Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public Sector Innovation, Social Entrepreneurship, and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

  • 191 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter discusses legitimacy in relation to public sector innovation, social entrepreneurship, and CSR. All three terms refer to organizing principles and managerial trends that, implicitly or explicitly, have implications not only for our understanding of organizations but also of the role and division between the three sectors of society. The chapter aims to understand legitimacy as a critical concept in relation to these three phenomena and analyzes and discusses ways to study legitimacy in relation to them. It draws on legitimacy studies in institutional theory with its sociological and empirically oriented approach and political philosophy with a normative understanding of legitimacy, and the potentials and challenges of these two approaches to legitimacy are discussed. Legitimacy in relation to public sector innovation, in a normative sense, always follows the idea about what the public sector is and should be. The study of social entrepreneurship deploys an institutional theory conception of legitimacy to challenge economic and rationalist explanations for the emergence of social enterprise, thereby displaying its ideological and political underpinnings. The study of CSR critically discusses an example of deliberative legitimacy, which represents direct transfer of a normative political concept of legitimacy to corporate legitimacy studies. The discussion shows that the premises of such a transfer need to be further developed in order to be empirically and normatively convincing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albury D (2005) Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money Manag 25(1):51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann P, Ingenhoff D (2016) Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relat Rev 42:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly D (2013) Managing corporate legitimacy: a toolkit. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine M, Lewis J (2007) Innovation and innovators inside government: from institutions to networks. Governance 20(4):581–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cradden C (2005) Repoliticizing management: a theory of corporate legitimacy. Ashgate Publishing, Hants/Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F, Schneider M (2008) Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. J Public Adm Res Theory 19(3):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart R (2004) The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 14(4):411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 49–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dees JG, Haas M, Centennial PH (1998) The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kaufmann Center for Social Entrepreneurship. https://csistg.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/csi.gsb.stanford.edu/files/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf

  • Dey P, Steyaert C (2012) Social entrepreneurship: critique and the radical enactment of the social. Soc Entrep J 8(2):90–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey P, Teasdale S (2013) Social enterprise and dis/identification – the politics of identity work in the English third sector. Adm Theory Praxis 35(2):248–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diochon M, Anderson AR (2011) Ambivalence and ambiguity in social enterprise; narratives about values in reconciling purpose and practices. Int Entrep Manag J 7:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay P (2004) Against ‘Enterprise’ (but not against ‘enterprise’, for that would make no sense). Organization 11(1):37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry AM (2009) Refusing the market: a democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 38(4):582–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen EO (1999) Kommunikativ Ledelse – om styring av offentlige organisasjoner, fagbokforlaget. Vigmostad & Bjørke AS, Bergen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2008) Scales of justice: reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK/Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (2008) A Friedman Doctrine – the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In: Crane A, Matten D, Spence L (eds) Corporate social responsibility – readings and cases in a global context. Routledge, London/New York, pp 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Froggett L, Chamberlaine P (2004) Narratives of social enterprise: from biography to practice and policy critique. Qual Soc Work 3(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawell M (2013) Social entrepreneurship: action grounded in needs, opportunities and/or perceived necessities? Volunt Int J Volunt Nonprofit Org 24(4):1071–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley B (2006) The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries. Eur J Polit Res 45:499–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms – contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1998) Remarks on legitimation through human rights. Philos Soc Crit 24(2/3):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2005) Efterord til Fakticitet og Gyldighed. In Habermas, J. Demokrati og Retsstat. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, pp 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley J (2005) Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money Manag 25(1):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervieux C, Gedajlovic E, Turcotte M-FB (2010) The legitimization of social entrepreneurship. J Enterp Communities 4(1):37–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HulgÃ¥rd L, Andersen LL (2012) Socialt Entreprenørskab: velfærdsafvikling eller arenaer for solidaritet? Dansk Sociologi 4(23):11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybrects B, Mertens S, Rijpens J (2014) Explaining stakeholder involvement in social enterprise governance through resources and legitimacy. In: Defourny J, HulgÃ¥rd L, Pestoff V (eds) Social enterprise and the third sector – changing european landscapes in a comparative perspective. Routledge, London/New York, pp 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • King CS, Martinelly AS (2005) Introduction – innovations in citizen engagement and empowerment: beyond boundaries. Innov J 10(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Labowitz S, Baumann-Pauly D (2014) Business as usual is not an option – supply chains and sourcing after Rana Plaza. NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergaard LL (2011) Innovating the publicness of the public sector? A critical, political philosophical discussion of public sector innovation. Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Roskilde

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason C (2012) Up for Graps: a critical discourse analysis of social entrepreneurship discourse in the United Kingdom. Soc Enterp J 8(2):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(4):340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MH (2005) Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money Manage 25:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan G, Albury D (2003) Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman J, John C (2009) Public, Politics and Power – Remaking the Public in Public Services. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JP (2005) Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy? Working Paper, No. 10, March 2005. Center for European Studies, University of Oslo, Arena, pp 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government – how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo G, Scherer A (2006) Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker S, Parker S (2007) Unlocking innovation – why citizens hold the key to public service reform. Demos, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2009) Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Robé J-P (2012) Being done with Milton Friedman. Account Econ Law 2(2):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef M, Scott RW (1998) A Multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Adm Sci Q 43:877–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Seidl D (2013) Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: sustainable development in a globalized world. J Manag Stud 50(2):259–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigalla JR, Carney S (2012) Poverty reduction through entrepreneurship: microcredit, learning and ambivalence amongst women in urban Tanzania. Int J Educ Dev 32:546–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman M (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad Manag Rev 36(4):686–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2004) Responsibility and Global Labor Justice. J Polit Philos 12(4):365–388

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Luise Li Langergaard

Authors
  1. Luise Li Langergaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luise Li Langergaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University , Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Langergaard, L.L. (2019). Public Sector Innovation, Social Entrepreneurship, and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation