Skip to main content

Practice Effects

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

Definition

Improvements in test performance resulting from repeated exposure to testing content, paradigms, or settings.

Current Knowledge

Sources of Practice Effects

Sources of practice effects include deliberate practice/rehearsal, incidental learning, procedural learning, changes in an examinee’s conceptualization of a task, shift in strategy, or increased familiarity with the test-taking environment and/or paradigm.

Practice Effects and Time

Shorter test-retest intervals are typically associated with larger magnitude practice effects. Distributed practice (i.e., multiple practice sessions over an extended period) may be more effective than massed practice (i.e., concentrated into a short span of time) in facilitating long-term learning. When follow-up testing occurs over an extended period of time, practice effects may be obscured by cognitive decline (e.g., resulting from normal aging or disease). Practice effects are generally largest from the first to second administration.

Task...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, R. J., Duff, K., & Westervelt, H. J. (Eds.). (2000). Practitioner’s guide to evaluating change with neuropsychological assessment instruments. In A. E. Puente & C. R. Reynolds (Series Eds.), Critical issues in neuropsychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. G., & Wenger, M. J. (1996). Practice effects in memory: Data, theory, and unanswered questions. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications (Vol. 2). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. McCabe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McCabe, D.L., Langer, K.G., Cornwell, M.A., Borod, J.C., Bender, H.A. (2018). Practice Effects. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1139

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics