V. (2015). Dropout prediction and reduction in distance education courses with the learning analytics multitrail approach. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 23ā€“47.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chen, C.-M., & Chen, M.-C. (2009). Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 256ā€“273.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cheung Kong, S., & Song, Y. (2015). An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD for reflective engagement in higher education. Computers & Education, 88, 227ā€“240.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta analysis: A step by step approach (Applied Social Research Methods Series 4th ed., Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CredĆ©, M., & Niehorster, S. (2012). Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: A quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 133ā€“165.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dā€™Mello, S. K. (2013). A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1082ā€“1099.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dejaeger, K., Goethals, F., Giangreco, A., Mola, L., & Baesens, B. (2012). Gaining insight into student satisfaction using comprehensible data mining techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 548ā€“562.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Demmans Epp, C., Bull, S. (2015). Uncertainty representation in visualizations of learning analytics for learners: Current approaches and opportunities. TLT, 8(3), 242ā€“260.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Economides, A. A. (2009). Adaptive context-aware pervasive and ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 169ā€“192.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Feidakis, M., Daradoumis, T., Caballe, S., & Conesca, J. (2013). Measuring the impact of emotion awareness on elearning situations. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ferguson, R. (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges (Technical Report KMI-2012). Retrieved from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/techreport/kmi-12-01

  • Fidalgo-Blanco, Ɓ., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., GarcĆ­a-PeƱalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Ɓ. (2015). Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 149ā€“156.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Fulantelli, G., Taibi, D., & Arrigo, M. (2015). A framework to support educational decision making in mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 50ā€“59.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285ā€“292.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Guo, W. W. (2010). Incorporating statistical and neural network approaches for student course satisfaction analysis and prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3358ā€“3365.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Guruler, H., Istanbullu, A., & Karahasan, M. (2010). A new student performance analysing system using knowledge discovery in higher educational databases. Computers & Education, 55(1), 247ā€“254.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • HernĆ”ndez-GarcĆ­a, A., GonzĆ”lez-GonzĆ”lez, I., JimĆ©nez-Zarco, A. I., & Chaparro-PelĆ”ez, J. (2015). Applying social learning analytics to message boards in online distance learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 68ā€“80.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments ā€“ a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments Open Journal, 1(4), 1ā€“14.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 1ā€“10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Joksimović, S., GaÅ”ević, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanović, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204ā€“217.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, S., Song, S.-M., & Yoon, Y.-I. (2011). Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors, 11(8), 7835ā€“7850.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Koper, R. (2014). Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments Open Journal, 1(5), 1ā€“17.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kovanović, V., GaÅ”ević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74ā€“89.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lee, J., Zo, H., & Lee, H. (2014). Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1082ā€“1096.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Leong, C.-K., Lee, Y.-H., & Mak, W.-K. (2012). Mining sentiments in SMS texts for teaching evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2584ā€“2589.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lin, C.-F., Yeh, Y., Hung, Y. H., & Chang, R. (2013). Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees. Computers & Education, 68, 199ā€“210.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review Online, 46(5), 31ā€“40.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lykourentzou, I., Giannoukos, I., Nikolopoulos, V., Mpardis, G., & Loumos, V. (2009). Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Computers & Education, 53(3), 950ā€“965.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an ā€œearly warning systemā€ for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588ā€“599.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Minović, M., Milovanović, M., Å oÅ”ević, U., & Conde GonzĆ”lez, M. Ɓ. (2015). Visualisation of student learning model in serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 98ā€“107.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Moissa, B., Gasparini, I., & Kemczinski, A. (2015). A systematic mapping on the learning analytics field and its analysis in the massive open online courses context. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(3), 1ā€“24.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2009). Prediction of studentā€™s mood during an online test using formula-based and neural network-based method. Computers & Education, 53(3), 644ā€“652.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). Affective learning: Empathetic agents with emotional facial and tone of voice expressions. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3, 260ā€“272.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • MuƱoz-Merino, P. J., RuipĆ©rez-Valiente, J. A., Alario-Hoyos, C., PĆ©rez-SanagustĆ­n, M., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108ā€“118.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Noh, K. S., Ju, S. H., & Jung, J. T. (2011). An exploratory study on concept and realization conditions of smart learning. Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 9(2), 79ā€“88.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49ā€“64.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2012). The attainment of White and ethnic minority students in distance education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 393ā€“408.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rienties, B. & Rivers, B.A. (2014). Measuring and understanding learner emotions: Evidence and prospects. Learning Analytics Review, 1, 1ā€“30, ISSN: 2057ā€“7494.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135ā€“146.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12ā€“27.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Romero-Zaldivar, V.-A., Pardo, A., Burgos, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Monitoring student progress using virtual appliances: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1058ā€“1067.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Scott, K., & Benlamri, R. (2010). Context-aware services for smart learning spaces. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 214ā€“227.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Serrano-Laguna, A., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & FernĆ”ndez-ManjĆ³n, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: Application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203ā€“209.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shute, V. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In Computer games and instruction (pp. 503ā€“523), Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1ā€“10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Suthers, D. D., & Verbert, K. (2013). Learning analytics as a ā€œmiddle space.ā€ In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 1ā€“4). New York, NY: ACM.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 89, 53ā€“74.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tanes, Z., Arnold, K. E., King, A. S., & Remnet, M. A. (2011). Using signals for appropriate feedback: Perceptions and practices. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2414ā€“2422.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Handhelds go to school: Lessons learned. IEEE Computer, 36(9), 30ā€“37.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Niculescu, A., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2012). How achievement emotions impact studentsā€™ decisions for online learning, and what precedes those emotions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 161ā€“169.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2014). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157ā€“167.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157ā€“167.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 59, 710ā€“721.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ ā€¦ The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1ā€“12.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28ā€“39.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers & Education, 90, 80ā€“94.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging Deeper into Learnersā€™ Experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, Notetaking, and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570ā€“587.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133ā€“148.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Westera, W., Nadolski, R., Hummel, H., & Wopereis, I. (2008). Serious games for higher education: A framework for reducing design complexity. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 24(5), 420ā€“432.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Westera, W., Nadolski, R., & Hummel, H. (2014). Serious gaming analytics: What studentsā€™ log files tell us about gaming and learning. International Journal of Serious Games (to appear). http://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/

  • Xing, W., Wadholm, R., Petakovic, E., & Goggins, S. (2015). Group learning assessment: Developing a theory-informed analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 110ā€“128.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zacharoula Papamitsiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Papamitsiou, Z., Economides, A. (2016). Learning Analytics for Smart Learning Environments: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Research Results from 2009 to 2015. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_15-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_15-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics