Skip to main content

Legal Competency

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 6 Accesses

Synonyms

Competency to proceed

Definition

Otherwise referred to as “competency to proceed,” this term refers to a criminal defendant’s capacity to participate effectively and make decisions on his or her own legal behalf while being prosecuted. It is to be distinguished from legal sanity because it has a very different legal standard. Furthermore, competency most commonly deals with current mental states (at the time of the proceedings), whereas insanity deals with the mental state (mens rea) at the time the offense(s) were committed. Competency to proceed is relevant to any portion of the process, from talking to police (i.e., Miranda rights to remain silent) to plead guilty, receive a sentence, waive one’s right to counsel, and even being executed.

The rationale for questioning/examining a defendant’s competency can be traced back to English common law and the seventeenth century. In Dusky v United States (1960), the US Supreme Court upheld the right of a criminal defendant to be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Dusky v. U.S. (1960). 362 US 402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcopulos, B. A., Morgan, J. E., & Denney, R. L. (2008). Neuropsychological evaluation of competency to proceed. In R. Denney & J. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R., Otto, R. K., et al. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCat-CA). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Evaluation of competence to stand trial. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Heilbronner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heilbronner, R.L. (2018). Legal Competency. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1429

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics