Skip to main content

Liberty, Women on

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences
  • 49 Accesses

Synonyms

Free will; Freedom; Freedom of choice

Introduction

In the seventeenth century and early 1700s, several women thinkers discuss the concept of liberty in its various metaphysical, moral, and political guises. Among these women are Elisabeth of Bohemia, Margaret Cavendish, Anne Conway, Mary Astell, Gabrielle Suchon, Damaris Cudworth Masham, Sarah Chapone, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and Emilie Du Châtelet. Some of these writers touch on issues to do with freedom and determinism, such as the problem of reconciling the existence of human free will with a purely materialist theory of causation. Some raise problems for free will based on the fact that the mind is frequently incapable of overcoming the influence of the passions and other antecedent causes. Others extend their views about human agency to moral and political issues concerning liberty, with a specific focus on the freedom of women as a socio-political group (for overviews, see Broad and Detlefsen 2017; Broad 2014a).

This...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Astell M (1996) Reflections upon marriage. In: Springborg P (ed) Political writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Astell M (2002) A serious proposal to the ladies, parts I and II (ed: Springborg P). Broadview Press, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Astell M (2013) The Christian religion, as professed by a daughter of the Church of England (ed: J Broad). Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies and Iter Publishing, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle D (2013) Margaret Cavendish on gender, nature, and freedom. Hypatia 28(3):516–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle D (2017) Freedom and necessity in the work of Margaret Cavendish. In: Broad J, Detlefsen K (eds) Women and liberty, 1600–1800: philosophical essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 141–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle D (2018) The well-ordered universe: the philosophy of Margaret Cavendish. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad J (2012) Impressions in the brain: Malebranche on women, women on Malebranche. Intellectual History Review 22(3):373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad J (2014a) Women on liberty in early modern England. Philos Compass 9(2):112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad J (2014b) Mary Astell on marriage and Lockean slavery. Hist Polit Thought 35(4):717–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad J (2015a) ‘A great championess for her sex’: Sarah Chapone on liberty as nondomination and self-mastery. Monist 98(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad J (2015b) The philosophy of Mary Astell: an early modern theory of virtue. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broad J, Detlefsen K (eds) (2017) Women and liberty, 1600–1800: philosophical essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish M (1655) The preface to the reader. In: The worlds olio. Written by the Right Honorable, the Lady Margaret Newcastle. Martin J and Allestrye J, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish M (2003) Orations of divers sorts, accommodated to divers places (1662). In: James S (ed) Political writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish M (2004) Sociable letters (ed: Fitzmaurice J). Broadview Press, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapone S (2018) The hardships of the English Laws in relation to wives by Sarah Chapone (ed: Glover SP). Routledge, Abingdon/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunning D (2016) Cavendish. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen K (2007) Reason and freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the order and disorder of nature. Arch Gesch Philos 89:157–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen K (2016) Custom, freedom and equality: Mary Astell on marriage and women’s education. In: Sowaal A, Weiss P (eds) Feminist interpretations of Mary Astell. Penn State University Press, University Park, pp 74–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1996) Leviathan (ed: Tuck R). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister A (2004) Marriage and misogyny: the place of Mary Astell in the history of political thought. Hist Polit Thought 25(1):44–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HL (1997) ‘A general war amongst the men … but none amongst the women’: political differences between Margaret and William Cavendish. In: Nenner H (ed) Politics and the political imagination in later Stuart Britain: essays presented to Lois Green Schwoerer. University of Rochester Press, New York, pp 143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Springborg P (2005) Mary Astell: theorist of freedom from domination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Staves S (1990) Married women’s separate property in England, 1660–1833. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Broad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Broad, J. (2020). Liberty, Women on. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_424-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_424-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics